Reproductive Outcomes of High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Ablation and Myomectomy in Women with Uterine Fibroids: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Yishan Chen,Jingsong Yi,Shunhe Lin,Xi Xie,Xishi Liu,Sun-Wei Guo
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2024.104436
IF: 4.567
2024-01-01
Reproductive BioMedicine Online
Abstract:Research question Does high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) ablation have comparable reproductive outcomes to myomectomy for patients with uterine fibroids (UF)? . Design A systematic review and a meta-analysis of data extracted from published studies up to March, 2024. Results Through a more structured analysis, we found that HIFU treatment yielded a pooled PR of 23.3% (95% confidence interval (CI) = 11.5%–37.6%) and a pooled LBR of 17.3% (95% CI = 7.8%–29.3%), significantly lower than those after myomectomy, which had a pooled PR of 56.9% (95%CI=45.6%–67.9%) and a pooled LBR of 44.1% (95% CI= 34.9%–53.4%) (p=0.0001 and p=0.0003, respectively). After controlling for patient age, USgHIFU studies reported significantly lower PR and LBR compared to myomectomy. Moreover, studies enrolling younger patients and explicitly recruiting those desiring to conceive reported better reproductive outcomes. Conclusions HIFU treatment for UF patients desiring to preserve their uteri resulted in poorer reproductive outcomes compared to myomectomy. Although UF is now the number one disease that receives HIFU treatment worldwide, the overall quality in design and execution of HIFU studies on reproductive outcomes for UF women leaves much room for improvement. Above all, comparative trials against the standard of care are badly needed.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?