Abstract:Biostimulants sprayed exogenously boost crop yield and quality. However, the effects of the co-application of biostimulants and fertilizers as base fertilizers in soil are still uncertain. The objective of this study was to investigate the overall effects of reducing N levels in conjunction with the application of biostimulants on the yield formation and N utilization of wheat and maize. Therefore, based on the winter wheat–summer maize rotation system in the modern R&D base of Sichuan Agricultural University, soil enzyme activities, soil inorganic nitrogen dynamic content, crop nitrogen accumulation and transportation, crop yields, and composition were determined. To achieve this, a total of nine treatments were established based on the winter wheat–summer maize rotation system. The experiment included the following treatments: no fertilization (CK0); one-time application of common compound fertilizer (CK1, applied at a rate of 225 kg ha−1); common compound fertilizer as base fertilizer + urea as topdressing fertilizer (CK2, applied at a rate of 225 kg ha−1, base/topdressing, 6/4); biostimulant + common compound fertilizer with 20% or 30% N reduction (jf-20%, jf-30%); biostimulant chelated urea-formaldehyde fertilizer reducing N by 20%, 30%, or 40% (jn-20%, jn-30%, or jn-40%); and biostimulant chelated urea-formaldehyde fertilizer reducing N by 40% and combined with organic fertilizer, thereby totally reducing N by 27% (jny-27%). The results demonstrated that the application of a biostimulant increased the activities of urease, nitrate reductase, and nitrite reductase in the soil of wheat and maize during the flowering stage. At the same time, the amount of residual nitrate and ammonium N in the soil at maturity was reduced. Furthermore, when N application was appropriately reduced, wheat and maize plants treated with jf, jn, and jny showed a significant increase in N assimilation after the flowering stage, resulting in higher N accumulation in the grains at maturity and ultimately improving the yield compared to CK1 and CK2. The combined use of biostimulants also had a significant positive impact on N use efficiency (NUE). During the two-year period, the NUE in the wheat season showed an increase ranging from 6.70% to 24.00% compared to CK1 and from 5.30% to 22.60% compared to CK2. Similarly, in the maize season, the NUE increased by a range of 11.60% to 22.57% compared to CK1 and from 11.78% to 22.75% compared to CK2. Overall, biostimulants enhanced N absorption and transportation by matching crop N requirements in the mid-to-late stages and improved NUE and yield under appropriate N reduction. This study contributes to the design of improved measures for N reduction and yield stabilization in order to promote sustainable agricultural development.

Blending of Slow-Release N Fertilizer and Urea Improve Rainfed Maize Yield, Nitrogen Use Efficiency While Reducing Apparent N Loss

Blending Urea and Slow-Release Nitrogen Fertilizer Increases Dryland Maize Yield and Nitrogen Use Efficiency While Mitigating Ammonia Volatilization.

Effects of Slow-Release Nitrogen Fertilizer and Urea Blending on Maize Growth and Nitrogen Uptake Under Different Nitrogen Application Rates

Growth, grain yield, water and nitrogen use efficiency of rainfed maize in response to straw mulching and urea blended with slow-release nitrogen fertilizer: A two-year field study

Effects of the combined application of slow-release urea and urea on activities of key enzymes related to nitrogen me-tabolism and nitrogen utilization of maize

Coupling Effects of Irrigation Amount and Nitrogen Fertilizer Type on Grain Yield, Water Productivity and Nitrogen Use Efficiency of Drip-Irrigated Maize

Effects of Nitrogen Type on Rainfed Maize Nutrient Uptake and Grain Yield

Synchronizing Nitrogen Supply and Uptake by Rainfed Maize Using Mixed Urea and Slow-Release Nitrogen Fertilizer

Enhancing nitrogen use efficiency and yield of maize (Zea mays L.) through Ammonia volatilization mitigation and nitrogen management approaches

Comprehensive Effects of N Reduction Combined with Biostimulants on N Use Efficiency and Yield of the Winter Wheat–Summer Maize Rotation System

Response of maize yield and nitrogen leaching to combining controlled-release urea and normal urea under different surface mulching

Maize leaf functional responses to blending urea and slow-release nitrogen fertilizer under various drip irrigation regimes

Effects of Urea-Ammonium Nitrate Solution on Yield, N2O Emission, and Nitrogen Efficiency of Summer Maize Under Integration of Water and Fertilizer

Can the Blended Application of Controlled-Release and Common Urea Effectively Replace the Common Urea in a Wheat-Maize Rotation System? A Case Study Based on a Long-Term Experiment

Combining Time-Variable Controlled Release Urea Formulations to Improve Spring Maize Yield and Reduce Nitrogen Losses in Northeastern China

Optimising the root traits of summer maize to improve nutrient uptake and utilisation through rational application of urea ammonium nitrate solution

Optimal Effects of Combined Application of Nitrate and Ammonium Nitrogen Fertilizers with a Ratio of 3:1 on Grain Yield and Water Use Efficiency of Maize Sowed in Ridge–Furrow Plastic Film Mulching in Northwest China

Optimizing Nitrogen Application Patterns and Amounts to Improve Maize Yield and Water-Nitrogen Use Efficiencies in the Loess Plateau of China: A Meta-Analysis

Enhancing Maize Yield and Resource Efficiency through Controlled-Release Nitrogen Fertilization on the Semiarid Loess Plateau

Effect of different rates of slow/controlled release urea on nitrogen content in spring maize in loess highlands

Combined Effects of Urea Type and Placement Depth on Grain Yield, Water Productivity and Nitrogen Use Efficiency of Rain-Fed Spring Maize in Northern China