Driving Forces of Changes in Air Quality during the COVID-19 Lockdown Period in the Yangtze River Delta Region, China
Ting Liu,Xueying Wang,Jianlin Hu,Qian Wang,Jingyu An,Kangjia Gong,Jinjin Sun,Lin Li,Momei Qin,Jingyi Li,Junjie Tian,Yiwei Huang,Hong Liao,Min Zhou,Qingyao Hu,Rusha Yan,Hongli Wang,Cheng Huang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.0c00511
2020-09-14
Abstract:During the COVID-19 lockdown period (from January 23 to February 29, 2020), ambient PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations in the Yangtze River Delta (YRD) region were observed to be much lower, while the maximum daily 8 h average (MDA8) O<sub>3</sub> concentrations became much higher compared to those before the lockdown (from January 1 to 22, 2020). Here, we show that emission reduction is the major driving force for the PM<sub>2.5</sub> change, contributing to a PM<sub>2.5</sub> decrease by 37% to 55% in the four YRD major cities (i.e., Shanghai, Hangzhou, Nanjing, and Hefei), but the MDA8 O<sub>3</sub> increase is driven by both emission reduction (29%–52%) and variation in meteorological conditions (17%– 49%). Among all pollutants, reduction in emissions mainly of primary PM contributes to a PM<sub>2.5</sub> decrease by 28% to 46%, and NOx emission reduction contributes 7% to 10%. Although NOx emission reduction dominates the MDA8 O<sub>3</sub> increase (38%–59%), volatile organic compounds (VOCs) emission reduction lead to a 5% to 9% MDA8 O<sub>3</sub> decrease. Increased O<sub>3</sub> promotes secondary aerosol formation and partially offsets the decrease of PM<sub>2.5</sub> caused by the primary PM emission reductions. The results demonstrate that more coordinated air pollution control strategies are needed in YRD.The Supporting Information is available free of charge at <a class="ext-link" href="/doi/10.1021/acs.estlett.0c00511?goto=supporting-info">https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.estlett.0c00511</a>.Table S1: Model performance of PM<sub>2.5</sub> and MDA8 O<sub>3</sub> in S0 and S1. Figure S1: Comparison of observed and predicted total VOCs concentrations and observed and predicted relative changes in different VOC species due to the COVID-19 lockdown in Shanghai. Figure S2: Spatial distributions of predicted PM<sub>2.5</sub> and MDA8 O<sub>3</sub> and changes between S0 and S1 during the lockdown period. Figure S3: Comparison of key meteorological parameters (temperature, RH, PBLH, and wind) before and after the lockdown in Shanghai. Figure S4: Responses of MDA8 O<sub>3</sub> in Shanghai to NOx and VOC reductions during the study period. Figure S5: Average concentration of PM<sub>2.5</sub> composition on polluted days and clean days before and after the lockdown. Figure S6: Spatial distributions of predicted PM<sub>2.5</sub> and MDA8 O<sub>3</sub> and changes between S0 and S5 during the lockdown period. Figure S7: Predicted PM2.5 and MDA8 O3 in S5 and S6 with 2019 meteorological conditions. (<a class="ext-link" href="/doi/suppl/10.1021/acs.estlett.0c00511/suppl_file/ez0c00511_si_001.pdf">PDF</a>)This article has not yet been cited by other publications.
environmental sciences,engineering, environmental