Abstract:BioanalysisVol. 8, No. 18 EditorialFree AccessChemical derivatization-based LC–MS for metabolomics: advantages and challengesRuiqi Jiang, Yu Jiao & Fengguo XuRuiqi Jiang Key Laboratory of Drug Quality Control & Pharmacovigilance, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing 210009, P. R. China State Key Laboratory of Natural Medicine, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing 210009, P. R. China Key Laboratory of Drug Quality Control & Pharmacovigilance, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing 210009, P. R. China State Key Laboratory of Natural Medicine, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing 210009, P. R. China, Yu Jiao State Key Laboratory of Natural Medicine, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing 210009, P. R. China Department of Organic Chemistry, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing 210009, P. R. China State Key Laboratory of Natural Medicine, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing 210009, P. R. China Department of Organic Chemistry, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing 210009, P. R. China & Fengguo Xu*Author for correspondence: E-mail Address: fengguoxu@gmail.com Key Laboratory of Drug Quality Control & Pharmacovigilance, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing 210009, P. R. China State Key Laboratory of Natural Medicine, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing 210009, P. R. China Key Laboratory of Drug Quality Control & Pharmacovigilance, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing 210009, P. R. China State Key Laboratory of Natural Medicine, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing 210009, P. R. ChinaPublished Online:15 Aug 2016https://doi.org/10.4155/bio-2016-0192AboutSectionsPDF/EPUB ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinkedInReddit Keywords: chemical derivatizationLC–MSmetabolomicsFirst draft submitted: 15 July 2016; Accepted for publication: 25 July 2016; Published online: 15 August 2016General aspectsMetabolomics is a systemic methodology aiming at measuring all altered endogenous low-molecular-weight metabolites (usually <1500 Da) in cell, tissue or the whole organism. Generally, according to the number of detected metabolites as well as the reliability of quantification method used, metabolomics can be categorized into two strategies: untargeted and targeted. The broad scale of measured metabolites is the goal of untargeted metabolomics, while as for targeted metabolomics, much more attentions will be given to the quantitative analysis of a subset of metabolites in a selected metabolic pathway. Each strategy has their own advantages and limitations. Untargeted metabolomics was usually performed first to screen out the key differential metabolites and the related metabolic pathway. A followed-up targeted metabolomics could be further conducted to validate these findings and uncover more detailed relationship among differential metabolites.MS and NMR are two main analytical technologies applied in metabolomics research. MS is surpassing the use of NMR at a 5:2 ratio and is becoming the dominant analytical platform due to its inherent high sensitivity, rapid improvement of instruments and flexible compatibility with chromatographic separation [1]. LC and GC are both effective separation strategies for metabolomics when combined with MS. Because of the differences in separation and ionization mechanisms, both platforms hold their own strengths and limitations. GC–MS is always applied to analyze volatile compounds, derivatization is an indispensable part to transform analytes into volatile and thermally stable derivatives. However, multipeak and multi-origination phenomena derived from derivatization-based GC–MS could influence the interpretation of metabolic pathways [2]. LC–MS has become a preferred analytical platform for its various separation mechanisms and 'soft' ionization. Especially the introduction of UPLC, have profound implications for high-throughput metabolomics analysis.The metabolome is the terminal product of genome and proteome, consisting of thousands of metabolites with a wide concentration range and various physicochemical properties in complex biological samples. Analyzing as many metabolites as possible in a single LC–MS run is challenging as a large number of compounds are poorly ionizable or have poor retention time. In this regard, chemical derivatization could introduce novel functional groups and transform analytes into MS-detectable and LC-separable derivatives. Large quantity of emerging derivatization reagents for metabolites have been synthesized over the last decade [3], they were designed for respective metabolites with different functional groups such as amines, phenols, carboxylic acids, steroids, thiols and alcohols [4]. The