Abstract:IoT devices are becoming popular. Meanwhile, researchers are actively working on improving the security of IoT devices. However, previous works ignore the insecurity caused by a special category of devices, i.e., the End-of-Life (EoL) devices. Once a product becomes End-of-Life, vendors tend to no longer maintain its firmware or software, including fixing bugs and patching vulnerabilities. This makes EoL devices susceptible to attacks. For instance, a report showed that an EoL model with thousands of active devices was exploited to redirect web traffic for malicious purposes. In this paper, we conduct the first empirical study to shed light on the (in)security of EoL devices. To this end, our study performs two types of analysis, including the liveness analysis and the vulnerability analysis . The first one aims to detect the scale of EoL devices that are still alive in the wild. The second one is to evaluate the vulnerabilities existing in (active) EoL devices. We applied our approach to a large number of EoL models from three vendors (i.e., D-Link, Tp-Link, and Netgear) and detect the alive devices in a time period of more than two years . Our study reveals some worrisome facts that were unknown by the community. For instance, there exist a large number (more than 3 million) of active EoL devices. Some devices (more than 1 million) are still alive even after five years since EoL. Furthermore, more than half of the vulnerabilities (182 of 294) are discovered after the EoL date. Although vendors may release security patches after the EoL date, the process is ad hoc and incomplete, with only limited functionality. Furthermore, these patches can have side effects, such as providing valuable information to attackers. In summary, more than 2 million active EoL devices are vulnerable, and nearly half of them are threatened by high-risk vulnerabilities. Attackers can achieve a minimum of 8.67 Tbps DDoS attack by exploiting OS command injection vulnerabilities and compromising a large number of active EoL devices. We believe these facts pose a clear call for more attention to deal with the security issues of EoL devices.

A Horizontal Study on the Mixed IPID Assignment Vulnerability in the Linux Ecosystem

Off-Path TCP Hijacking Attacks via the Side Channel of Downgraded IPID

Off-Path TCP Exploits of the Mixed IPID Assignment

Exploiting Cross-Layer Vulnerabilities: Off-Path Attacks on the TCP/IP Protocol Suite

An Empirical Study on the Insecurity of End-of-Life (eol) IoT Devices

Exploiting Sequence Number Leakage: TCP Hijacking in NAT-Enabled Wi-Fi Networks

Off-Path Network Traffic Manipulation via Revitalized ICMP Redirect Attacks

ReDAN: An Empirical Study on Remote DoS Attacks against NAT Networks

Off-Path TCP Hijacking in Wi-Fi Networks: A Packet-Size Side Channel Attack

A Large-Scale Empirical Study on the Vulnerability of Deployed IoT Devices

Study on IP Hijack

Device Tracking via Linux's New TCP Source Port Selection Algorithm (Extended Version)

Detecting TCP/IP Connections via IPID Hash Collisions

An Empirical Study of High-Risk Vulnerabilities in IoT Systems

TuDoor Attack: Systematically Exploring and Exploiting Logic Vulnerabilities in DNS Response Pre-processing with Malformed Packets

Talking with Familiar Strangers: an Empirical Study on HTTPS Context Confusion Attacks

Understanding Fileless Attacks on Linux-based IoT Devices with HoneyCloud

Localhost detour from public to private networks: Vulnerabilities and mitigations

Off-Path Attacking the Web

The Hijackers Guide To The Galaxy: Off-Path Taking Over Internet Resources

Fast IPv6 Network Periphery Discovery and Security Implications