Early Season Depletion of Dissolved Iron in the Ross Sea Polynya: Implications for Iron Dynamics on the Antarctic Continental Shelf
Peter N. Sedwick,Chris M. Marsay,Bettina Sohst,Ana Aguilar‐Islas,Maeve C. Lohan,Matthew C. Long,Kevin R. Arrigo,Robert B. Dunbar,Mak A. Saito,Walker O Smith,Giacomo R. DiTullio
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1029/2010jc006553
2011-01-01
Journal of Geophysical Research
Abstract:Journal of Geophysical Research: OceansVolume 116, Issue C12 Free Access Early season depletion of dissolved iron in the Ross Sea polynya: Implications for iron dynamics on the Antarctic continental shelf P. N. Sedwick, P. N. Sedwick [email protected] Deparment of Ocean, Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, Virginia, USASearch for more papers by this authorC. M. Marsay, C. M. Marsay School of Ocean and Earth Science, University of Southampton, Southampton, UKSearch for more papers by this authorB. M. Sohst, B. M. Sohst Deparment of Ocean, Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, Virginia, USASearch for more papers by this authorA. M. Aguilar-Islas, A. M. Aguilar-Islas School of Fisheries and Ocean Sciences, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, Alaska, USASearch for more papers by this authorM. C. Lohan, M. C. Lohan School of Earth, Ocean and Environmental Sciences, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UKSearch for more papers by this authorM. C. Long, M. C. Long Department of Environmental Earth System Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA Now at the National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado, USASearch for more papers by this authorK. R. Arrigo, K. R. Arrigo Department of Environmental Earth System Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USASearch for more papers by this authorR. B. Dunbar, R. B. Dunbar Department of Environmental Earth System Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USASearch for more papers by this authorM. A. Saito, M. A. Saito Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, Massachusetts, USASearch for more papers by this authorW. O. Smith, W. O. Smith Virginia Institute of Marine Science, College of William and Mary, Gloucester Point, Virginia, USASearch for more papers by this authorG. R. DiTullio, G. R. DiTullio Grice Marine Laboratory, College of Charleston, Charleston, South Carolina, USASearch for more papers by this author P. N. Sedwick, P. N. Sedwick [email protected] Deparment of Ocean, Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, Virginia, USASearch for more papers by this authorC. M. Marsay, C. M. Marsay School of Ocean and Earth Science, University of Southampton, Southampton, UKSearch for more papers by this authorB. M. Sohst, B. M. Sohst Deparment of Ocean, Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, Virginia, USASearch for more papers by this authorA. M. Aguilar-Islas, A. M. Aguilar-Islas School of Fisheries and Ocean Sciences, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, Alaska, USASearch for more papers by this authorM. C. Lohan, M. C. Lohan School of Earth, Ocean and Environmental Sciences, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UKSearch for more papers by this authorM. C. Long, M. C. Long Department of Environmental Earth System Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA Now at the National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado, USASearch for more papers by this authorK. R. Arrigo, K. R. Arrigo Department of Environmental Earth System Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USASearch for more papers by this authorR. B. Dunbar, R. B. Dunbar Department of Environmental Earth System Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USASearch for more papers by this authorM. A. Saito, M. A. Saito Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, Massachusetts, USASearch for more papers by this authorW. O. Smith, W. O. Smith Virginia Institute of Marine Science, College of William and Mary, Gloucester Point, Virginia, USASearch for more papers by this authorG. R. DiTullio, G. R. DiTullio Grice Marine Laboratory, College of Charleston, Charleston, South Carolina, USASearch for more papers by this author First published: 15 December 2011 https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JC006553Citations: 89AboutSectionsPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Abstract [1] The Ross Sea polynya is among the most productive regions in the Southern Ocean and may constitute a significant oceanic CO2 sink. Based on results from several field studies, this region has been considered seasonally iron limited, whereby a “winter reserve” of dissolved iron (dFe) is progressively depleted during the growing season to low concentrations (∼0.1 nM) that limit phytoplankton growth in the austral summer (December–February). Here we report new iron data for the Ross Sea polynya during austral summer 2005–2006 (27 December–22 January) and the following austral spring 2006 (16 November–3 December). The summer 2005–2006 data show generally low dFe concentrations in polynya surface waters (0.10 ± 0.05 nM in upper 40 m, n = 175), consistent with previous observations. Surprisingly, our spring 2006 data reveal similar low surface dFe concentrations in the polynya (0.06 ± 0.04 nM in upper 40 m, n = 69), in association with relatively high rates of primary production (∼170–260 mmol C m−2 d−1). These results indicate that the winter reserve dFe may be consumed relatively early in the growing season, such that polynya surface waters can become “iron limited” as early as November; i.e., the seasonal depletion of dFe is not necessarily gradual. Satellite observations reveal significant biomass accumulation in the polynya during summer 2006–2007, implying significant sources of “new” dFe to surface waters during this period. Possible sources of this new dFe include episodic vertical exchange, lateral advection, aerosol input, and reductive dissolution of particulate iron. Key Points Dissolved iron can be depleted to low levels (~0.1 nM) in the Ross Sea in spring Despite dissolved iron depletion, algal production continues during summer Sources of “new” dissolved iron are required to fuel summer production in the Ross Sea 1. Introduction [2] Primary production that occurs in waters upwelled south of the Antarctic Polar Front is thought to play a critical role in regulating the air-sea flux of carbon dioxide. In essence, the magnitude of the Southern Ocean CO2 sink depends on the biological drawdown of nutrients from these waters prior to the formation and subduction of deep waters around the Antarctic continent [Marinov et al., 2006]. In this context, the Antarctic continental margin is of critical importance, being the most productive region in the Southern Ocean [Arrigo et al., 2008a; Smith and Comiso, 2008] and a primary area of oceanic deep water formation [Orsi et al., 2002; Orsi and Wiederwohl, 2009]. The Ross Sea continental shelf is among the most productive areas on the Antarctic margin [Arrigo et al., 2008a; Smith and Comiso, 2008] and likely represents an important but unquantified oceanic CO2 sink. Indeed, a modeling study by Arrigo et al. [2008b] suggests that the net air-sea CO2 flux on the Ross Sea Shelf may account for as much as 27% of a recent estimate of the total Southern Ocean CO2 sink, which does not include