enhancement of detectability is the main purpose of derivatization-based LC–MS through increasing evaporation and nebulization efficiency, introducing chargeable or easily ionizable moieties and aiding fragmentation in the MRM mode [4–6]. Interestingly, a new strategy that integrates several subsets of metabolites with different functional groups together by derivatization-based LC–MS for untargeted metabolomics has been proposed [7]. In this way, the coverage of metabolites, the selectivity and sensitivity could be improved significantly compared with conventional LC–MS-based metabolomics.The design & selection of optimal derivatization reagentsWith the increasing demand of analyzing thousands of metabolites in a single LC–MS run, various derivatization reagents with diverse chemical structures and properties were designed [8]. However, the lack of systematic study in this field limits its wide application. So far there is still no mature theory to guide the design and selection of new reagents. To obtain optimal derivatization reagents, several points should be taken into consideration: The activity of reacting groups;The stability of derivatives;The efficiency of ionization;The hydrophobicity of derivatives.Physicochemical parameters, such as pKa, logP, polar surface area [9], proton affinity [10], WAPS [11], may reflect the above properties to some extent so as to aid to design and select the derivatization reagents for LC–MS. Prior to analyzing the actual samples, these parameters could help us to evaluate the efficiency of the candidate reagents.As the process of ionization in MS is very complex, the above-mentioned parameter alone cannot be used to assess and predict the performance of derivatization reagents. How to integrate the above physicochemical parameters reasonably to guide the design of chemical derivatization reagents and selection is still an issue that needs to be addressed.Challenges in metabolite identificationMetabolite identification is still at a bottleneck in terms of LC–MS-based metabolomics research. It is fairly difficult to convert enormous analytical data into meaningful biological information. Sumner et al. divided metabolite identification into four levels: 'positively identified compounds, putatively identified compounds, compounds putatively identified in a compound class and unknown compounds' [12]. It is estimated that approximately 5000 compounds with commercially available authentic standards can be positively identified among 200,000 metabolites at the percentage of 2.5% [13]. The remaining 97.5% metabolites could only be putatively identified referring to the databases or the structure analogs that were commercially available. In recent years, the databases for LC–MS metabolomics including HMDB [14], METLIN [15], MassBank [16] have been accessed freely, which enhance the feasibility for metabolite identification. As for derivatization-based LC–MS, the introduction of a known-shared chemical structure into the original compounds could also add values to the identification of metabolites. Li and colleagues reported a locally constructed library based on dansylation LC–MS-based metabolomics that covers amine- and phenol-containing metabolites [17], extending the strength of chemical derivatization on metabolite identification.As described above, there are about 97.5% metabolites that cannot be positively identified using commercially available authentic standards. How to predict the possible structure of them is a challenge in metabolite identification. In LC–MS, diagnostic ions derived from a set of known patterns are usually used to predict the structure of unknown metabolites, especially for compounds that are structural analogs. Chemical derivatization may be an alternative way to facilitate the prediction of unknown key metabolites. Generally, the specific fragment of derivatized compound induced by CID originates from derivatization reagent moiety, and the residual moiety is related to intact analyte. Thus, based on the fragmentation patterns of the known residual moieties, the possible chemical structures of unknown metabolites could be recognized without authentic standards.Conclusion & future perspectiveChemical derivatization-based LC–MS is an emerging strategy for metabolomics research. The introduction of chemical moiety could extend the metabolite coverage, improve the LC separation and MS detection for both untargeted and targeted metabolomics. However, there are still many challenges existing in this new strategy. General principles for the design and selection of optimal derivatization reagents should be summarized to guide the researchers. In order to promote the identification of unknown metabolites, shared databases for derivatized compounds should be developed, although this may be a tough project.Although effective, the limitations