Structural Rearrangement of Native and Processed Pea Starches Following Simulated Digestion in Vitro and Fermentation Characteristics of Their Resistant Starch Residues Using Human Fecal Inoculum.
Wenxin Cui,Zhen Ma,Xiaoping Li,Xinzhong Hu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.01.092
IF: 8.2
2021-01-01
International Journal of Biological Macromolecules
Abstract:Pea starches, in both native (NPS) and retrograded-autodaved forms (RAPS), were subjected to simulated gastrointestinal (GI) digestion in vitro, their multi-scale structural characteristics, morphological features, molecular distribution and thermal properties were characterized. A gradual increase in the short-/long-range crystallinity, melting enthalpy of gelatinization on increasing digestion time was observed for both the native and retrograded-autoclaved pea starch samples based on the X-ray diffraction, Fourier-transform infrared spectra, solid-state (CNMR)-C-13 and differential scanning calorimetry measurements. It was especially noticed that the growth rate of crystallinity and double helices, as well as the decrease in M-w values were evidently greater for RAPS than for NPS. To investigate how different molecular fine structure of pea starch substrate affects the gut microbiota shifts and dynamic short-chain fatty add profile, their resistant starch residues obtained from both native and retrograded-autoclaved pea starch after 8 h of simulated GI tract digestion was used as the fermentation substrate. The levels of acetate, propionate and butyrate gradually increased with the increasing fermentation time for NPS and RAPS. In comparison to the blank control (i.e., the group without the addition of carbohydrate), the fermented NIPS and RAPS obviously resulted in an increased abundance of Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes, accompanied by a decrease in Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria and Verrucomicrobia. Both NIPS and RAPS promoted different shifts in the microbial community at the genus level, with an increase in the abundance of Bacteroides, Megamonas and Bifidobacterium, as well as a reduction in the abundance of Fusobacterium, Faecalibacterium and Lachnoclostridium in comparison to the blank control samples. (C) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.