the Antarctic continental margin [Takahashi et al., 2009]. An essential component of the Ross Sea CO2 sink is provided by the regional phytoplankton production, which draws down pCO2 in surface waters and drives the export of organic carbon to depth. [3] The factors that control primary production in the Ross Sea are not completely understood, but are almost certain to include the availability of dissolved iron (dFe), at least during the latter part of the growing season [Martin et al., 1991; Sedwick et al., 2000; Boyd, 2002; Coale et al., 2005]. In the highly productive polynya region of the southern Ross Sea, shipboard bioassay experiments have demonstrated that low dFe concentrations can limit phytoplankton growth rates during the austral summer [Martin et al., 1990; Sedwick and DiTullio, 1997; Sedwick et al., 2000, Coale et al., 2003; Bertrand et al., 2007]. When considered together, the limited iron data from the southern Ross Sea suggest that near-surface dFe concentrations decrease from ∼0.2–1 nM in austral spring (September–November) to ∼0.1–0.2 nM in austral summer (December–February) [Fitzwater et al., 2000; Sedwick et al., 2000; Coale et al., 2005]. Over this same period, the surface concentrations of nitrate and silicic acid typically decrease from ∼30 to ∼15 μM and from ∼80 to ∼60 μM, respectively [Smith et al., 2003]. [4] Based on these observations, it has been argued that the southern Ross Sea exhibits “seasonal iron limitation,” whereby vertical resupply from convective mixing and surface inputs from melting sea ice result in relatively high dFe concentrations in surface waters during the spring, followed by a progressive decrease in dFe concentrations during the course of the growing season, because of the combined effects of phytoplankton uptake, particle export, and scavenging [Sedwick et al., 2000; Coale et al., 2005]. With these assumptions, numerical modeling has simulated the seasonal drawdown in dissolved iron and macronutrients, and the associated onset of “iron limitation” of phytoplankton growth rates and biomass, with model solutions indicating that the total supply of dissolved iron to waters in the euphotic zone sets an upper limit on the magnitude of annual primary production on the Ross Sea shelf [Arrigo et al., 2003; Tagliabue and Arrigo, 2005]. [5] In this paper we report new measurements that reveal surprisingly low dFe concentrations (∼0.1 nM) in the euphotic zone of the Ross Sea polynya in late spring (November), thus challenging the conceptual model of gradual dFe depletion during the growing season and raising questions concerning the source of “new” dissolved iron that sustains phytoplankton production over the ensuing summer months. As discussed by Boyd and Ellwood [2010], iron exhibits both “nutrient-type” and “scavenged-type” behavior in the oceanic water column. In remote regions of the open ocean, such as the Antarctic Circumpolar Current, this hybrid behavior results in chronic iron deficiency whereby upwelled subsurface waters contain an excess of macronutrients over dissolved iron, relative to the nutritional requirements of phytoplankton. A critical difference between iron and macronutrients is the clear importance of aeolian and benthic sources of iron to the surface ocean [Moore and Braucher, 2008; Boyd and Ellwood, 2010]. In the Ross Sea, benthic inputs are likely to be particularly important, both in terms of the vertical resupply of iron during winter mixing and in the potential for episodic vertical and lateral inputs of iron to surface waters of the polynya during summer. Bearing this in mind, we examine our new data with particular attention to potential sources of dissolved iron to both