Abstract:Detecting out-of-distribution (OOD) samples poses a significant safety challenge when deploying models in open-world scenarios. Advanced works assume that OOD and in-distributional (ID) samples exhibit a distribution discrepancy, showing an encouraging direction in estimating the uncertainty with embedding features or predicting outputs. Besides incorporating auxiliary outlier as decision boundary, quantifying a “meaningful distance” in embedding space as uncertainty measurement is a promising strategy. However, these distances-based approaches overlook the data structure and heavily rely on the high-dimension features learned by deep neural networks, causing unreliable distances due to the “curse of dimensionality”. In this work, we propose a data structure-aware approach to mitigate the sensitivity of distances to the “curse of dimensionality”, where high-dimensional features are mapped to the manifold of ID samples, leveraging the well-known manifold assumption. Specifically, we present a novel distance termed as tangent distance, which tackles the issue of generalizing the meaningfulness of distances on testing samples to detect OOD inputs. Inspired by manifold learning for adversarial examples, where adversarial region probability density is close to the orthogonal direction of the manifold, and both OOD and adversarial samples have common characteristic−imperceptible perturbations with shift distribution, we propose that OOD samples are relatively far away from the ID manifold, where tangent distance directly computes the Euclidean distance between samples and the nearest submanifold space−instantiated as the linear approximation of local region on the manifold. We provide empirical and theoretical insights to demonstrate the effectiveness of OOD uncertainty measurements on the low-dimensional subspace. Extensive experiments show that the tangent distance performs competitively with other post hoc OOD detection baselines on common and large-scale benchmarks, and the theoretical analysis supports our claim that ID samples are likely to reside in high-density regions, explaining the effectiveness of internal connections among ID data

Out-of-Distribution Detection by Principal Component Correspondence

Revisit PCA-based Technique for Out-of-Distribution Detection.

Kernel PCA for Out-of-Distribution Detection

Unsupervised Out-of-Distribution Object Detection via PCA-Driven Dynamic Prototype Enhancement

Out-of-Distribution Detection via Conditional Kernel Independence Model

Detecting Out-of-Distribution Examples Via Class-Conditional Impressions Reappearing

Out-of-Distribution Detection with Overlap Index

The Best of Both Worlds: On the Dilemma of Out-of-distribution Detection

Towards In-Distribution Compatible Out-of-Distribution Detection.

Density-driven Regularization for Out-of-distribution Detection

Out-of-Distribution Detection with Hilbert-Schmidt Independence Optimization

Out-of-Distribution Detection with Deep Nearest Neighbors

Advancing Out-of-Distribution Detection through Data Purification and Dynamic Activation Function Design

Boosting Out-of-distribution Detection with Typical Features

Detecting Out-of-distribution Data Through In-distribution Class Prior.

CASE: Exploiting Intra-class Compactness and Inter-class Separability of Feature Embeddings for Out-of-Distribution Detection

Going Beyond Conventional OOD Detection

GradOrth: A Simple yet Efficient Out-of-Distribution Detection with Orthogonal Projection of Gradients

Fast Decision Boundary based Out-of-Distribution Detector

Exploiting Discrepancy in Feature Statistic for Out-of-Distribution Detection

Characterizing Submanifold Region for Out-of-Distribution Detection