Outcomes of Radical Radiotherapy for the Treatment of Localized Renal Pelvic and Ureteral Carcinoma Intolerant to Surgery: a Real-World Study

Ming-Zhu Liu,Xiao-Ying Li,Xian-Shu Gao,Feng Lyu,Ming-Wei Ma,Jia-Yan Chen,Yan Gao,Xue-Ying Ren,Xue-Song Li
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clgc.2024.102216
IF: 3.121
2024-01-01
Clinical Genitourinary Cancer
Abstract:To investigate the safety and efficacy of radiotherapy for localized inoperable renal pelvic and ureteral carcinoma, we retrospectively analyzed 23 patients. We find that for patients with localized inoperable renal pelvic and ureteral carcinoma, radiotherapy is well-tolerable with high local control and expected to bring survival benefits. Our study shows that radiotherapy may be an option when surgery is unsuitable. Purpose: To investigate the safety and efficacy of radical radiotherapy for localized inoperable renal pelvic and ureteral carcinoma. Methods: 23 patients who received radiotherapy were enrolled. The prescribed dose was 60 to 67.5 Gy in 25 fractions and for bulky tumors, SABR was used in the first 3 to 5 times with tumor center boosted synchronously with 6 to 8 Gy/f. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate local control (LC), DMFS, CSS and OS. Univariate analysis was performed by the log-rank test. The change in the eGFR before and after radiotherapy was compared by paired t test. The side effects were graded by CTCAE, version 5.0. Results: The median follow-up time was 17 months. The LC rates at 2 years after radiotherapy were 85.0%; the DMFS rates were 52.2%; the CSS rates were 83.0%; and the OS rates were 77.8%. The main failure mode after radiotherapy was distant metastasis. Univariate analysis revealed that T3-4 stage (P = .001), N+ status (P < .001) and a tumor volume >= 20 cc (P = .005) were poor prognostic factors for DMFS. There was no significant difference in the mean eGFR before and after radiotherapy (47.0 mL/min/1.73m(2) vs. 48.5 mL/min/1.73m(2), P = .632). Only 1 patient developed acute grade 3 anemia. No patients developed grade 3 or higher late toxicities. Conclusion: For localized inoperable renal pelvic and ureteral carcinoma, radiotherapy is well tolerable with high local control and expected to bring survival benefits. In such patients, radiotherapy may be an option when surgery is unsuitable.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?