surface and subsurface waters of the southern Ross Sea. 2. Methods [6] The data presented in this paper pertain to samples collected during two cruises aboard the research vessel ice breaker (RVIB) Nathaniel B. Palmer, as part of the Controls on Ross Sea Algal Community Structure (CORSACS) program. Water samples discussed here were collected in the austral summer of 2005–2006 (27 December 2005–22 January 2006, during cruise NBP06–01) and during the following austral spring of 2006 (8 November 2006–3 December 2006, during cruise NBP06–08). Figures 1a and 1b show the cruise tracks and trace-metal water column sampling stations (except station NX12, which was located north of the Ross Sea) overlain on satellite-derived estimates of ice-free time during each cruise, which were obtained using the method of Markus and Burns [1995]. Figure 1Open in figure viewerPowerPoint Cruise tracks and locations of trace-metal water column sampling stations during the CORSACS program, overlain on satellite-derived estimates of percentages of ice-free time during each cruise for (a) summer 2005–2006 and (b) spring 2006 (not shown is station NX12, located north of map area). The red line indicates the 1000 m isobath. [7] Hydrographic data and samples for ancillary chemical and biological measurements (salinity, dissolved oxygen, macronutrients, phytoplankton pigments, primary productivity) were collected using a rosette sampler fitted with 24 10 L Niskin bottles (General Oceanics), an SBE 911 plus conductivity, temperature, and depth (CTD) sensor (SeaBird Electronics), an SBE 43 dissolved oxygen sensor, and a WETStar flow-through profiling fluorometer (WET Labs). The dissolved oxygen sensor was calibrated based on discrete dissolved oxygen measurements, as described by Long et al. [2011a]. The profiling fluorometer was not calibrated at sea; thus the raw signal output provides only a qualitative measure of water column chlorophyll levels. Further details and data for these ancillary measurements are provided by Long et al. [2011a] and archived at the U.S. Biological and Chemical Oceanography Data Management Office (see section 3). [8] Seawater samples for the analysis of trace metals were collected using two methods: (1) Near-surface seawater samples were collected from ∼3 m depth while underway at a speed of ∼5 knots, using a towed, trace-metal-clean pumping system [Bruland et al., 2005]; and (2) water column samples were collected in custom-modified 5 L Teflon-lined, external-closure Niskin-X samplers (General Oceanics) or in 10 L Teflon-lined GO-FLO samplers (General Oceanics; >300 m depth samples only), all of which were deployed on a nonmetal line [Sedwick et al., 2005; Saito et al., 2010]. Figures 2a and 2b show the location of the near-surface underway samples and the water column trace-metal sampling stations, overlain on ETOPO1 bathymetry [Amante and Eakins, 2008]. The extensive sea ice cover during the spring 2006 cruise restricted the underway and water column sampling to a much smaller area of the Ross Sea than that sampled during the summer 2005–2006 cruise. Figure 2Open in figure viewerPowerPoint Maps of study area showing dissolved iron (dFe) concentrations of near-surface underway seawater samples from (a) summer 2005–2006 and (b) spring 2006, along with the locations of trace-metal water column sampling stations (NX12 not shown) and ETOPO1 seafloor bathymetry. [9] All seawater samples were filtered within 4 h of collection using 0.2 μm pore Supor Acropak filter capsules (Pall Corp.), except for the GO-FLO samples, which were filtered through 0.4 μm pore, 144 mm diameter polycarbonate filter membranes (GE Osmonics). All filtered seawater samples were