Abstract:Harnessing the full potential of the metal-based Laser Powder Bed Fusion process (LPBF) relies heavily on how effectively the overall reliability and stability of the manufactured part can be ensured. To this aim, the recent advances in sensorization and processing of the associated signals using Machine Learning (ML) techniques have made in situ monitoring a viable alternative to post-mortem techniques such as X-ray tomography or ultrasounds for the assessment of parts. Indeed, the primary advantage of in situ monitoring over post-mortem analysis is that the process can be stopped in case of discrepancies, saving resources. Additionally, mitigations to repair the discrepancies can also be performed. However, the in situ monitoring strategies based on classifying processing regimes reported in the literature so far operate on signals of fixed length in time, constraining the generalization of the trained ML model by not allowing monitoring processes with heterogeneous laser scanning strategies. As a part of this work, we try to bridge this gap by developing a hybrid Deep Learning (DL) model by combining Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) with Long-Short Term Memory (LSTM) that can operate over variable time-scales. The proposed hybrid DL model was trained on signals obtained from a heterogeneous time-synced sensing system consisting of four sensors, namely back reflection (BR), Visible, Infra-Red (IR), and structure-borne Acoustic Emission (AE). The signals captured different phenomena related to the LPBF process zone and were used to classify three regimes: Lack of Fusion (LoF), conduction mode and Keyhole. Specifically, these three regimes were induced by printing cubes out of austenitic Stainless steel (316L) on a mini-LPBF device with operando high-speed synchrotron X-ray imaging and signal acquisition with the developed heterogeneous sensing system. The operando X-ray imaging analysis ensured that the regimes correlated with the defined process parameters. During the validation procedure of the trained hybrid DL model, the model predicted three regimes with an accuracy of ≈ 98% across various time scales, ranging from 0.5 ms to 4 ms. In addition to tracking the model performance, a sensitivity analysis on the trained hybrid model was conducted, which showed that the BR and AE sensors carried more relevant information to guide the decision-making process than the other two sensors used in this work.

In-situ Monitoring in Laser Powder Bed Fusion Based on Acoustic Signal Time-Frequency Synchrosqueezing Transform and Multi-Scale Spatially Interactive Fusion Convolutional Neural Network

A Novel Approach of Online Monitoring for Laser Powder Bed Fusion Defects: Air-borne Acoustic Emission and Deep Transfer Learning

Intra-layer and inter-layer monitoring of laser powder bed fusion defects based on airborne acoustic and gn-Res model: pore and deformation

In-situ visual monitoring for multi-scale defects detection in laser powder bed fusion

Defect Prediction in Laser Powder Bed Fusion with the Combination of Simulated Melt Pool Images and Thermal Images

Inference of highly time-resolved melt pool visual characteristics and spatially-dependent lack-of-fusion defects in laser powder bed fusion using acoustic and thermal emission data

Multi-source Information Fusion for Enhanced In-Process Quality Monitoring of Laser Powder Bed Fusion Additive Manufacturing

Research on an Online Monitoring Device for the Powder Laying Process of Laser Powder Bed Fusion

Convolutional Neural Network Assisted Infrared Imaging Technology: an Enhanced Online Processing State Monitoring Method for Laser Powder Bed Fusion

In-situ crack and keyhole pore detection in laser directed energy deposition through acoustic signal and deep learning

A feature-level multi-sensor fusion approach for in-situ quality monitoring of selective laser melting

A deep convolutional network combining layerwise images and defect parameter vectors for laser powder bed fusion process anomalies classification

Deep Learning-Based Monitoring of Laser Powder Bed Fusion Process on Variable Time-Scales Using Heterogeneous Sensing and Operando X-Ray Radiography Guidance

Direct mechanistic connection between acoustic signals and melt pool morphology during laser powder bed fusion

Acoustic Emission for Surface Quality Monitoring in Laser Shock Peening Via Dual-Feature Fusion Convolution Neural Network

Data-fusion for in-situ monitoring and molten state identification during LPBF of NiCoCr medium-entropy alloy

Imbalanced Data Generation and Fusion for In-Situ Monitoring of Laser Powder Bed Fusion

Low-rank Adaptive Transfer Learning Based for Multi-Label Defect Detection in Laser Powder Bed Fusion

Machine‐Learning‐Based Monitoring of Laser Powder Bed Fusion

Predicting Laser Powder Bed Fusion Defects Through In-Process Monitoring Data and Machine Learning