Clinical Characteristics, Outcomes, and Risk Stratification of Combined Mitral and Tricuspid Regurgitation

Junxing Lv,Qianhong Lu,Weiwei Wang,Yunqing Ye,Zhe Li,Bin Zhang,Qinghao Zhao,Haitong Zhang,Qingrong Liu,Zhenyan Zhao,Bincheng Wang,Zikai Yu,Shuai Guo,Zhenya Duan,Yanyan Zhao,Runlin Gao,Haiyan Xu,Junbo Ge,Yongjian Wu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacasi.2024.07.009
2024-01-01
JACC Asia
Abstract:Background Combined mitral regurgitation (MR) and tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is related to more complicated hemodynamic burdens than isolated atrioventricular valve regurgitation. Objectives This study aimed to investigate clinical characteristics and outcomes of combined MR and TR, as well as developing dedicated prognostic instruments. Methods A total of 6,704 patients with ≥ moderate MR or TR from the China Valvular Heart Disease study were included in this analysis. The study outcomes included all-cause mortality, death or hospitalization for heart failure, and worsening functional status or death within 2 years. Results Compared with those with isolated valvular regurgitation, patients with combined MR and TR more often experienced atrial fibrillation or flutter and pulmonary hypertension. During a median follow-up of 733 days (Q1, Q3: 706, 749 days), 624 (9.3%) deaths occurred. Combined MR and TR was related to poorer 2-year outcomes than isolated MR, and was independently associated with worse prognosis in symptomatic patients (all-cause mortality: MR vs MR+TR, HR: 0.776 [95% CI: 0.616-0.978]; P = 0.031) and those with normal left ventricular systolic function (composite endpoint: HR: 0.629 [95% CI: 0.400-0.990]; P = 0.045). Based on carefully evaluated predictors of mortality, a prognostic nomogram and a risk score were developed and externally validated for patients with combined MR and TR, with superior predictive performance than the MitraScore and comparable discrimination compared with artificial intelligence-derived models. Conclusions Patients with combined MR and TR displayed worse clinical profiles and poorer outcomes compared with those with isolated MR. The novel prognostic tools may improve personalized risk assessment of combined MR and TR.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?