Underwater Maneuvering Target Motion Analysis Using Delayed Azimuth Angles

Yan Wang,Xinyu Zhang,Jinjin Wang,Boyu Zhang,Jing Li,Sibo Sun
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2024.118901
IF: 5
2024-01-01
Ocean Engineering
Abstract:Accurate position information of an underwater target is the premise of successfully executing underwater missions, and this paper focuses on underwater target motion analysis (TMA) using delayed azimuth angles. Considering that the underwater sound speed (around 1500 m/s) is much smaller than the speed of light (3 x 108 m/s), the underwater TMA needs to adopt the non-stop model considering the effect of the target movement during signal propagation on state estimation, instead of the traditional go-stop model ignoring the target movement during signal propagation. The existing non-stop model is based on a constant-velocity target, and the model mismatch will make the estimated results biased when it is applied to a maneuvering target. In this paper, we focus on the constant-acceleration (CA) target and propose two methods to solve this problem. One is to extend the non-stop model to the case of a constant-acceleration target. We build the corresponding least squares (LS) estimator and derive the expression of the root mean square error (RMSE) of the LS solution. The other is to directly offset the estimation bias of the CA go-stop model and a bias-compensated algorithm is proposed to improve the performance. Simulations prove that the proposed methods can result in a smaller RMSE than the traditional CA go-stop model. Their RMSEs decrease with the number of measurements and observers and increase with random angle errors. When the number of measurements is small, the RMSE of the established CA non-stop model is smaller than that of the bias-compensated algorithm. As the number of measurements increases, their estimation precisions become gradually equal. The running time of the proposed methods increases with the number of measurements and observers. When the number of observers is small, the bias-compensated algorithm has the advantage of needing less running time. In addition, the running time of the bias-compensated algorithm does not approximately change with the random angle errors, while that of the CA non-stop model increases with the random angle errors.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?