LLM-Based Empathetic Response Through Psychologist-Agent Debate

Yijie Wu,Shi Feng,Ming Wang,Daling Wang,Yifei Zhang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-7232-2_14
2024-01-01
Abstract:Empathetic Response has been a significant proportion of natural language processing research. Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown great potential in generating empathetic responses. But currently, many research only use a single LLM to generate responses. For empathetic responses, the approach of using a single LLM with single-turn has a problem, which is the lack of utilizing the capability of multiple LLMs for debate. Just like humans, they require multiple conversation to address issues. In addition, previous tasks have overlooked the role of different psychological schools in empathetic responses. Different psychological schools use different methods to treat users, such as Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy (CBT), Psychodynamic Therapy (PT), and Humanistic Therapy (HT). Different schools have their own strengths in addressing psychological issues. The current issue with using LLMs for empathetic responses is the lack of integration of different schools of psychology and multiple rounds. To address this issue, we propose a psychologist-agent-based multi-turn dialogue framework. This framework comprises a group of arguers with preferences of different psychological schools, used in discussion and response generation, and a decision maker lacking preferences for determining the final response. The framework, utilizing multiple LLMs supplemented by psychological schools, naturally addresses the aforementioned challenges. Besides, we proposed an LLM-based method for evaluating empathetic responses. Experiments on the EMPATHETICDIALOGUES demonstrated the effectiveness of our approach.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?