Abstract:Background: We previously showed that adding a mucosectomy cap (MH-597, Olympus) to a conventional colonoscope (cap-assisted colonoscopy or CAC) increased the completion rate when conventional colonoscopy (CC) failed (J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2005:20:A193). Aim: To compare the performance of CC versus CAC. Patients and methods: Patients undergoing colonoscopy were randomized to receive CC or CAC. All procedures were performed by experienced endoscopist who had more than 3 years' experience. Patients were excluded if they had prior colonoscopy, colorectal surgery, a history of colonic stricture, acute surgical conditions, or clinical features of intestinal obstruction. The primary endpoints were the rate of complete examination, cecal and terminal ileal intubation time, and total colonoscopy time. Secondary endpoints included endoscopist satisfaction and difficulty of performing polypectomy (0-not difficult, 10-most difficult), and patient's pain score (0-not painful, 10-most painful) using a 10-point visual analog scale. Results: 404 patients were recruited (table). The baseline characteristics were comparable. The cecal intubation time and total colonoscopy time were significantly shorter in the CAC group than in the CC group. Failure in cecal intubation that was related to colonic looping and banding occurred more frequently in CC (n = 8) than CAC group (n = 4). Conclusions: CAC could improve the performance of colonoscopy even among experienced colonoscopists. Tabled 1 CAC (n = 204) CC (n = 200) P Presence of polyp (n, %) 69 (33.8%) 75 (37.5%) N.S. Cancer (n, %) 10 (4.9%) 8 (4.0%) N.S. Complete colonoscopy rate (n, %) 195 (95.6%) 191 (95.5%) N.S. (Among 1st successful cases) CAC (N = 195) CC (n = 191) Cecal intubation time (minute, mean +/− SD) 6.1 +/− 4.0 7.7 +/− 5.4 0.01 Total colonoscopy time (minute, mean +/− SD) 14.1 +/− 8.1 15.7 +/− 8.3 0.049 Terminal ileal intubation (n, %) 153 (78.5%) 157 (82.2%) N.S. Endoscopist satisfaction (mean +/− SD) 2.4 +/− 2.1 2.6 +/− 2.2 N.S. Difficulty of polypectomy (mean +/− SD) 1.9 +/− 1.8 1.7 +/− 1.9 N.S. Patient's pain score (mean +/− SD) 3.0 +/− 2.7 3.2 +/− 2.6 N.S. Open table in a new tab

Endocuff‐assisted Colonoscopy Versus Cap‐assisted Colonoscopy for Adenoma Detection Rate: A Meta‐analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Comparison of colon adenoma detection rates using cap-assisted and Endocuff-assisted colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial

Cuff-assisted versus cap-assisted colonoscopy for adenoma detection: results of a randomized study

Stability of 17D yellow fever virus vaccine using different stabilizers.

Randomized control trial of adenoma detection rate in Endocuff‐assisted colonoscopy versus transparent hood‐assisted colonoscopy

Higher Adenoma Detection Rates with Endocuff-Assisted Colonoscopy – A Randomized Controlled Multicenter Trial

Endocuff With Or Without Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Colonoscopy In Detection Of Colorectal Adenoma: A Randomized Colonoscopy Trial

Endocuff®-assisted colonoscopy increases polyp detection rate: a simulated randomized study involving an anatomic colorectal model and 32 international endoscopists

Mo1563 CAP-Assisted Colonoscopy Versus Standard Colonoscopy in Polyp Detection and Cecal Intubation Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis of Randomised-Controlled Trials

The Efficacy of Cap-Assisted Colonoscopy in Polyp Detection and Cecal Intubation: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Improved adenoma detection rate using a novel colonoscopic distal attachment: a multicenter randomized controlled trial

Standard versus Endocuff versus cap-assisted colonoscopy for adenoma detection: A randomised controlled clinical trial

Cap-assisted colonoscopy versus standard colonoscopy: is the cap beneficial? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Efficacy of Artificial Intelligence in Reducing Miss Rates of GI Adenomas, Polyps, and Sessile Serrated Lesions: a Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Comparison of preoperative pain and medication use in emergency patients presenting with irreversible pulpitis or teeth with necrotic pulps.

A Randomized Controlled Study Comparing Cap-Assisted Colonoscopy Versus Conventional Colonoscopy: A Preliminary Result

The effect of nurse assisted colonoscopy on adenoma detection rates: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

The impact of EndoCuff-assisted colonoscopy on the polyp detection rate: A cross-over randomized back-to-back study

Standard-definition White-light, High-definition White-light Versus Narrow-band Imaging Endoscopy for Detecting Colorectal Adenomas: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.

Endocuff-assisted vs. standard colonoscopy in the fecal occult blood test-based UK Bowel Cancer Screening Programme (E-cap study): a randomized trial

Effectiveness of artificial intelligence assisted colonoscopy on adenoma and polyp miss rate: A meta-analysis of tandem RCTs