CEO Power and Strategic Persistence: Evidence from Post-Ipo Firms in China

Tang Wang,Dirk Libaers,Hao Jiao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-024-00967-3
IF: 7.096
2024-01-01
Small Business Economics
Abstract:We draw on several lines of literatures to develop a new theory on how CEO power can lead to strategic persistence in a set of new firms that are routinely touted as nimble and agile. IPOs may trigger strategic changes in organizational goals and boundaries. However, prior studies have shown that past organizational success can lead to strategic persistence—the tendency for firms to stick with strategies that yielded success in the past. We propose that one variable—CEO power—may explain why some post-IPO firms retain their strategic posture whereas others deviate from it. Using unique samples of new post-IPO firms in China, we find a positive relationship between CEO power and strategic persistence. This effect is positively moderated by firm diversification and the CEO’s political capital. We employ a multi-method approach and find consistent results across different samples and approaches. We conclude with a discussion of the implications of our findings. Do powerful CEOs maintain the strategic posture of their firms after an IPO? This study reveals that firms headed by powerful CEOs tend to pursue strategic persistence in the post-IPO period. We argue that powerful CEOs tend to restrict themselves to information that formed the basis for successful strategies in the past. We found that powerful CEOs adopt strategies that are consistent with past strategies even when the firm has diversified into other businesses. In addition, the political capital of powerful CEOs may also further entrench them in their jobs, help out with removing regulatory obstacles, and protect the powerful CEO from being demoted or dismissed. Our findings have important implications for practice in that powerful CEOs are less flexible in their strategic behavior even after a transformational event like an IPO. In order to make the firm more agile, a more balanced governance of the firm is recommended.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?