Metrics for quantifying the efficiency of atmospheric CO2 reduction by marine carbon dioxide removal (mCDR)

Kana Yamamoto,Tim DeVries,David A Siegel
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ad7477
IF: 6.7
2024-08-31
Environmental Research Letters
Abstract:Marine carbon dioxide removal (mCDR) is gaining interest as a tool to meet global climate goals. Because the response of the ocean-atmosphere system to mCDR takes years to centuries, modeling is required to assess the impact of mCDR on atmospheric CO2¬ reduction. Here, we use a coupled ocean-atmosphere model to quantify the atmospheric CO2 reduction in response to a CDR perturbation. We define two metrics to characterize the atmospheric CO2 response to both instantaneous ocean alkalinity enhancement (OAE) and direct air capture (DAC): the cumulative additionality (α) measures the reduction in atmospheric CO2 relative to the magnitude of the CDR perturbation, while the relative efficiency () quantifies the cumulative additionality of mCDR relative to that of DAC. For DAC, α is 100% immediately following CDR deployment, but declines to roughly 50% by 100 years post-deployment as the ocean degasses CO2 in response to the removal of carbon from the atmosphere. For instantaneous OAE, α is zero initially and reaches a maximum of 40-90% several years to decades later, depending on regional CO2 equilibration rates and ocean circulation processes. The global mean  approaches 100% after 40 years, showing that instantaneous OAE is nearly as effective as DAC after several decades. However, there are significant geographic variations, with  approaching 100% most rapidly in the low latitudes while  stays well under 100% for decades to centuries near deep and intermediate water formation sites. These metrics provide a quantitative framework for evaluating sequestration timescales and carbon market valuation that can be applied to any mCDR strategy.
environmental sciences,meteorology & atmospheric sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?