acidified to pH 1.7 with Seastar Baseline ultrapure hydrochloric acid and then stored for at least 24 h prior to the analysis of dissolved iron. Dissolved iron (dFe) was determined by flow injection analysis with colorimetric detection after an in-line preconcentration on resin-immobilized 8-hydroxyquinoline [Sedwick et al., 2005, 2008], using a method modified from Measures et al. [1995]. The efficacy of our sample collection, processing, and analytical methods for dFe have been verified through participation in the Sampling and Analysis of Iron (SAFe) intercomparison exercise for the sampling and analysis of iron in seawater [Johnson et al., 2007]. For the SAFe seawater reference materials, we determined mean dFe concentrations of 0.11 ± 0.01 nM (for surface seawater S1, n = 15) and 0.97 ± 0.06 nM (for deep seawater D2, n = 14), compared with the SAFe community consensus values of 0.097 ± 0.043 nM (for seawater S1) 0.91 ± 0.17 nM (for seawater D2). [10] In addition, unfiltered aliquots of the water column samples were acidified to pH 1.7 with Seastar Baseline ultrapure hydrochloric acid and then stored for at least 6 months, prior to determination of “total-dissolvable iron” (TDFe) by flow injection analysis using the same method as for dFe. TDFe is equal to the concentration of dFe plus acid-labile particulate iron (ALPFe). The latter is assumed to include most of the particulate iron in seawater, with the exception of lattice-bound iron in refractory aluminosilicate particles, which likely does not participate in the marine iron cycle over seasonal to annual time scales. Thus ALPFe (=TDFe – dFe) provides a conservative estimate of particulate iron in the water column. Dissolved inorganic nitrate plus nitrite (N + N), phosphate (DIP), and silicic acid (Si) were determined in filtered seawater samples with a shipboard Lachat Quickchem FIA+ series 8000 autoanalyzer following a method modified from standard World Ocean Circulation Experiment (WOCE) protocols [Gordon et al., 1993]. 3. Results [11] Iron data from the two CORSACS cruises are presented in Figures 2–5. Figures 2a and 2b show dFe concentrations in near-surface underway samples from the summer 2005–2006 and spring 2006 cruises, respectively. Figures 3 and 4 show water column dFe concentration profiles from the summer 2005–2006 and spring 2006 cruises, respectively. Figure 5 presents quasi-zonal sections of dFe, dissolved nitrate plus nitrite (N + N), and total-dissolvable iron (TDFe) that were constructed by interpolating between vertical profiles from sampling stations located within the latitudinal band of 76°S–77°S. The corresponding hydrographic data (temperature, salinity, dissolved oxygen) from CTD stations along this quasi-zonal section are presented in Figure 6. The zonal plots shown in Figures 5 and 6 were prepared using the Ocean Data View graphical analysis and display package [Schlitzer, 2002], with interpolation performed using horizontal scale settings of 30 (for Figure 5) and 70 (for Figure 6), and a vertical scale setting of 70. A lower horizontal scale setting was chosen for Figure 5 in order to limit the extent of lateral interpolation, given that the trace-metal sampling stations were widely spaced relative to the CTD stations that provided the data shown in Figure 6. Figure 3Open in figure viewerPowerPoint Vertical profiles of dissolved iron (dFe) concentrations and in situ chlorophyll fluorescence (uncalibrated fluorometer signal) at trace-metal sampling stations from the summer 2005–2006 cruise. Figure 4Open in figure viewerPowerPoint Vertical profiles of dissolved iron (dFe) concentrations and in situ chlorophyll fluorescence (uncalibrated fluorometer signal) at trace-metal