of chemical derivatization such as time-taken, introduction of variations and by-product formation must be considered and evaluated. In the near future, with the development of new specific derivative reagents that have high reaction selectivity for LC–MS, the application of metabolomics in, for example, the fields of pharmaceutical research, food-safety evaluation, environmental monitoring and precision medicine study will be greatly extended.Financial & competing interests disclosureThe authors have no relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript. This includes employment, consultancies, honoraria, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, grants or patents received or pending, or royalties.No writing assistance was utilized in the production of this manuscript.References1 Cajka T, Fiehn O. Toward merging untargeted and targeted methods in mass spectrometry-based metabolomics and lipidomics. Anal. Chem. 88(1), 524–545 (2015).Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar2 Xu F, Zou L, Ong CN. Experiment-originated variations, and multi-peak and multi-origination phenomena in derivatization-based GC–MS metabolomics. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 29(3), 269–280 (2010).Crossref, CAS, Google Scholar3 Higashi T, Ogawa S. Isotope-coded ESI-enhancing derivatization reagents for differential analysis, quantification and profiling of metabolites in biological samples by LC/MS: a review. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. doi: 10.1016/j.jpba.2016.04.033 (2016) (Epub ahead of print).Google Scholar4 Xu F, Zou L, Liu Y, Zhang Z, Ong CN. Enhancement of the capabilities of liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry with derivatization: general principles and applications. Mass Spectrom. Rev. 30(6), 1143–1172 (2011).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar5 He Y, Zhao X-E, Zhu S et al. In situ derivatization-ultrasound-assisted dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction for the determination of neurotransmitters in Parkinson's rat brain microdialysates by ultra high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. A 1458, 70–81 (2016).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar6 Huang Q, Liu D, Xin B et al. Quantification of monosialogangliosides in human plasma through chemical derivatization for signal enhancement in LC–ESI-MS. Anal. Chim. Acta 929, 31–38 (2016).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar7 Luo X, Zhao S, Huan T et al. High-performance chemical isotope labeling liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry for profiling the metabolomic reprogramming elicited by ammonium limitation in yeast. J. Proteome Res. 15(5), 1602–1612 (2016).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar8 Zhu Y, Deng P, Zhong D. Derivatization methods for LC–MS analysis of endogenous compounds. Bioanalysis 7(19), 2557–2581 (2015).Link, CAS, Google Scholar9 Niwa M. Chemical derivatization as a tool for optimizing MS response in sensitive LC–MS/MS bioanalysis and its role in pharmacokinetic studies. Bioanalysis 4(2), 213–220 (2012).Link, CAS, Google Scholar10 Hunter EP, Lias SG. Evaluated gas phase basicities and proton affinities of molecules: an update. J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 27(3), 413–656 (1998).Crossref, CAS, Google Scholar11 Kruve A, Kaupmees K, Liigand J, Leito I. Negative electrospray ionization via deprotonation: predicting the ionization efficiency. Anal. Chem. 86(10), 4822–4830 (2014).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar12 Sumner LW, Amberg A, Barrett D et al. Proposed minimum reporting standards for chemical analysis. Metabolomics 3(3), 211–221 (2007).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar13 Wishart DS. Advances in metabolite identification. Bioanalysis 3(15), 1769–1782 (2011).Link, CAS, Google Scholar14 Wishart DS, Jewison T, Guo AC et al. HMDB 3.0 – the human metabolome database in 2013. Nucl. Acids Res. 41, D801–D807 (2012).Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar15 Smith CA, O'maille G, Want EJ et al. METLIN: a metabolite mass spectral database. Ther. Drug Monit. 27(6), 747–751 (2005).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar16 Horai H, Arita M, Kanaya S et al. MassBank: a public repository for sharing mass spectral data for life sciences. J. Mass Spectrom. 45(7), 703–714 (2010).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar17 Huan T, Tang C, Li R, Shi Y, Lin G, Li L. MyCompoundID MS/MS search: metabolite identification using a library of predicted fragment-ion-spectra of 383,830 possible human metabolites. Anal. Chem. 87(20), 10619–10626 (2015).