Technoeconomic Insights into Metal Hydrides for Stationary Hydrogen Storage

Hanna Breunig,Xinyi Wang,Peng Peng,Matthew Witman,Vitalie Stavila,Mark Allendorf

DOI: https://doi.org/10.26434/chemrxiv-2024-gwrzq

2024-10-03

Abstract:Metal hydrides (MHs) are promising candidates for hydrogen storage due to their high volumetric energy densities and safety features. Recent developments suggest hydride systems can cycle and operate at pressures and temperatures favorable coupling with fuel cells for stationary long-duration energy storage applications. In this study, we present a conceptual design of a metal hydride-based storage system for backup power (0 to 20 MW supplied over 0 to 100 hours), and benchmark system cost and performance. Leveraging experimental hydrogen absorption and desorption data, we determine the uptake/release of hydrogen across likely pressure and temperature conditions, and estimate the equipment power, upfront capital cost, levelized cost of storage, land footprint, and energy density for a select number of metal hydrides and hypothetical operation scenarios. Our findings indicate that hydride-based storage systems hold significant size advantage in physical footprint, requiring up to 65% less land than the 170-bar compressed gas storage options. Metal hydride systems can be cost competitive with 350-bar compressed gas systems, with TiFe0.85Mn0.05 achieving $0.453/kWh and complex MH 2Mg(NH2)2-2.1LiH-0.1KH achieving $0.383/kWh, compared to $0.397/kWh for 350 bar compressed gas in the base case scenario. However, these advantages are sensitive to charging and discharging rate requirements, operational cycles and material manufacturing prices. Extending charging times and increasing operating cycles significantly reduce LCOS, especially for complex MHs, making them more competitive for applications with slow charging and long duration energy storage needs. Key strategies to further enhance the competitiveness of MHs include leveraging waste heat from fuel cells, increasing hydrogen uptake, and achieving metal hydride production costs of US$10/kg.

Chemistry

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is: how to achieve efficient stationary hydrogen storage by using metal hydrides (MHs) to meet the demand for long - term backup power. Specifically, the paper focuses on the following aspects:

1. **Improving the safety and efficiency of hydrogen storage**:
- Traditional high - pressure compressed gas storage methods have leakage and safety risks, while metal hydrides can store hydrogen at lower pressures, providing a safer and more compact storage solution.

2. **Optimizing system cost and performance**:
- Through techno - economic analysis (TEA) of different metal hydride materials, evaluate their cost - effectiveness in backup power applications.
- Compare the cost and performance of metal hydrides and high - pressure compressed gas storage systems, and explore whether metal hydrides can be cost - competitive under specific conditions.

3. **Exploring application scenarios suitable for large - scale long - term energy storage**:
- Design and evaluate the feasibility of metal hydride storage systems for the backup power requirements of key infrastructures such as hospitals and data centers.
- Study the effects of different operating conditions (such as charge - discharge rates, cycle times) on system performance and cost, and provide guidance for practical applications.

4. **Proposing improvement strategies**:
- Explore how to further enhance the competitiveness of metal hydride storage systems by means of utilizing fuel cell waste heat, increasing hydrogen absorption, and reducing the production cost of metal hydrides.

In summary, this paper aims to evaluate the potential of metal hydrides in stationary hydrogen storage through detailed techno - economic analysis, and provide scientific basis and improvement suggestions for their application in the backup power field.