sampling stations from the spring 2006 cruise. Figure 5Open in figure viewerPowerPoint (a, b) Locations of water column sampling stations used to construct quasi-zonal sections of dissolved iron (dFe) in (c) summer 2005–2006 and (d) spring 2006, nitrate plus nitrite (N + N) in (e) summer 2005–2006 and (f) spring 2006, and total-dissolvable iron (TDFe) in (g) summer 2005–2006 and (h) spring 2006. Gray triangles indicate approximate depth of seafloor; red frames in Figures 5c, 5g, and 5e indicate the lateral extent of the spring 2006 zonal section. Figure 6Open in figure viewerPowerPoint (a, b) Locations of water column sampling stations used to construct quasi-zonal sections of temperature (T) in (c) summer 2005–2006 and (d) spring 2006, salinity (S) in (e) summer 2005–2006 and (f) spring 2006, and dissolved oxygen (O2, from CTD sensor) in (g) summer 2005–2006 and (h) spring 2006. Bathymetry shown (gray) is interpolated between bottom depths for CTD stations; the red frames shown in Figures 6c, 6g, and 6e indicate the lateral extent of the spring 2006 zonal section. [12] Table 1 presents the sampling dates, station locations, estimated mixed-layer depths, and iron (dFe, TDFe, calculated ALPFe) and macronutrient (N + N, DIP, Si) data for the trace-metal water column sampling stations. In addition, these and ancillary data discussed in this paper (hydrography, nutrients, iron, pigments) are archived at and freely available from the U.S. Biological and Chemical Oceanography Data Management Office (see http://osprey.bcodmo.org/project.cfm under project acronym CORSACS). The water masses discussed in this paper follow the classification scheme of Orsi and Wiederwohl [2009], who describe six distinct water masses over the Ross Sea continental shelf: the low-salinity Antarctic Surface Water (AASW); the relatively warm, oxygen-poor Modified Circumpolar Deep Water (MCDW); the relatively cold Shelf Water (SW), which includes both Low-Salinity Shelf Water (LSSW) and High-Salinity Shelf Water (HSSW); the transitional Modified Shelf Water (MSW); and the very cold Ice Shelf Water (ISW). Table 1. Data From Trace-Metal Water Column Sampling Stationsa Station Name Sampling Date Latitude (°S) Longitude (°E) MLDb (m) Depth (m) dFe (nM) TDFe (nM) ALPFec (nM) N + N (μM) DIP (μM) Si (μM) CORSACS-1 NX1 29 Dec 2005 77.67 179.94 ND 6 0.34 1.03 0.69 16.7 1.4 79.8 CORSACS-1 NX1 29 Dec 2005 77.67 179.94 ND 16 0.12 0.73 0.61 18.4 1.7 83.1 CORSACS-1 NX1 29 Dec 2005 77.67 179.94 ND 36 0.07 0.73 0.66 20.1 1.6 71.6 CORSACS-1 NX1 29 Dec 2005 77.67 179.94 ND 56 0.11 1.07 0.96 14.1 1.7 50.0 CORSACS-1 NX1 29 Dec 2005 77.67 179.94 ND 76 0.30 2.01 1.71 22.9 2.0 80.0 CORSACS-1 NX1 29 Dec 2005 77.67 179.94 ND 96 0.21 2.81 2.60 26.5 2.2 82.1 CORSACS-1 NX1 29 Dec 2005 77.67 179.94 ND 296 0.18 3.62 3.44 24.3 2.0 70.0 CORSACS-1 NX2 30 Dec 2005 76.82 170.76 56 6 0.17 1.75 1.59 15.2 1.4 79.4 CORSACS-1 NX2 30 Dec 2005 76.82 170.76 56 16 0.09 1.85 1.76 16.4 1.4 79.6 CORSACS-1 NX2 30 Dec 2005 76.82 170.76 56 36 0.16 2.19 2.03 19.3 1.6 79.7 CORSACS-1 NX2 30 Dec 2005 76.82 170.76 56 56 0.17 2.27 2.10 17.2 1.6 69.1 CORSACS-1 NX2 30 Dec 2005 76.82 170.76 56 76 0.27 3.32 3.05 24.0 1.9 81.4 CORSACS-1 NX2 30 Dec 2005 76.82 170.76 56 96 0.21 3.47 3.26 25.3 1.9 81.5 CORSACS-1 NX2 30 Dec 2005 76.82 170.76 56 146 0.22 4.00 3.78 27.4 2.0 81.6 CORSACS-1 NX2 30 Dec 2005 76.82 170.76 56 196 0.36 3.86 3.50 30.3 2.2 81.8 CORSACS-1 NX2 30 Dec 2005 76.82 170.76 56 296 0.28 2.85 2.58 29.9 2.1 78.2 CORSACS-1 NX3 1 Jan 2006 76.49 166.33 6 6 0.31 0.91 0.60 20.0 1.5 68.9 CORSACS-1 NX3 1 Jan 2006 76.49 166.33 6 16 0.13 0.78 0.66 25.0 2.0 74.1 CORSACS-1 NX3 1 Jan 2006 76.49 166.33 6 36 0.17 1.33 1.16 30.1 2.3 78.1 