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google ScholarFiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited ByA rapid and robust method for amino acid quantification using a simple N-hydroxysuccinimide ester derivatization and liquid chromatography-ion mobility-mass spectrometry26 March 2022 | Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, Vol. 414, No. 18Ion-Pairing Chromatography and Amine Derivatization Provide Complementary Approaches for the Targeted LC-MS Analysis of the Polar Metabolome10 May 2022 | Journal of Proteome Research, Vol. 21, No. 6Progress and Challenges in Quantifying Carbonyl-Metabolomic Phenomes with LC-MS/MS12 October 2021 | Molecules, Vol. 26, No. 20New prospects and problems in sample preparation methods for microbiome analysisTrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry, Vol. 143An Integrated Strategy for Rapid Discovery and Identification of Quality Markers in Gardenia Fructus Using an Omics Discrimination-Grey Correlation-Biological Verification Method24 June 2021 | Frontiers in Pharmacology, Vol. 12Quantitative analysis of the relationship of derivatization reagents and detection sensitivity of electrospray ionization-triple quadrupole tandem mass spectrometry: Hydrazines as prototypesAnalytica Chimica Acta, Vol. 1158Derivatization procedures and their analytical performances for HPLC determination in bioanalysis24 November 2020 | Biomedical Chromatography, Vol. 35, No. 1Chemoselective Probes Serving as Promising Derivatization Tools in Targeted Metabolomics Research23 April 2020 | Journal of Analysis and Testing, Vol. 4, No. 3Recent progresses of derivatization approaches in the targeted lipidomics analysis by mass spectrometry28 February 2020 | Journal of Separation Science, Vol. 43, No. 9-10Discovery and identification of antithrombotic chemical markers in Gardenia Fructus by herbal metabolomics and zebrafish modelJournal of Ethnopharmacology, Vol. 253Metabolomics in pharmacology - a delve into the novel field of pharmacometabolomics20 January 2020 | Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology, Vol. 13, No. 2LC–MS/MS method for quantification of 3,4-dihydroxyphenylglycol, a norepinephrine metabolite in plasma and brain regionsNaga Surya Prakash Padala, Devender Reddy Ajjala, Rajesh Kumar Boggavarapu, Hanumanth Rao Pantangi, Jagadeesh Babu Thentu, Abdul Rasheed Mohammed & Ramakrishna Nirogi20 June 2019 | Bioanalysis, Vol. 11, No. 10Spatio-temporal profiling of abscisic acid, indoleacetic acid and jasmonic acid in single rice seed during seed germinationAnalytica Chimica Acta, Vol. 1031Challenges in metabolomics-based disease molecular classification: an analytical perspectiveYiqiao Gao, Quan Liu & Fengguo Xu18 May 2017 | Bioanalysis, Vol. 9, No. 10Mass spectrometry in metabolomics: what lies aheadYanhua Chen & Zeper Abliz14 December 2016 | Bioanalysis, Vol. 9, No. 2 Vol. 8, No. 18 Follow us on social media for the latest updates Metrics History Published online 15 August 2016 Published in print September 2016 Information© Future Science LtdKeywordschemical derivatizationLC–MSmetabolomicsFinancial & competing interests disclosureThe authors have no relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript. This includes employment, consultancies, honoraria, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, grants or patents received or pending, or royalties.No writing assistance was utilized in the production of this manuscript.PDF download

Abstract:BioanalysisVol. 10, No. 15 EditorialFree AccessTwins derivatization-based LC–MS: a promising quantitative tool for metabolomic analysisWei Li, Zunjian Zhang & Fengguo XuWei Li Key Laboratory of Drug Quality Control & Pharmacovigilance, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing 210009, PR China State Key Laboratory of Natural Medicine, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing 210009, PR China, Zunjian Zhang**Author for correspondence: E-mail Address: zunjianzhangcpu@hotmail.com Key Laboratory of Drug Quality Control & Pharmacovigilance, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing 210009, PR China State Key Laboratory of Natural Medicine, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing 210009, PR China & Fengguo Xu*Author for correspondence: E-mail Address: fengguoxu@cpu.edu.cn Key Laboratory of Drug Quality Control & Pharmacovigilance, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing 210009, PR China State Key Laboratory of Natural Medicine, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing 210009, PR ChinaPublished Online:23 Jul 2018https://doi.org/10.4155/bio-2018-0122AboutSectionsPDF/EPUB ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinkedInReddit Keywords: absolute quantificationhigh coverageLC–MSmetabolomicstwins derivatizationChemical isotope labeling-based LC–MS for metabolomic analysisMetabolomics, a newly developed part of system biology, is widely utilized to relatively or absolutely quantify endogenous small molecules, in other words, metabolome. With