Abstract:Background: The current study examined people’s propensity to mind wander when they perform vigilance tasks that tap different components of vigilance, namely arousal or executive. We suggest that the propensity to mind-wander may occur not only spontaneously (unintentional), but also deliberately (intentional) and that this distinction may have considerable theoretical implications. Thus, while intentional mind-wandering could arise from a lack of motivation and monotonicity of the task, unintentional mind-wandering could be driven mainly by a failure of executive control. Methods: Participants performed the Psychomotor Vigilance Task (PVT) to assess the arousal component of vigilance, and the Sustained Attention to Response task (SART) to assess the executive component of vigilance. Two types of mind wandering were probed throughout the task execution, intentional and unintentional. Results: The rates of overall mind-wandering were greater for the PVT than for the SART. Although there was greater propensity to develop unintentional than intentional mind-wandering in both tasks, propensity to intentional mind-wandering was higher with the PVT than with the SART, whereas the ratio of unintentional mind-wandering was higher with the SART than with the PVT. Finally, regarding unintentional mind wandering, in the PVT, the most pronounced increment occurred between blocks 1 and 2, and thereafter it stabilized. In the SART, a rather progressive increment was observed as the task progressed. Regarding intentional mind wandering, progressive increment was observed mainly in the SART.Conclusions: The differential patterns of intentional and unintentional mind wandering as a function of task suggest that, intentional mind wandering occurs mainly in monotonous tasks where propensity to mind wander has little impact on task performance. However, unintentional mind wandering is the result of a failure to keep control on the primary executive task and therefore attentional resources deviate to mind wander, the default mode. These results support and extend the Thompson et al.’s (2015) resource-control model.

The Effects of Posture on Mind Wandering How Executive Control Changes

The Effects of Posture on Mind Wandering

Different efficiencies of attentional orienting in different wandering minds

Research on Mind Wandering:Theories, Methods and Advances

Effects of task type on spontaneous alternations of attentional states

Mind wandering is associated with worsening attentional vigilance

Propensity to intentional and unintentional mind-wandering differs in arousal and executive vigilance tasks

The Influence of Posture on Attention

The effects of one-session mindfulness meditation on mind wandering

The Role of Focus Back Effort in the Relationships among Motivation, Interest, and Mind Wandering: an Individual Difference Perspective

Propensity to intentional and unintentional mind-wandering differ in arousal and executive vigilance tasks

Self-reported mind wandering reflects executive control and selective attention

A Neuropsychology Review of Cognition and Postural Control

Prior EEG marks focused and mind-wandering mental states across trials

Insights into the time course of mind wandering during task execution

Detecting Mind Wandering: An Objective Method via Simultaneous Control of Respiration and Fingertip Pressure.

The contribution of latent factors of executive functioning to mind wandering: an experience sampling study

Catching wandering minds with tapping fingers: neural and behavioral insights into task-unrelated cognition

Interaction between visual working memory and upright postural control in young adults: an event-related potential study based on the n-back paradigm

Is better selective attention while standing possible without cost on postural sway?