CORSACS-1 NX3 1 Jan 2006 76.49 166.33 6 56 0.22 1.55 1.33 31.4 2.2 78.7 CORSACS-1 NX3 1 Jan 2006 76.49 166.33 6 76 0.38 2.21 1.83 31.0 2.2 78.9 CORSACS-1 NX3 1 Jan 2006 76.49 166.33 6 96 0.32 1.81 1.50 31.0 2.3 79.6 CORSACS-1 NX3 1 Jan 2006 76.49 166.33 6 146 0.45 1.91 1.46 31.6 2.3 79.7 CORSACS-1 NX3 1 Jan 2006 76.49 166.33 6 196 0.53 2.36 1.83 32.2 2.3 80.6 CORSACS-1 NX3 1 Jan 2006 76.49 166.33 6 296 0.51 3.62 3.11 32.1 2.3 81.6 CORSACS-1 NX4 3 Jan 2006 76.50 179.17 60 6 0.12 0.85 0.73 17.8 1.4 74.9 CORSACS-1 NX4 3 Jan 2006 76.50 179.17 60 16 0.06 0.76 0.70 18.8 1.4 79.7 CORSACS-1 NX4 3 Jan 2006 76.50 179.17 60 36 0.08 0.67 0.59 17.5 1.4 74.5 CORSACS-1 NX4 3 Jan 2006 76.50 179.17 60 56 0.06 0.78 0.72 17.6 1.4 74.1 CORSACS-1 NX4 3 Jan 2006 76.50 179.17 60 76 0.08 0.87 0.79 17.6 1.4 74.0 CORSACS-1 NX4 3 Jan 2006 76.50 179.17 60 96 0.14 1.35 1.21 24.4 1.9 77.4 CORSACS-1 NX4 3 Jan 2006 76.50 179.17 60 146 0.22 2.80 2.58 29.2 2.2 79.5 CORSACS-1 NX4 3 Jan 2006 76.50 179.17 60 196 0.31 11.10 10.79 30.9 2.2 80.2 CORSACS-1 NX4 3 Jan 2006 76.50 179.17 60 231 0.31 24.26 23.95 31.2 2.2 81.2 CORSACS-1 NX5 5 Jan 2006 76.50 −170.00 54 6 0.17 0.43 0.26 21.2 1.5 81.0 CORSACS-1 NX5 5 Jan 2006 76.50 −170.00 54 16 0.14 0.40 0.27 22.5 1.6 82.2 CORSACS-1 NX5 5 Jan 2006 76.50 −170.00 54 36 0.12 0.47 0.36 24.1 1.8 81.9 CORSACS-1 NX5 5 Jan 2006 76.50 −170.00 54 56 0.13 0.49 0.36 26.3 2.0 82.8 CORSACS-1 NX5 5 Jan 2006 76.50 −170.00 54 76 0.15 0.94 0.78 28.2 2.0 84.5 CORSACS-1 NX5 5 Jan 2006 76.50 −170.00 54 96 0.13 0.79 0.66 28.8 2.1 83.8 CORSACS-1 NX5 5 Jan 2006 76.50 −170.00 54 146 0.18 1.70 1.52 30.0 2.2 85.8 CORSACS-1 NX5 5 Jan 2006 76.50 −170.00 54 196 0.29 2.81 2.53 30.7 2.2 87.4 CORSACS-1 NX5 5 Jan 2006 76.50 −170.00 54 296 0.30 4.90 4.59 30.7 2.2 87.3 CORSACS-1 NX6 7 Jan 2006 76.00 −176.62 31 6 0.22 0.28 0.06 20.6 1.4 71.2 CORSACS-1 NX6 7 Jan 2006 76.00 −176.62 31 16 0.10 0.31 0.21 20.5 1.5 71.1 CORSACS-1 NX6 7 Jan 2006 76.00 −176.62 31 36 0.11 0.64 0.54 27.7 2.0 82.3 CORSACS-1 NX6 7 Jan 2006 76.00 −176.62 31 56 0.13 0.96 0.83 28.8 2.0 82.5 CORSACS-1 NX6 7 Jan 2006 76.00 −176.62 31 76 0.15 1.30 1.16 28.1 2.1 82.9 CORSACS-1 NX6 7 Jan 2006 76.00 −176.62 31 96 0.24 6.41 6.16 31.4 2.3 90.0 CORSACS-1 NX6 7 Jan 2006 76.00 −176.62 31 146 0.16 2.83 2.68 30.1 2.2 89.5 CORSACS-1 NX6 7 Jan 2006 76.00 −176.62 31 196 0.15 1.71 1.57 29.4 2.1 91.3 CORSACS-1 NX6 7 Jan 2006 76.00 −176.62 31 296 0.20 3.33 3.13 31.2 2.2 84.7 CORSACS-1 NX7 9 Jan 2006 76.00 170.98 46 6 0.22 0.37 0.15 18.0 1.1 58.4 CORSACS-1 NX7 9 Jan 2006 76.00 170.98 46 16 0.07 0.41 0.34 18.0 1.1 58.7 CORSACS-1 NX7 9 Jan 2006 76.00 170.98 46 36 0.07 0.36 0.30 17.9 1.2 58.7 CORSACS-1 NX7 9 Jan 2006 76.00 170.98 46 56 0.08 0.49 0.42 17.6 1.2 62.8 CORSACS-1 NX7 9 Jan 2006 76.00 170.98 46 76 0.12 0.81 0.69 26.9 2.1 77.6 CORSACS-1 NX7 9 Jan 2006 76.00 170.98 46 96 0.09 1.45 1.37 27.6 2.1 80.3 CORSACS-1 NX7 9 Jan 2006 76.00 170.98 46 146 0.14 3.10 2.96 30.8 2.2 87.5 CORSACS-1 NX7 9 Jan 2006 76.00 170.98 46 196 0.15 2.90 2.76 30.9 2.3 81.9 CORSACS-1 NX7 9 Jan 2006 76.00 170.98 46 296 0.20 7.45 7.25 31.1 2.3 81.8 CORSACS-1 NX8 12 Jan 2006 77.50 −175.75 31 6 0.17 0.62 0.45 18.2 1.3 68.0 CORSACS-1 NX8 12 Jan 2006 77.50 −175.75 31 16 0.09 0.25 0.17 16.5 1.4 68.5 CORSACS-1 NX8 12 Jan 2006 77.50 −175.75 31 36 0.07 0.29 0.22 23.9 2.1 79.1 CORSACS-1 NX8 12 Jan 2006 77.50 −175.75 31 56 0.08 0.42 0.35 29.2 2.1 79.9 CORSACS-1 NX8 12 Jan 2006 77.50 −175.75 31 76 0.13 0.79 0.66 29.1 2.3 86.6 CORSACS-1 NX8 12 Jan 2006 77.50 −175.75 31 96 0.10 0.97 0.87 28.7 2.3 81.8 CORSACS-1 NX8 12 Jan 2006 77.50 −175.75 31 146 0.15 1.65 1.50 30.0 2.3 83.5 CORSACS-1 NX8 12 Jan 2006 77.50 −175.75 31 196 0.19 2.69 2.50 31.0 2.4 85.5 CORSACS-1 NX8 12 Jan 2006 