Abstract:Background: Word embeddings have been prevalently used in biomedical Natural Language Processing (NLP) applications due to the ability of the vector representations being able to capture useful semantic properties and linguistic relationships between words. Different textual resources (e.g., Wikipedia and biomedical literature corpus) have been utilized in biomedical NLP to train word embeddings and these word embeddings have been commonly leveraged as feature input to downstream machine learning models. However, there has been little work on evaluating the word embeddings trained from different textual resources. Methods: In this study, we empirically evaluated word embeddings trained from four different corpora, namely clinical notes, biomedical publications, Wikipedia, and news. For the former two resources, we trained word embeddings using unstructured electronic health record (EHR) data available at Mayo Clinic and articles (MedLit) from PubMed Central, respectively. For the latter two resources, we used publicly available pre-trained word embeddings, GloVe and Google News. The evaluation was done qualitatively and quantitatively. For the qualitative evaluation, we randomly selected medical terms from three categories (i.e., disorder, symptom, and drug), and manually inspected the five most similar words computed by embeddings for each term. We also analyzed the word embeddings through a 2-dimensional visualization plot of 377 medical terms. For the quantitative evaluation, we conducted both intrinsic and extrinsic evaluation. For the intrinsic evaluation, we evaluated the word embeddings' ability to capture medical semantics by measruing the semantic similarity between medical terms using four published datasets: Pedersen's dataset, Hliaoutakis's dataset, MayoSRS, and UMNSRS. For the extrinsic evaluation, we applied word embeddings to multiple downstream biomedical NLP applications, including clinical information extraction (IE), biomedical information retrieval (IR), and relation extraction (RE), with data from shared tasks. Results: The qualitative evaluation shows that the word embeddings trained from EHR and MedLit can find more similar medical terms than those trained from GloVe and Google News. The intrinsic quantitative evaluation verifies that the semantic similarity captured by the word embeddings trained from EHR is closer to human experts' judgments on all four tested datasets. The extrinsic quantitative evaluation shows that the word embeddings trained on EHR achieved the best F1 score of 0.900 for the clinical IE task; no word embeddings improved the performance for the biomedical IR task; and the word embeddings trained on Google News had the best overall F1 score of 0.790 for the RE task. Conclusion: Based on the evaluation results, we can draw the following conclusions. First, the word embeddings trained from EHR and MedLit can capture the semantics of medical terms better, and find semantically relevant medical terms closer to human experts' judgments than those trained from GloVe and Google News. Second, there does not exist a consistent global ranking of word embeddings for all downstream biomedical NLP applications. However, adding word embeddings as extra features will improve results on most downstream tasks. Finally, the word embeddings trained from the biomedical domain corpora do not necessarily have better performance than those trained from the general domain corpora for any downstream biomedical NLP task.

An Empirical Study on the Potential of Word Embedding Techniques in Bug Report Management Tasks

An empirical assessment of different word embedding and deep learning models for bug assignment

Improving Automated Bug Triaging with Specialized Topic Model.

Inside Bug Report Templates: an Empirical Study on Bug Report Templates in Open-Source Software

Automated Configuration Bug Report Prediction Using Text Mining.

A Comparative Study of Text Embedding Models for Semantic Text Similarity in Bug Reports

Mining Coherent Topics in Documents Using Word Embeddings and Large-Scale Text Data

Automatic Defect Categorization Based on Fault Triggering Conditions

Combining Word Embedding with Information Retrieval to Recommend Similar Bug Reports

BLESER: Bug Localization Based on Enhanced Semantic Retrieval

High-Impact Bug Report Identification with Imbalanced Learning Strategies

A Comparative Study of Transformer-based Neural Text Representation Techniques on Bug Triaging

Combining Text Mining and Data Mining for Bug Report Classification

LLM-BRC: A large language model-based bug report classification framework

Watch out for Version Mismtaching and Data Leakage! A Case Study of Their Influence in Bug Report Based Bug Localization Models

Combining Retrieval and Classification: Balancing Efficiency and Accuracy in Duplicate Bug Report Detection

Automated Identification of High Impact Bug Reports Leveraging Imbalanced Learning Strategies

How Practitioners Perceive Automated Bug Report Management Techniques

Compositional Vector Space Models for Improved Bug Localization

Evaluating Word Embedding Models: Methods and Experimental Results

A comparison of word embeddings for the biomedical natural language processing