A Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial of Vascular Risk Factor Management in General Practice

Mark Harris,Mahnaz Fanaian,Upali W Jayasinghe,Megan Passey,S. McKenzie,Gawaine Powell Davies,David Lyle,Rachel Laws,Heike Schütze,Qing Wan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5694/mja12.10313
2012-01-01
Abstract:General practices were eligible to participate in the study if they used computer-based medical records and were not involved in other vascular res e arc h.T hi rt y -s ix p ra ct i c es expressed interest, but only 30 were recruited -including four solo GPs, five practices with more than four general practitioner and 18 practices with one or more practice nurses.Sixteen practices were randomly allocated to the study intervention group and 14 to the study control group.Patients were eligible to participate in the study if they had attended the practice in the previous 12 months and were either aged 40-55 years with a recorded diagnosis of A cluster randomised controlled trial of vascular risk factor management in general practice I ResearchObjective: To evaluate the impact of a lifestyle intervention in Australian general practice to reduce the risk of vascular disease.Design, setting and participants: Stratified cluster randomised controlled trial among 30 general practices in New South Wales from July 2008 to January 2010.Patients aged 40-64 years were invited to participate.The subgroup who were 40-55 years of age were included only if they had either hypertension or dyslipidaemia.Intervention: A general practice-based health-check with brief lifestyle counselling and referral of high-risk patients to a program consisting of one to two individual visits with an exercise physiologist or dietitian, and six group sessions.Main outcome measures: Outcomes at baseline, 6 and 12 months included the behavioural and physiological risk factors for vascular disease -self-reported diet and physical activity, and measured weight, body mass index, waist circumference, blood lipid and blood sugar levels, and blood pressure.Results: Of the 3128 patients who were invited, 958 patients (30.6%) responded and 814 were eligible to participate.Of these, 699 commenced the study, and 655 remained in the study at 12 months.Physical activity levels increased to a greater extent in the intervention group than the control group at 6 and 12 months (P = 0.005).There were no other changes in behavioural or physiological outcomes or in estimated absolute risk of cardiovascular disease at 12 months.Of the 384 enrolled in the intervention group, 117 patients (30.5%) attended the minimum number of group program sessions and lost more weight (mean weight loss, 1.06 kg) than those who did not attend the minimum number of sessions (mean weight gain, 0.73 kg). Conclusion:While patients who received counselling by their general practitioner increased self-reported physical activity, only those who attended the group sessions sustained an improvement in weight.However, more research is needed to determine whether group programs offer significant benefits over individual counselling in general practice.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?