Assessment of free energies from electrostatic embedding density functional tight binding-based/molecular mechanics in periodic boundary conditions

Simone Bonfrate,Woojin Park,Dulce Trejo-Zamora,Nicolas Ferré,Cheol Ho Choi,Miquel Huix-Rotllant
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26434/chemrxiv-2024-rkbds
2024-10-07
Abstract:Electrostatic embedding Quantum mechanics / molecular mechanics (QM/MM) methods in periodic boundary conditions can successfully describe the condensed phase reactivity of a fragment treated at the QM level with an atomistic description of an electrostatic environment treated at the MM level. The computational cost of ab initio QM methods limits the phase space sampling, affecting thus statistical quantities like free energies. Here, we explore the accuracy of the semi-empirical density-functional based tight-binding (DFTB) method by comparing the free energy profiles from several methods and parameters in the DFTB/MM to ab initio QM/MM free energy simulations. We show that DFTB2 correctly describes the free energy barrier of cis/trans isomerization of proline in water, the intramolecular proton transfer in pterin, and the nucleophilic fluoride substitution of chloromethane, showing a qualitatively good agreement with respect to experimental or ab initio simulations. DFTB3 describes well the free energy barriers but tends to favor weak endothermic reactions. None of the tested DFTB methods is able to predict a simultaneous water-assisted proton transfer for pterin, predicting rather a sequential proton transfer involving ionic water intermediates
Chemistry
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
### Problems the Paper Attempts to Solve This paper aims to evaluate the accuracy of free energy calculations using the Density Functional Tight Binding (DFTB) method with molecular mechanics (MM) under periodic boundary conditions. Specifically, the paper compares the free energy curves obtained from different DFTB/MM parameters and methods with ab initio quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics (QM/MM) free energy simulation results to explore the performance of the DFTB method in describing the free energy barriers of specific reaction mechanisms in aqueous solutions. ### Main Research Content 1. **Method Introduction**: - **DFTB/MM Method**: The paper proposes a new electrostatic embedding model based on DFTB, combined with a fixed charge MM environment, for calculations under periodic boundary conditions. - **Computational Efficiency**: The linear scaling electrostatic embedding QM/MM formula of the DFTB method allows for efficient model equilibration and phase space sampling, making it particularly suitable for studying the reactivity of enzymes and other biological macromolecules. 2. **Application Cases**: - **Proline Cis-Trans Isomerization**: The study investigates the cis-trans isomerization process of proline in water, evaluating the DFTB method's ability to describe the free energy barrier. - **Proton Transfer in Pterin**: The paper explores the proton transfer process in pterin in water, focusing on water-assisted proton transfer and intramolecular proton transfer. - **Nucleophilic Substitution of Chloromethane**: The analysis of the S_N2 reaction between sodium fluoride and chloromethane assesses the accuracy of the DFTB method in predicting free energy barriers. ### Key Findings 1. **Proline Cis-Trans Isomerization**: - The DFTB2 method can correctly describe the free energy barrier of proline cis-trans isomerization but underestimates the barrier height. - The DFTB3 method also describes the free energy barrier but tends to overestimate the barrier height and incorrectly predicts the stability of the cis conformation. 2. **Proton Transfer in Pterin**: - The DFTB3 method performs well in describing intramolecular proton transfer but underestimates the stability of the keto form. - For water-assisted proton transfer, all tested DFTB methods fail to predict simultaneous proton transfer, instead favoring sequential proton transfer involving ionic water intermediates. 3. **Nucleophilic Substitution of Chloromethane**: - Both DFTB2 and DFTB3 methods show some accuracy in describing the free energy barrier of the S_N2 reaction, but the DFTB3 method tends to overestimate the barrier height. ### Conclusion The paper demonstrates the potential of the DFTB method in describing the free energy barriers of specific reaction mechanisms in aqueous solutions, particularly highlighting its significant advantages in computational efficiency. However, the DFTB method still has certain limitations in some cases, such as inaccurate predictions of certain reaction pathways. These findings provide important references for further optimization of the DFTB method.