its vital roles in biological processes, the metabolome has attracted more and more attention recently. In 2017, 'global metabolomics' was selected as one of the ten methods worthy watching in the coming years [1]. LC–MS based platform has become a powerful tool for metabolome analysis, owning to its high degree of specificity and sensitivity [2]. However, the development of metabolomics has been partly impeded by challenges because of the significant diversity of chemical and physical characteristics in metabolites [3]. It is difficult to identify and quantify all metabolites in LC–MS based metabolomics at once due to their wide range of concentrations, retention properties or ionization efficiencies [4].To solve this problem, the traditional strategy divides the metabolome into different parts, according to their physical properties and analyzing them separately. However, this is not feasible for metabolomics studies since they are in the demand for high throughput and coverage in a single run.Recently, many reports focused on chemical isotope labeling (CIL) in untargeted or targeted metabolomics for the purpose of wide metabolites coverage and detection sensitivity improvement. In these studies, chemical labeling reagents are introduced and specifically react with certain functional groups in analytes. Higher ionization efficiency, appropriate hydrophobic structures and suitable structures for efficient fragments can be obtained with the aid of derivatization [5]. Li et al. developed a high coverage differential 12C-/13C dansylhydrazine labeling LC/MS strategy for relative quantification of carbonyl submetabolome in urine [6]. In this research, 12C-DnsHz and 13C-DnsHz reacted with an individual or pooled sample, respectively. The 1:1 mixture of differential labeled samples were analyzed by LC–MS, followed by data analysis and peak identification. Large number of peak pairs were detected (1737), with 33 metabolites identified from constructed library standards. Similarly, they used base-activated 12C-/13C dansyl chloride labeling reaction for hydroxyl submetabolome profiling [7]. This technique reaches a prominent achievement in detection of hydroxyl metabolites because of their low MS response. Yuan and co-workers focused on fecal metabolome and carried out an integrated CIL-LC–MS method to label metabolites [8]. Four synthesized isotope labeling reagents including d4-DMED, d4-DMAP, d7-HIQB and d7-BQB along with their light labeling reagents respectively reacted with four selected submetabolome – carboxy, amine, carbonyl and thiol metabolites. The amount of detected metabolites was remarkably increased compared with previous studies, thus the study could facilitate in-depth study of the interaction between the host and intestinal flora.In order to lucubrate the biological function of metabolites in a selected pathway or category, targeted metabolomics is needed to offer better quantification ability. To this extent, CIL based LC–MS/MS is a powerful tool to cover a relatively large amount of metabolites as well as meeting quantification requirement. The main difference with CIL-based untargeted metabolomics is that a series of standard solutions with known concentration are needed and their CIL-labeled products serve as internal standards for absolute quantification. Wong et al. utilized benzoyl chloride (BzCl) as sample labeling reagents while internal standards were prepared by 13C-benzoyl chloride labeled standards [9]. In their experiment, 70 neurologically related metabolites were quantified with a short LC running time and limits of detection for most metabolites were below 10 nM.Twins derivatization-based LC–MS for metabolomic analysisCIL is an effective strategy in reducing the complexity of biological samples and improving sensitivity and accuracy of quantification. However, it is still imperfect in the following aspects: CIL reagents are expensive (especially 13C-CILs) and are sometimes unavailable or hard to synthesize; Isotopic effects on analyte retention usually derive from deuterium reagents, which can affect accurate quantification.Taking these into consideration, a new strategy called 'twins derivatization-based LC–MS (TD-LC–MS)' was newly proposed by Xu et al. [10]. In this report, they concentrated on 12 metabolites in the tryptophan pathway which were screened out in untargeted metabolomics. Since all aimed compounds contained amines or phenolic hydroxyl groups, dansyl chloride (Dns-Cl) was selected as derivatization reagents. Based on similar physiochemical properties of homologs, a structure analog N-diethyl-amino-1-naphthalene-1-sulfonyl chloride(Dens-Cl) was synthesized in a two-step reaction and verified by NMR and LC–MS. In determination, Dns-Cl was used to label samples, while Dens-Cl was used to react with mixed standards solution to generate internal