Abstract:Differential privacy (DP), as a rigorous mathematical definition quantifying privacy leakage, has become a well-accepted standard for privacy protection. Combined with powerful machine learning (ML) techniques, differentially private machine learning (DPML) is increasingly important. As the most classic DPML algorithm, DP-SGD incurs a significant loss of utility, which hinders DPML's deployment in practice. Many studies have recently proposed improved algorithms based on DP-SGD to mitigate utility loss. However, these studies are isolated and cannot comprehensively measure the performance of improvements proposed in algorithms. More importantly, there is a lack of comprehensive research to compare improvements in these DPML algorithms across utility, defensive capabilities, and generalizability. We fill this gap by performing a holistic measurement of improved DPML algorithms on utility and defense capability against membership inference attacks (MIAs) on image classification tasks. We first present a taxonomy of where improvements are located in the ML life cycle. Based on our taxonomy, we jointly perform an extensive measurement study of the improved DPML algorithms, over twelve algorithms, four model architectures, four datasets, two attacks, and various privacy budget configurations. We also cover state-of-the-art label differential privacy (Label DP) algorithms in the evaluation. According to our empirical results, DP can effectively defend against MIAs, and sensitivity-bounding techniques such as per-sample gradient clipping play an important role in defense. We also explore some improvements that can maintain model utility and defend against MIAs more effectively. Experiments show that Label DP algorithms achieve less utility loss but are fragile to MIAs. ML practitioners may benefit from these evaluations to select appropriate algorithms. To support our evaluation, we implement a modular re-usable software, DPMLBench,(1) which enables sensitive data owners to deploy DPML algorithms and serves as a benchmark tool for researchers and practitioners.

Towards Sharper Excess Risk Bounds for Differentially Private Pairwise Learning

Towards Sharper Utility Bounds for Differentially Private Pairwise Learning

Differential Privacy for Pairwise Learning: Non-convex Analysis

Sharper Utility Bounds for Differentially Private Models: Smooth and Non-smooth

Secure Metric Learning Via Differential Pairwise Privacy

Output Perturbation for Differentially Private Convex Optimization: Faster and More General

Improving the Privacy and Practicality of Objective Perturbation for Differentially Private Linear Learners

Differentially private stochastic gradient descent with low-noise

Differentially Private Generalized Linear Models Revisited

Noninteractive Locally Private Learning of Linear Models via Polynomial Approximations

DPMLBench: Holistic Evaluation of Differentially Private Machine Learning

Differentially Private Worst-group Risk Minimization

Faster Rates of Private Stochastic Convex Optimization

Differentially Private SGD with Non-Smooth Losses

Differentially Private Learning with Small Public Data.

Stochastic Differentially Private and Fair Learning

A general differentially private learning framework for decentralized data

Differential Private Stochastic Optimization with Heavy-tailed Data: Towards Optimal Rates

Individual Privacy Accounting for Differentially Private Stochastic Gradient Descent

Private Stochastic Non-Convex Optimization: Adaptive Algorithms and Tighter Generalization Bounds

Differentially Private Learning Beyond the Classical Dimensionality Regime