Abstract:As artificial intelligence (AI) techniques are becoming more popular in landslide modeling, it is important to understand how decisions are made. Fairness, and transparency becomes ever more vital due to ethical concerns and trust. Despite the popularity of machine learning (ML) algorithms in landslide modeling, the explainability of these methods are often considered as black box. This paper aims to propose an explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) for landslide prediction using synthetic-aperture radar (SAR) time-series data, NDVI (normalized difference vegetation index) time-series data and other geo-environmental factors such as DEM (digital elevation model) derivatives. We employed a Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) approach to understand how and what decisions ML-based models are making. 37 features were extracted from various sources such as ALOS-PALSAR (ALOS Phased Array type L-band Synthetic Aperture Radar), ALOS-2 (SAR), Landsat-8, topographic maps, and DEM for landslide susceptibility mapping in a landslide prone area in Chukha, Bhutan as a test site. The result was then compared using two standard ML methods: random forest (RF) and support vector machine (SVM). As per results, the RF model outperformed (0.914) the SVM. Moreover, the higher reliability of the RF model was proved by the area under the curve (AUC) of 0.941. XAI results revealed, features like altitude, aspect, NDVI-2014, NDVI-2017, and NDVI-2018 were the most effective features for landslide prediction by both models. Interestingly, among those features, NDVI-2014, aspect, and NDVI-2017 negatively correlated with the landslide prediction; whereas positively correlated when SVM was utilized. This interpretation ability indicates the advantages of XAI over the conventional methods as it measures the impact, interaction and correlation of conditioning factors within a model. The current research finding can provide more transparency and explainability when working with MLs in landslide studies. This could help to build trust among the geoscientists and decision-makers while making geohazard prediction.

A Causality-Erasing Baseline Values of SHAP Method for Enhancing Explainable Deep Networks in SAR Target Classification

Deep Neural Network Explainability Enhancement via Causality-Erasing SHAP Method for SAR Target Recognition

Manifold-based Shapley for SAR Recognization Network Explanation

Explainable Analysis of Deep Learning Methods for SAR Image Classification

SHAP values for Explaining CNN-based Text Classification Models

Balanced background and explanation data are needed in explaining deep learning models with SHAP: An empirical study on clinical decision making

A Human-Grounded Evaluation of SHAP for Alert Processing

Discovering and Explaining the Non-Causality of Deep Learning in SAR ATR

Shap-CAM: Visual Explanations for Convolutional Neural Networks Based on Shapley Value.

On the use of explainable AI for susceptibility modeling: Examining the spatial pattern of SHAP values

Generating Counterfactual and Contrastive Explanations using SHAP

Enhancing the Interpretability of SHAP Values Using Large Language Models

Explainable, Physics Aware, Trustworthy AI Paradigm Shift for Synthetic Aperture Radar

Discovering and Explaining the Noncausality of Deep Learning in SAR ATR

Uncertainty Exploration: Toward Explainable SAR Target Detection

A Novel Method using Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)-based Shapley Additive Explanations for Spatial Landslide Prediction using Time-Series SAR dataset

DeepCSHAP: Utilizing Shapley Values to Explain Deep Complex-Valued Neural Networks

BSED: Baseline Shapley-Based Explainable Detector

Manifold-based Shapley explanations for high dimensional correlated features

On the Failings of Shapley Values for Explainability

Analyzing deep reinforcement learning model decisions with Shapley additive explanations for counter drone operations