standard (IS). In this way, 12 metabolites obtained their one-to-one IS with similar structures. With their resemblance in chromatographic retention and mass spectrometric behavior, TD-IS, like CIL-IS, could compensate for matrix effects in analysis, thus improve quantification accuracy. Benefiting from this strategy, the sensitivity was significantly improved by 3.6- to 400-fold [10].Furthermore, Xu et al. dramatically improved the coverage of free fatty acids (FFAs) quantification with TD-LC–MS in a recent research [11]. Taking chemical structure of FFAs into consideration, two TD reagents were designed and synthesized in the laboratory. The TD reagents, named Dns-PP (5-dimethylamino-naphthalene-1-sulfonyl piperazine) and Den-PP (diethylamino-naphthalene-1-sulfonyl piperazine) were structure analogues with a slight change from dimethyl to diethyl. Transitions of Dns-PP-labeled analytes and its TD-IS in mass MRM mode were optimized. Ions pairs were from [M+H]+ of labeled metabolites to m/z 170.1, 320.1, generated from Dns-PP or m/z 348.2, a fragment of Dens-PP. After derivatization, 38 FFAs, including short chain, medium chain or long chain, could be stably quantified with improved sensitivity of 50 to 1500-fold.In summary, the typical workflow of twins derivatization is as follows:First, TD reagents should be designed and synthesized purposefully. Second, derivatization conditions of reagents and analytes are optimized to achieve ideal MS response. Third, metabolites in biological samples are labeled with one derivatization reagent after sample preparation while TD-IS are prepared by labeling standard solutions with the other derivatization reagent. Finally, spiking labeled sample with TD-IS and analyzing by LC–MS/MS.The advantages of twins derivatization can be concluded as: improving MS ionization efficiency and chromatographic retention, thus, improving sensitivity; derivatization reagents are cheap and easily available or be synthesized; matrix effects and losses during extraction can be compensated through one-to-one internal standards.ConclusionTwins derivatization-based LC–MS is a promising quantitative tool for metabolomics analysis. It is so far utilized in the absolute quantification of metabolites in a selected pathway or category. With its advantages, it contributes to conjecture verification in untargeted metabolomics and meets the demand for high-coverage tendency in targeted metabolomics. In virtue of its favorable practicality and relative low-cost in derivatization reagents, this strategy can be learned and widely used to expand detection coverage of different metabolites.However, there are still challenges in the twins derivatization process, such as time-consuming, confusing derivatization optimization and the selection of twin reagents. System description and general principles are needed to assist researchers in TD-reagents selection. Besides, with progress and modification of this strategy, it has the potential to be further applied to untargeted metabolomics, such as CIL strategy, even though the biggest challenge is how to pick peak pairs in the mass spectra.In the near future, more attention should be given in the following aspects:Initially, quantum chemistry and machine learning techniques should be introduced to guide rational design of TD reagents structure. Furthermore, with the aid of microwave assisted synthesis, the reaction condition and time can be optimized. Additionally, an extendable all-in-one injection TD-LC–MS strategy for global targeted metabolomic analysis will be developed. Last, commercial available method package and kit development are necessary.Financial & competing interests disclosureThe authors have no relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript. This includes employment, consultancies, honoraria, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, grants or patents received or pending, or royalties.No writing assistance was utilized in the production of this manuscript.References1 Doerr A. Global metabolomics. Nat. Methods 14(1), 32–32 (2017).Crossref, CAS, Google Scholar2 Fang ZZ, Gonzalez FJ. LC–MS-based metabolomics: an update. Arch. Toxicol. 88(8), 1491–1502 (2014).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar3 Mochizuki T, Todoroki K, Inoue K, Min JZ, Toyo'oka T. Isotopic variants of light and heavy L-pyroglutamic acid succinimidyl esters as the derivatization reagents for DL-amino acid chiral metabolomics identification by liquid chromatography and electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. Anal. Chim. Acta 811, 51–59 (2014).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar4 Ortmayr K, Causon TJ, Hann S, Koellensperger G. Increasing selectivity and coverage in LC–MS based metabolome analysis. TrAC, Trends Anal. Chem. 82, 358–366 (2016).Crossref, CAS, Google Scholar5 Santa T. Derivatization in liquid chromatography for mass spectrometric detection. Drug Discov. Ther. 7(1), 9–17 (2013).