Understanding of Dynamic Contacting Behaviors of Underwater Gas Bubbles on Solid Surfaces
Jingshan Qin,Daojin Zhou,Bairu Shi,Fanhong Chen,Liang Luo,Anuj Kumar,Cheng Wang,Xiao Lin,Siyu Sheng,Wenwen Xu,Zhicheng Shang,Congtian Cheng,Yun Kuang,Wen-Feng Lin,Haijun Xu,Xiaoming Sun
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.0c01551
IF: 3.9
2020-08-31
Langmuir
Abstract:Understanding of dynamic behaviors of gas bubbles on solid surfaces has significant impacts on gas-involving electrochemical reactions, mineral flotation, and so on in industry. Contact angle (θ) is widely employed to characterize the wetting behaviors of bubbles on solid surfaces; however, it usually fluctuates within the bubble's advancing (θ<sub>a</sub>) and receding (θ<sub>r</sub>) range. Although the term of most-stable contact angle (θ<sub>ms</sub>) was defined previously as the closest valuable approximation for thermodynamically meaningful contact angle for a droplet on a solid surface, it has not been widely studied; and the precise θ<sub>ms</sub> measurement methods are inadequate to describe bubbles' wetting behaviors on solid surfaces. Herein, we proposed to take θ<sub>ms</sub> as the mean value of θ<sub>a</sub> and θ<sub>r</sub>, as a more accurate descriptor of gas bubbles' dynamic behaviors on nonideal solid surfaces, similar to the definition of droplets' θ<sub>ms</sub> on solid surfaces. The feasibility and accuracy of the proposed θ<sub>ms</sub> have been evidenced by recording the bubbles' contacting behaviors on solid surfaces with varied wettabilities. In addition, it was found that the contact angle hysteresis (δ), as the difference between θ<sub>a</sub> and θ<sub>r,</sub> reached its maximum value when θ<sub>ms</sub> approached 90°, regardless of the roughness (<i>r</i>) of the substrates. Finally, built on the above concept, the lateral adhesion force (<i>f</i>) of the gas bubble on the solid interface, which worked on the three-phase contact line (TPCL) of an individual bubble on a solid surface against its lateral motion during the bubble advancing or receding process, was described quantitatively by combining θ<sub>a</sub>, θ<sub>r</sub>, and the liquid–gas interfacial tension (γ<sub>lg</sub>). Experimental and theoretical data jointly confirmed that <i>f</i> reached its maximum value at θ<sub>ms</sub> ∼ 90°, namely, a "super-sticky" state, which described the dynamically most sluggish movement of the bubble along the solid surface.The Supporting Information is available free of charge at <a class="ext-link" href="/doi/10.1021/acs.langmuir.0c01551?goto=supporting-info">https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.langmuir.0c01551</a>.Snapshots of underwater gas bubble's contact angle (θ), advancing contact angle (θ<sub>a</sub>), and receding contact angle (θ<sub>r</sub>), pinned on a given flat Au film surface (Figure S1); snapshots of underwater gas bubble's contact angles pinned on the Au film surfaces with different wettability states (Figure S2); SEM images of structured silicon wafer patterned surfaces with different sizes; typically, the embossment widths and the groove depths are 10 μm and the groove widths (w) are 20, 40, 60, and 80 μm as shown in (a)–(d), respectively (Figure S3); (a) plots of δ with θ<sub>ms</sub> from different viewing directions on F-Si pattern surfaces. The red points are the results of observing vertical to grooves and the blue points are the results of observing parallel to grooves. (b) The side view of the structured silicon surfaces. Typically, the embossment widths and the groove depths are 10 μm conformably, the groove widths (w) are 20, 40, 60, and 80 μm. (c) Abridged general view and snapshots of underwater gas bubbles from different viewing directions on the structured silicon surface with <i>r</i> = 1.40 (Figure S4); snapshots of underwater gas bubbles with various θ, θ<sub>a</sub>, and θ<sub>r</sub> on the Au film surfaces with different wettabilities (Figure S5); sliding distance (<i>L</i>) within 5 s of underwater gas bubbles on vertical Au film surfaces with different θ<sub>ms</sub>: (a) 143.5°, (b) 133.6°, (c) 73.7°, and (d) 67.0°. The deduction of θ<sub>ms</sub> as a mean value of θ<sub>a</sub> and θ<sub>r</sub> describing the wettability of the gas–solid interface.The deduction of advancing lateral adhesion force (<i>f</i>'<sub>a</sub>) and the receding lateral adhesion force (<i>f</i>'<sub>r</sub>) on rough surfaces (Figure S6) (<a class="ext-link" href="/doi/suppl/10.1021/acs.langmuir.0c01551/suppl_file/la0c01551_si_001.pdf">PDF</a>)Measurement of bubble sliding distance on the Au film surface with the θ<sub>ms</sub> = 52.9° (Supporting Movie 1) (<a class="ext-link" href="/doi/suppl/10.1021/acs.langmuir.0c01551/suppl_file/la0c01551_si_002.mp4">MP4</a>)Measurement of bubble sliding distance on the Au film surface with the θ<sub>ms</sub> = 105.4° (Supporting Movie 2) (<a class="ext-link" href="/doi/suppl/10.1021/acs.langmuir.0c01551/suppl_file/la0c01551_si_003.mp4">MP4</a>)Measurement of bubble sliding distance on the Au film surface with the θ<sub>ms</sub> = 158.3°(Supporting Movie 3) (<a class="ext-link" href="/doi/suppl/10.1021/acs.langmuir.0c01551/suppl_file/la0c01551_si_004.mp4">MP4</a>)This article has not yet been cited by other publications.
chemistry, multidisciplinary, physical,materials science