A Petrogenetic Study of Apatite in Chang’E-5 Basalt: Implications for High Sulfur Contents in Lunar Apatite and Volatile Estimations for the Lunar Mantle

Huijuan Li,Zilong Wang,Zhenyu Chen,Wei Tian,Wei-(RZ) Wang,Guibin Zhang,Lifei Zhang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2024.09.002
IF: 5
2024-01-01
Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta
Abstract:Apatite is ubiquitous in lunar samples and has been used widely for estimating volatile abundances in the lunar interior. However, apatite compositional and isotopic variations within and between samples have resulted in varying and ambiguous results. Understanding apatite petrogenesis will help with both identifying the appropriate composition for volatile estimation and interpreting isotopic variations. Here we report a comprehensive petrogenetic investigation of apatite in Chang'E-5 (CE5) basaltic sample CE5C0800YJYX013GP. Apatite displays both intra-grain and inter-grain compositional variations with F and Cl contents falling in the ranges of 0.97-2.47 wt% and 0.24-1.09 wt%, respectively. These apatite compositions show relatively low F and high Cl characteristics in comparison to apatites of Apollo high-Ti and low-Ti mare basalts, but are similar to those reported for lunar meteorites LAP 04841 and MIL 05035. We discern three zoning profiles: fractional crystallization (FC)-dominated, degassing-induced and a third indicated by REE-enriched cores, which are interpreted as representing different generations of apatite. FC-dominated zoning is characterized with decreasing F and increasing Cl and S contents from core to rim; while the opposite is true for the degassing-induced zoning. Regardless of the zoning patterns, apatite Cl and S contents display positive correlations, with S contents up to similar to 3000 ppm, much higher than previous reports for Apollo samples (up to similar to 600 ppm). We demonstrate that the fractional crystallization model proposed by Boyce et al. (2014) in combination with H2O degassing and high S contents in melt (likely at sulfide saturation) can explain these high Cl and S contents observed in CE5 apatite. Based on the core composition of the FC-dominated zoning profile, which has the lowest incompatible element concentrations, bulk F, Cl and H2O contents in the parental melt are estimated to be similar to 72 +/- 21, similar to 43 +/- 14 and similar to 1576 +/- 518 ppm, respectively. These estimates have lower F/Cl ratios than those measured in olivine-hosted melt inclusions from Apollo mare basalts. By adopting the petrogenetic model for CE5 basalt proposed by Su et al. (2022), i.e., 10 % partial melting of a hybrid mantle source, followed by similar to 30-70 % fractional crystallization (similar to 50 % for our sample), we estimate the F, Cl, H2O and S contents in the mantle source are in the ranges of similar to 2.5-4.6, similar to 0.7-1.4, similar to 53-105 and similar to 38-125 ppm, respectively, similar to estimates for both depleted Earth mantle and primitive lunar mantle. However, by adopting the model of Tian et al. (2021), 2-3 % partial melting of a mantle source composed of 86 PCS+2% TIRL (PCS, percent crystallized solid; TIRL, trapped instantaneous residual liquid), followed by 43-88 % fractional crystallization, these estimates will be 5-10 times lower. To be certain whether the relatively low F and high Cl characteristics of CE5 apatite imply an enriched mantle source requires further evaluation of the petrogenetic models for CE5 basalt.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?