77.50 −175.75 31 296 0.24 5.32 5.08 30.2 2.3 90.2 CORSACS-1 NX9 14 Jan 2006 78.65 −164.71 13 6 0.16 1.71 1.55 21.3 1.6 87.3 CORSACS-1 NX9 14 Jan 2006 78.65 −164.71 13 16 0.13 1.81 1.68 21.7 1.6 87.5 CORSACS-1 NX9 14 Jan 2006 78.65 −164.71 13 36 0.15 1.47 1.32 23.1 1.7 88.1 CORSACS-1 NX9 14 Jan 2006 78.65 −164.71 13 56 0.13 1.50 1.38 24.1 1.8 82.3 CORSACS-1 NX9 14 Jan 2006 78.65 −164.71 13 76 0.21 2.00 1.79 24.8 1.9 89.9 CORSACS-1 NX9 14 Jan 2006 78.65 −164.71 13 96 0.21 1.89 1.69 25.3 1.8 90.6 CORSACS-1 NX9 14 Jan 2006 78.65 −164.71 13 146 0.33 10.79 10.46 26.3 1.9 91.1 CORSACS-1 NX9 14 Jan 2006 78.65 −164.71 13 196 0.19 1.90 1.71 27.8 2.0 83.3 CORSACS-1 NX9 14 Jan 2006 78.65 −164.71 13 296 0.11 2.43 2.32 29.6 2.1 88.4 CORSACS-1 NX10 19 Jan 2006 75.00 164.99 29 6 0.28 1.10 0.82 20.8 1.3 62.1 CORSACS-1 NX10 19 Jan 2006 75.00 164.99 29 16 0.18 1.11 0.93 29.2 1.2 61.6 CORSACS-1 NX10 19 Jan 2006 75.00 164.99 29 36 0.19 1.02 0.83 23.6 1.7 67.4 CORSACS-1 NX10 19 Jan 2006 75.00 164.99 29 56 0.19 1.26 1.07 28.1 2.2 76.1 CORSACS-1 NX10 19 Jan 2006 75.00 164.99 29 76 0.30 1.64 1.34 28.2 2.2 75.5 CORSACS-1 NX10 19 Jan 2006 75.00 164.99 29 96 0.35 1.74 1.39 28.4 2.3 74.9 CORSACS-1 NX10 19 Jan 2006 75.00 164.99 29 146 0.40 1.92 1.52 28.3 2.2 74.7 CORSACS-1 NX10 19 Jan 2006 75.00 164.99 29 196 0.28 1.68 1.40 26.8 2.1 69.0 CORSACS-1 NX10 19 Jan 2006 75.00 164.99 29 296 0.34 1.76 1.42 27.8 2.2 73.1 CORSACS-1 NX10 19 Jan 2006 75.00 164.99 29 496 0.69 ND ND 35.0 2.0 78.4 CORSACS-1 NX10 19 Jan 2006 75.00 164.99 29 596 0.64 ND ND 34.0 2.0 80.3 CORSACS-1 NX10 19 Jan 2006 75.00 164.99 29 696 0.68 ND ND 34.1 2.0 77.8 CORSACS-1 NX10 19 Jan 2006 75.00 164.99 29 796 0.64 ND ND 33.9 2.0 77.6 CORSACS-1 NX11 21 Jan 2006 75.00 171.43 43 6 0.27 0.35 0.08 19.4 1.2 56.1 CORSACS-1 NX11 21 Jan 2006 75.00 171.43 43 16 0.08 0.21 0.13 19.4 1.2 55.6 CORSACS-1 NX11 21 Jan 2006 75.00 171.43 43 36 0.08 0.28 0.19 19.5 1.3 56.2 CORSACS-1 NX11 21 Jan 2006 75.00 171.43 43 56 0.09 0.41 0.33 26.2 2.1 77.0 CORSACS-1 NX11 21 Jan 2006 75.00 171.43 43 76 0.12 0.70 0.58 29.1 2.3 81.5 CORSACS-1 NX11 21 Jan 2006 75.00 171.43 43 96 0.20 1.97 1.77 30.9 2.3 85.5 CORSACS-1 NX11 21 Jan 2006 75.00 171.43 43 146 0.18 3.03 2.85 29.8 2.6 81.7 CORSACS-1 NX11 21 Jan 2006 75.00 171.43 43 196 0.21 3.55 3.34 30.5 2.3 83.5 CORSACS-1 NX11 21 Jan 2006 75.00 171.43 43 296 0.33 3.74 3.41 30.7 2.3 82.3 CORSACS-1 NX11 21 Jan 2006 75.00 171.43 43 396 0.42 ND ND 30.7 2.4 87.3 CORSACS-1 NX11 21 Jan 2006 75.00 171.43 43 496 1.31 ND ND 30.3 2.3 83.9 CORSACS-2 NX12 8 Nov 2006 65.21 −174.73 27 6 0.15 0.22 0.08 30.6 2.2 64.0 CORSACS-2 NX12 8 Nov 2006 65.21 −174.73 27 16 0.08 0.18 0.11 30.6 2.2 64.2 CORSACS-2 NX12 8 Nov 2006 65.21 −174.73 27 36 0.07 0.19 0.12 30.7 2.2 68.8 CORSACS-2 NX12 8 Nov 2006 65.21 −174.73 27 56 0.06 0.20 0.14 30.8 2.2 63.7 CORSACS-2 NX12 8 Nov 2006 65.21 −174.73 27 76 0.10 0.19 0.08 31.0 2.3 64.0 CORSACS-2 NX12 8 Nov 2006 65.21 −174.73 27 96 0.08 0.29 0.21 31.2 2.2 66.1 CORSACS-2 NX12 8 Nov 2006 65.21 −174.73 27 146 0.18 0.34 0.16 34.6 2.5 78.4 CORSACS-2 NX12 8 Nov 2006 65.21 −174.73 27 196 0.21 0.34 0.13 34.2 2.4 86.1 CORSACS-2 NX12 8 Nov 2006 65.21 −174.73 27 296 0.27 0.39 0.12 33.6 2.3 88.1 CORSACS-2 NX12 8 Nov 2006 65.21 −174.73 27 600 0.47 ND ND 33.0 2.3 94.0 CORSACS-2 NX12 8 Nov 2006 65.21 −174.73 27 900 0.45 ND ND 32.6 2.3 102.9 CORSACS-2 NX12 8 Nov 2006 65.21 −174.73 27 965 0.34 ND ND 32.6 2.3 104.9 CORSACS-2 NX12 8 Nov 2006 65.21 −174.73 27 1265 0.38 ND ND 32.9 2.3 104.9 CORSACS-2 NX13 16 Nov 2006 76.05 171.39 23 6 0.12 1.07 0.95 25.3 1.9 82.0 CORSACS-2 NX13 16 Nov 2006 76.05 171.39 23 16 0.07 1.33 1.26 27.7 2.1 81.9 CORSACS-2 NX13 16 Nov 2006 76.05 171.39 23 36 0.23 3.18 2.95 30.7 2.3 83.1 CORSAC