Abstract:As a new programming paradigm, deep learning (DL) has achieved impressive performance in areas such as image processing and speech recognition, and has expanded its application to solve many real-world problems. However, neural networks and DL are normally black-box systems; even worse, DL-based software are vulnerable to threats from abnormal examples, such as adversarial and backdoored examples constructed by attackers with malicious intentions as well as unintentionally mislabeled samples. Therefore, it is important and urgent to detect such abnormal examples. Although various detection approaches have been proposed respectively addressing some specific types of abnormal examples, they suffer from some limitations; until today, this problem is still of considerable interest. In this work, we first propose a novel characterization to distinguish abnormal examples from normal ones based on the observation that abnormal examples have significantly different (adversarial) robustness from normal ones. We systemically analyze those three different types of abnormal samples in terms of robustness and find that they have different characteristics from normal ones. As robustness measurement is computationally expensive and hence can be challenging to scale to large networks, we then propose to effectively and efficiently measure robustness of an input sample using the cost of adversarially attacking the input, which was originally proposed to test robustness of neural networks against adversarial examples. Next, we propose a novel detection method, named attack as detection (A 2 D for short), which uses the cost of adversarially attacking an input instead of robustness to check if it is abnormal. Our detection method is generic, and various adversarial attack methods could be leveraged. Extensive experiments show that A 2 D is more effective than recent promising approaches that were proposed to detect only one specific type of abnormal examples. We also thoroughly discuss possible adaptive attack methods to our adversarial example detection method and show that A 2 D is still effective in defending carefully designed adaptive adversarial attack methods—for example, the attack success rate drops to 0% on CIFAR10.

DFDS: Data-Free Dual Substitutes Hard-Label Black-Box Adversarial Attack

D-DAE: Defense-Penetrating Model Extraction Attacks.

Towards Efficient Data Free Blackbox Adversarial Attack

Attack As Detection: Using Adversarial Attack Methods to Detect Abnormal Examples.

DaST: Data-free Substitute Training for Adversarial Attacks

FE-DaST: Fast and Effective Data-Free Substitute Training for Black-Box Adversarial Attacks

Delving into Data: Effectively Substitute Training for Black-box Attack

A Universal Defense Strategy Against Adversarial Attacks Based on Attention-Guided

DifAttack++: Query-Efficient Black-Box Adversarial Attack via Hierarchical Disentangled Feature Space in Cross-Domain

DST: Dynamic Substitute Training for Data-free Black-box Attack

Data-free Defense of Black Box Models Against Adversarial Attacks

Policy-Driven Attack: Learning to Query for Hard-label Black-box Adversarial Examples.

Data-Free Hard-Label Robustness Stealing Attack

Defeating deep learning based de-anonymization attacks with adversarial example

DFB: A Data-Free, Low-Budget, and High-Efficacy Clean-Label Backdoor Attack

DCVAE-adv: A Universal Adversarial Example Generation Method for White and Black Box Attacks

Efficient Decision-Based Black-Box Adversarial Attacks on Face Recognition

Evolutionary Multilabel Adversarial Examples: an Effective Black-Box Attack

Boosting Black-Box Attack to Deep Neural Networks With Conditional Diffusion Models

Privacy-preserving Universal Adversarial Defense for Black-box Models

LSD: Adversarial Examples Detection Based on Label Sequences Discrepancy