Abstract:This paper investigates the impacts of managers’ military experience on corporate risk-taking by adopting a sample of listed companies from 2004 to 2014, and examines the role of governmental intervention, MBA education experience of managers and industry. The results suggest that managers’ military experience may lead to more conservative but not aggressive corporate behaviors, like decreasing corporate risk-taking significantly, in particular for private firms. For firms located in regions with more severe intervention, the role of managers’ military experience on weakening corporate risk-taking is greater. Moreover, managers’ military experience may substitute the role of MBA education experience as for decreasing corporate risk-taking, that is, the effect is more significant when managers has no MBA education experience. For firms in non-regulated industry, the decreasing effect is more remarkable as for managers’ military experience on corporate risk-taking.This paper provides an alternative explanation for the effects of managers’ military experience on corporate behaviors or governance from the view of corporate risk-taking, which is good for understanding the real effects of managers’ military experience. Compared with the existing literature, the greatest contribution of this paper is to put forward different explanations from the perspective of risk-taking. According to the limited literature in China, military executives prefer risks and are more radical in financing. The research in this paper shows that the stock returns of the companies in which managers of military experience have less volatility, that is, the level of corporate risk-taking is lower. This means that explaining the impact of military experience on the management style and corporate decision-making needs more rigorous evidence from the perspective of making executives more radical and risk-prone. Based on the research conclusions, this paper can provide practical reference for executive selection and human resource management.

Manager Political Preferences and Company Investor Bases

The Stock Market Implication of Political Connections: Evidence from Firms' Dividend Policy

No. 008/2020/FIN Political Connection as an Investor Endorsement Device

Political Capital Vs. Constraint: Evidence from CEO Turnovers in Chinese Private Firms

Corporate Risk-Taking: Exploring the Effects of Government Affiliation and Executives' Incentives

Managerial Political Orientation and Stock Price Crash Risk

Shareholder Politics: The Influence of Investors' Political Affiliations on Corporate Social Responsibility

Study On The Managerial Risk Preference Of Chinese Listed Companies

Firm executive political leanings, Washington, and stock market returns

Conservative or Radical: the Influence of Managers' Military Experience on the Company's Risk-Taking

Local risk preference and corporate policies: evidence from M&A

Political Motivation, Over-Investment, and Firm Performance

Administrator-level Differences,Overconfidence and Corporate Investment Decisions

Political Connections and Accounting Conservatism:Evidence from Chinese Private Listed Firms

How Do the CEO Political Leanings Affect REIT Business Decisions?

Managerial Myopia and Long-Term Investment: Evidence from China

Mitigating Firm-Level Political Risk in China: the Role of Multiple Large Shareholders

Firm-level political sentiment and corporate tax avoidance

Institutional Environment,Managerial Power and Earning Conservatism

The management of political risk

Does executives' political identity improve firm financial performance? Evidence from China