Abstract:Online malware scanners are one of the best weapons in the arsenal of cybersecurity companies and researchers. A fundamental part of such systems is the sandbox that provides an instrumented and isolated environment (virtualized or emulated) for any user to upload and run unknown artifacts and identify potentially malicious behaviors. The provided API and the wealth of information inthe reports produced by these services have also helped attackers test the efficacy of numerous techniques to make malware hard to <a class="link-external link-http" href="http://detect.The" rel="external noopener nofollow">this http URL</a> most common technique used by malware for evading the analysis system is to monitor the execution environment, detect the presence of any debugging artifacts, and hide its malicious behavior if needed. This is usually achieved by looking for signals suggesting that the execution environment does not belong to a the native machine, such as specific memory patterns or behavioral traits of certain CPU instructions. In this paper, we show how an attacker can evade detection on such online services by incorporating a Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm into a malware sample. Specifically, we leverage the asymptotic behavior of the computational cost of PoW algorithms when they run on some classes of hardware platforms to effectively detect a non bare-metal environment of the malware sandbox analyzer. To prove the validity of this intuition, we design and implement the POW-HOW framework, a tool to automatically implement sandbox detection strategies and embed a test evasion program into an arbitrary malware sample. Our empirical evaluation shows that the proposed evasion technique is durable, hard to fingerprint, and reduces existing malware detection rate by a factor of 10. Moreover, we show how bare-metal environments cannot scale with actual malware submissions rates for consumer services.

Wapplique: Testing WebAssembly Runtime Via Execution Context-aware Bytecode Mutation

WASMaker: Differential Testing of WebAssembly Runtimes Via Semantic-aware Binary Generation

WRTester: Differential Testing of WebAssembly Runtimes via Semantic-aware Binary Generation

MorFuzz: Fuzzing Processor Via Runtime Instruction Morphing Enhanced Synchronizable Co-simulation.

Wasm-Mutate: Fast and effective binary diversification for WebAssembly

WADIFF: A Differential Testing Framework for WebAssembly Runtimes

AutoPwn: Artifact-Assisted Heap Exploit Generation for CTF PWN Competitions

Characterizing and Detecting WebAssembly Runtime Bugs

Revealing Performance Issues in Server-side WebAssembly Runtimes via Differential Testing

Flexible Non-intrusive Dynamic Instrumentation for WebAssembly

Wasmati: An Efficient Static Vulnerability Scanner for WebAssembly

ESFuzzer: An Efficient Way to Fuzz WebAssembly Interpreter

Fuzzm: Finding Memory Bugs through Binary-Only Instrumentation and Fuzzing of WebAssembly

Owi: Performant Parallel Symbolic Execution Made Easy, an Application to WebAssembly

SeeWasm: An Efficient and Fully-Functional Symbolic Execution Engine for WebAssembly Binaries

WEFix: Intelligent Automatic Generation of Explicit Waits for Efficient Web End-to-End Flaky Tests

eWAPA: An eBPF-based WASI Performance Analysis Framework for WebAssembly Runtimes

POW-HOW: An enduring timing side-channel to evade online malware sandboxes

Research on WebAssembly Runtimes: A Survey

A Comprehensive Trusted Runtime for WebAssembly with Intel SGX

WASMixer: Binary Obfuscation for WebAssembly