Abstract:The decisions of whether and how to evacuate during a climate disaster are influenced by a wide range of factors, including emergency messaging, social influences, and sociodemographics. Further complexity is introduced when multiple hazards occur simultaneously, such as a flood evacuation taking place amid a viral pandemic that requires physical distancing. Such multihazard events can necessitate a nuanced navigation of competing decision-making strategies wherein a desire to follow peers is weighed against contagion risks. To better understand these trade-offs, we distributed an online survey during a COVID-19 pandemic surge in July 2020 to 600 individuals in three midwestern and three southern states in the United States with high risk of flooding. In this paper, we estimate a random parameter discrete choice model in both preference space and willingness-to-pay space. The results of our model show that the directionality and magnitude of the influence of peers' choices of whether and how to evacuate vary widely across respondents. Overall, the decision of whether to evacuate is positively impacted by peer behavior, while the decision of how to evacuate (i.e., ride-type selection) is negatively impacted by peer influence. Furthermore, an increase in flood threat level lessens the magnitude of peer impacts. In terms of the COVID-19 pandemic impacts, respondents who perceive it to be a major health risk are more reluctant to evacuate, but this effect is mitigated by increased flood threat level. These findings have important implications for the design of tailored emergency messaging strategies and the role of shared rides in multihazard evacuations. Specifically, emphasizing or deemphasizing the severity of each threat in a multihazard scenario may assist in: (1) encouraging a reprioritization of competing risk perceptions; and (2) magnifying or neutralizing the impacts of social influence, thereby (3) nudging evacuation decision-making toward a desired outcome.

Influences of Social Networks, Demographics, and Evacuation Duration on Evacuation Decisions: Insights from Ohio and Pennsylvania

Relocation and Social Support during Large-Scale Evacuations

DECISION MAKING AND GROUP BEHAVIORS IN A BUILDING EVACUATION EXPERIMENTS CONSIDERING OCCUPANCY SOCIAL NETWORK

Influence of Departure Time Spans and Corresponding Network Performance on Evacuation Time

Exploring Family Ties and Interpersonal Dynamics—A Geospatial Simulation Analyzing Their Influence on Evacuation Efficiency within Urban Communities

Impacts of information from various sources on the evacuation decision-making process during no-notice evacuations in campus environment

Protection or Peril of Following the Crowd in a Pandemic-Concurrent Flood Evacuation

Natural disaster evacuation modeling: the dichotomy of fear of crime and social influence

Decision-making and group behaviors in a building evacuation experiments considering occupancy social network

Social Vulnerabilities and Wildfire Evacuations: A Case Study of the 2019 Kincade Fire

Measuring and Modeling Behavioral Decision Dynamics in Collective Evacuation

Effects of Data Resolution and Human Behavior on Large Scale Evacuation Simulations

Travel time reliability during evacuation

Should I Stay or Should I Go Now? Or Should I Wait and See? Influences on Wildfire Evacuation Decisions

Modeling and predicting evacuation flows during hurricane Irma

Who Leaves and Who Stays? A Review and Statistical Meta-Analysis of Hurricane Evacuation Studies

Estimating pre-impact and post-impact evacuation behaviors – An empirical study of hurricane Ida in coastal Louisiana and Mississippi

Household Evacuation Decision Making During Simultaneous Events: Hurricane Ida and the COVID-19 Pandemic

Joint modeling of evacuation departure and travel times in hurricanes

Impact of risk preferences on evacuee behavior and attention distribution in urban underground space evacuations

Empirical Study of Individual Evacuation Decision-making in Fire Accidents: Evacuate Intention and Herding Effect.