Abstract:The newly emerged machine learning（ML） methods have been widely applied to various applications, and have become a strong driving force to revolutionize a wide range of industries, which have greatly promoted the prosperity and development of artificial intelligence. Meanwhile, the training and inference of the machine learning model are based on a large amount of data, which always contains some private information. And the privacy and security of the ML has faced serious challenges. Membership inference attacks（MIAs） mainly aim to infer whether a data record was used to train a target model or not. MIAs have not only been shown to be effective on various ML models（e.g., classification models and generative models）, but also have been penetrated into the fields of image classification, speech recognition, natural language processing, computer vision and so on, which creates a great security threat to the long-term development of machine learning.Therefore, in order to better improve the security of ML models for membership inference attacks, in this paper, we systematically introduce and analyze the basic principles and characteristics of the MIAs and their defenses from a ML attack-defense perspective. Firstly, we introduce the definitions and threat models of the MIAs, and classify these MIAs from six different perspectives such as attacks’ principles, scenarios, background knowledge, target models, fields and the size of attack datasets, and we compare their advantages and disadvantages. Secondly, we summary the reasons caused the MIAs from three aspects, namely diversity of training data, types of target models and overfitting of target models. Thirdly, we survey defensive techniques for MIAs as well as their characteristics by differential privacy, regularization, data argumentation,model stacking, early stopping, confidence score masking and knowledge distillation. Futhermore, we institute the evaluation metrics and datasets used in MIAs, and the other applications of the MIAs. Finally, by comparing and analyzing the existing MIAs and their defenses, we discuss the challenges and future research directions.

Balancing Privacy and Attack Utility: Calibrating Sample Difficulty for Membership Inference Attacks in Transfer Learning

You Only Query Once: an Efficient Label-Only Membership Inference Attack

Learning-Based Difficulty Calibration for Enhanced Membership Inference Attacks

Is Difficulty Calibration All We Need? Towards More Practical Membership Inference Attacks

TransMIA: Membership Inference Attacks Using Transfer Shadow Training

Practical Blind Membership Inference Attack via Differential Comparisons

Privacy Analysis of Deep Learning in the Wild: Membership Inference Attacks against Transfer Learning

When Fairness Meets Privacy: Exploring Privacy Threats in Fair Binary Classifiers via Membership Inference Attacks

Practical Membership Inference Attack Against Collaborative Inference in Industrial IoT

A Method to Facilitate Membership Inference Attacks in Deep Learning Models

Practical Membership Inference Attacks against Fine-tuned Large Language Models via Self-prompt Calibration

Defending Privacy Against More Knowledgeable Membership Inference Attackers

Resisting membership inference attacks through knowledge distillation

On the Discredibility of Membership Inference Attacks

Membership Privacy for Machine Learning Models Through Knowledge Transfer

Overconfidence is a Dangerous Thing: Mitigating Membership Inference Attacks by Enforcing Less Confident Prediction

HP-MIA: A Novel Membership Inference Attack Scheme for High Membership Prediction Precision

Membership reconstruction attack in deep neural networks

Asurvey on membership inference attacks and defenses in Machine Learning

Advancing Membership Inference Attacks: the Present and the Future

Defense Against Membership Inference Attacks on Imbalanced Dataset Using Generated Data