Abstract:Deep neural networks (DNNs) have achieved state-of-the-art performance in various learning tasks, such as computer vision, natural language processing, and speech recognition. However, the fundamental theory of generalization still remains obscure in deep learning-why DNN models can generalize well, despite that they are heavily overparametrized in both depth and width? Recently, some work shows that traditional theory of analyzing the generalization error of learning models fails to explain the generalization of DNNs. The failure is mainly because of one simple fact that the worse case analysis of generalization error for learning models would be too loose for models with large parameter space, such as DNNs. In this work, we propose a new analysis of generalization in DNNs from an optimal transport perspective. Unlike traditional worse-case uniform convergence analysis in learning theory, our analysis of generalization error is dependent on both the learning algorithm and the data distribution and is the average-case analysis. Thus, our theory can be more practical and accurate to describe the generalization behavior of DNNs. More specifically, in this article, we try to answer a fundamental yet unsolved question in deep learning-why deeper models can generalize well than shallow models? The main contribution of this article can be summarized in four aspects. First, under a general learning framework, we derive upper bounds on the generalization error of learning algorithms by their algorithmic transport cost: the expected Wasserstein distance between the output hypothesis and the output hypothesis conditioned on an input example. We further provide several upper bounds on the algorithmic transport cost in terms of total variation distance, relative entropy, and Vapnik-Chervonenkis (VC) dimension. Moreover, we also study different conditions for loss functions under which the generalization error of a learning algorithm can be upper bounded by different probability metrics between distributions relating to the output hypothesis and/or the input data. Finally, under our established framework, we obtain our main results, showing that the generalization error in DNNs decreases exponentially to zero as the number of layers increases.

Convergence Analysis for Over-Parameterized Deep Learning

A Convergence Theory Towards Practical Over-parameterized Deep Neural Networks

A Local Convergence Theory for Mildly Over-Parameterized Two-Layer Neural Network

Convex Formulation of Overparameterized Deep Neural Networks

A global convergence theory for deep ReLU implicit networks via over-parameterization

Convergence Analysis of Deep Residual Networks

Full error analysis for the training of deep neural networks

Theoretical Issues in Deep Networks: Approximation, Optimization and Generalization

Convergence Analysis of Natural Gradient Descent for Over-parameterized Physics-Informed Neural Networks

Over-parameterized Adversarial Training: An Analysis Overcoming the Curse of Dimensionality

An Optimal Transport Analysis on Generalization in Deep Learning

Convergence Rate Analysis for Deep Ritz Method

Global Convergence Analysis of Deep Linear Networks with A One-neuron Layer

A Convergence Analysis of Gradient Descent for Deep Linear Neural Networks

Sparse deep neural networks for nonparametric estimation in high-dimensional sparse regression

Mathematical Models of Overparameterized Neural Networks

Early Stage Convergence and Global Convergence of Training Mildly Parameterized Neural Networks

Convergence Guarantees of Overparametrized Wide Deep Inverse Prior

Understanding over-parameterized deep networks by geometrization

Analysis of the expected $L_2$ error of an over-parametrized deep neural network estimate learned by gradient descent without regularization

Nonparametric regression using over-parameterized shallow ReLU neural networks