Abstract:To accurately estimate the rock shear strength parameters of cohesion (C) and friction angle (φ), triaxial tests must be carried out at different stress levels so that a failure envelope can be obtained to be linearized. However, this involves a higher budget and time requirements that are often unavailable at the early stage of a project. To address this problem, faster and more inexpensive indirect techniques such as artificial intelligence algorithms are under development. This paper first aims to utilize four machine learning techniques of Gaussian process regression (GPR), support vector regression (SVR), decision trees (DT), and long-short term memory (LSTM) to develop a predictive model to estimate parameters C and φ. To this aim, 244 datasets are available in the RockData software for intact Sandstone, including three input parameters of uniaxial compressive strength (UCS), uniaxial tensile strength (UTS), and confining stress (σ3) are employed in the models. The dropout technique is used to overcome the overfitting problem in LSTM-based models. A comprehensive evaluation is adopted for the performance indices of the prediction models. In this step, the most accurate results are produced by the LSTM model (C: R2 = 0.9842; RMSE = 1.295; MAPE = 0.009/φ: R2 = 0.8543; RMSE = 1.857; MAPE = 1.4301). In the second step, we improve the performance of the proposed LSTM model by fine-tuning the LSTM hyper-parameters, using six metaheuristic algorithms of grey wolf optimization (GWO), particle swarm optimization (PSO), social spider optimization (SSO), sine cosine algorithm (SCA), multiverse optimization (MVO), and moth flame optimization (MFO). The developed models' prediction performance for predicting parameter C from high to low was PSO-LSTM, GWO-LSTM, MVO-LSTM, MFO-LSTM, SCA-LSTM SSO-LSTM, and LSTM with ranking scores of 34, 29, 24, 21, 14, 12, and 5, respectively. Also, the models' prediction performance for predicting parameter φ from high to low was PSO-LSTM, GWO-LSTM, MVO-LSTM, MFO-LSTM, SCA-LSTM SSO-LSTM, and LSTM with ranking scores of 34, 31, 23, 18, 15, 14, and 5, respectively. However, the most robust results are produced by the PSO-LSTM model. Finally, the results indicate that applying a metaheuristic algorithm to tune the hyper-parameters of the LSTM model can significantly improve the prediction results. In the last step, the mutual information test method is applied to sensitivity analysis of the input parameters to predict parameters C and φ. Finally, it is revealed that parameters σ3 and UCS have the highest and lowest impact on the parameters C and φ, respectively.

Uniaxial Compressive Strength Prediction of Rocks Based on LSTM-Adaboost from Multi-Sources

Prediction of Uniaxial Compressive Strength in Rocks Based on Extreme Learning Machine Improved with Metaheuristic Algorithm

Machine learning methods for predicting the uniaxial compressive strength of the rocks: a comparative study

Uniaxial Compressive Strength Prediction for Rock Material in Deep Mine Using Boosting-Based Machine Learning Methods and Optimization Algorithms

Rock strength prediction based on machine learning: A study from prediction model to mechanism explanation

Machine learning for prediction of the uniaxial compressive strength within carbonate rocks

Unconfined compressive strength prediction of rock materials based on machine learning

Study on the Prediction of the Uniaxial Compressive Strength of Rock Based on the SSA-XGBoost Model

Prediction of Uniaxial Strength of Rocks Using Relevance Vector Machine Improved with Dual Kernels and Metaheuristic Algorithms

Influence of geological conditions of rock mass ahead of tunnel face on the prediction performance of uniaxial compressive strength prediction model

Predicting Triaxial Compressive Strength of High-Temperature Treated Rock Using Machine Learning Techniques

Machine Learning Techniques to Predict Rock Strength Parameters

Strength prediction and drillability identification for rock based on measurement while drilling parameters

Probabilistic Prediction of Uniaxial Compressive Strength for Rocks from Sparse Data Using Bayesian Gaussian Process Regression with Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique (SMOTE)

Prediction of Uniaxial Compression Strength of Limestone Based on the Point Load Strength and SVM Model

Developing Some Models to Predict the Uniaxial Compressive Strength of Various Sedimentary Rocks (case Studies: Large Dam Site and Mine in Southeast China)

A Comparative Study on the Development of Hybrid SSA-RF and PSO-RF Models for Predicting the Uniaxial Compressive Strength of Rocks

A Rock Mass Strength Prediction Method Integrating Wave Velocity and Operational Parameters Based on the Bayesian Optimization Catboost Algorithm

Unconfined compressive strength (UCS) prediction in real-time while drilling using artificial intelligence tools

Prediction Method of Rock Uniaxial Compressive Strength Based on Feature Optimization and SSA-XGBoost

Prediction of Uniaxial Compressive Strength of Rock Based on Lithology Using Stacking Models