Selection of Constitutive Models for the Braced Excavation under Rainfall-Infiltration in Unsaturated Soils

Xiao-Qian Zhang,Yan Cheng,Ming-Guang Li,Jin-Jian Chen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-9203-4_6
2024-01-01
Abstract:A great challenge in the construction of braced excavation in unsaturated residual soil is the emergency caused by rainfall-infiltration, which may affect the safety of the braced excavation and the serviceability of adjacent underground structures. Therefore, prediction of the deformation of braced excavation induced by rainfall-infiltration is becoming one of the major tasks in the design of underground engineering. Numerical simulation is gaining popularity, and many constitutive models are available nowadays to analyze excavation problems. However, it is not clear to select a suitable soil constitutive model to describe responses of the braced excavation under rainfall-infiltration in unsaturated soil. This paper investigated the optimal selection of different soil constitutive models. These models included the hardening soil model (the HS model), the Mohr-Coulomb model (the MC model), and the Tresca model. A series of laboratory tests back-analysis using the above three soil constitutive models were conducted to evaluate the ability to predict the mechanical response of soils. And a case of braced excavation in unsaturated soil was simulated by using the different constitutive models. The optional selection of constitutive models was discussed by comparing simulation results of wall deflection, earth pressure, and stress path of soils. These investigations confirmed that the HS model had the best predictions of soil stress state and excavation deformation. This result may be since the HS model could more reasonably predict the pore water pressure and critical failure state of soils under rainfall and excavation conditions.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?