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar6 Shuang Z, Dawe M, Guo K, Liang L. Development of high-performance chemical isotope labeling LC–MS for profiling the carbonyl submetabolome. Anal. Chem. 89(12), 6758–6765 (2017).Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar7 Zhao S, Luo X, Li L. Chemical isotope labeling LC–MS for high coverage and quantitative profiling of the hydroxyl submetabolome in metabolomics. Anal. Chem. 88(21), 10617–10623 (2016).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar8 Yuan BF, Zhu QF, Guo N et al. Comprehensive profiling of fecal metabolome of mice by integrated chemical isotope labeling-mass spectrometry analysis. Anal. Chem. 90(5), 3512–3520 (2018).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar9 Wong JMT, Malec PA, Mabrouk OS, Ro J, Dus M, Kennedy RT. Benzoyl chloride derivatization with liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry for targeted metabolomics of neurochemicals in biological samples. J. Chromatogr. A 1446, 78–90 (2016).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar10 Guo H, Jiao Y, Wang X, Lu T, Zhang Z, Xu F. Twins labeling-liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry based metabolomics for absolute quantification of tryptophan and its key metabolites. J. Chromatogr. A 1504, 83–90 (2017).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar11 Jiang R, Jiao Y, Zhang P et al. Twins derivatization strategy for high-coverage quantification of free fatty acids by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 89(22), 12223–12230 (2017).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google ScholarFiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited ByChemical derivatization strategy for mass spectrometry‐based lipidomics5 September 2021 | Mass Spectrometry Reviews, Vol. 42, No. 1Recent progress in the analysis of unsaturated fatty acids in biological samples by chemical derivatization-based chromatography-mass spectrometry methodsJournal of Chromatography B, Vol. 1215Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry based metabolic characterization of pleural effusion in patients with acquired EGFR-TKI resistanceJournal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis, Vol. 202Recent advances in the application of metabolomics for food safety control and food quality analyses22 May 2020 | Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, Vol. 61, No. 9Chemoselective Probes Serving as Promising Derivatization Tools in Targeted Metabolomics Research23 April 2020 | Journal of Analysis and Testing, Vol. 4, No. 3Quantitative profiling of eicosanoids derived from n-6 and n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids by twin derivatization strategy combined with LC-MS/MS in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitusAnalytica Chimica Acta, Vol. 1120 Vol. 10, No. 15 Follow us on social media for the latest updates Metrics History Received 9 May 2018 Accepted 11 June 2018 Published online 23 July 2018 Published in print August 2018 Information© 2018 Newlands PressKeywordsabsolute quantificationhigh coverageLC–MSmetabolomicstwins derivatizationFinancial & competing interests disclosureThe authors have no relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript. This includes employment, consultancies, honoraria, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, grants or patents received or pending, or royalties.No writing assistance was utilized in the production of this manuscript.PDF download

Progress and Challenges in Quantifying Carbonyl-Metabolomic Phenomes with LC-MS/MS

Development of High-Performance Chemical Isotope Labeling LC-MS for Profiling the Carbonyl Submetabolome.

Chemical derivatization in LC-MS-based metabolomics study

High Tolerance to Instrument Drifts by Differential Chemical Isotope Labeling LC-MS: A Case Study of the Effect of LC Leak in Long-Term Sample Runs on Quantitative Metabolome Analysis.

Simultaneous 3-Nitrophenylhydrazine Derivatization Strategy of Carbonyl, Carboxyl and Phosphoryl Submetabolome for LC-MS/MS-Based Targeted Metabolomics with Improved Sensitivity and Coverage.

Integration of Chemical Derivatization and in-Source Fragmentation Mass Spectrometry for High-Coverage Profiling of Submetabolomes

Strategies for Large-Scale Targeted Metabolomics Quantification by Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry

Chemical Isotope Labeling LC-MS for Metabolomics.

An Extendable All-in-one Injection Twin Derivatization LC-MS/MS Strategy for the Absolute Quantification of Multiple Chemical-Group-based Submetabolomes.

Development of a Data-Independent Targeted Metabolomics Method for Relative Quantification Using Liquid Chromatography Coupled with Tandem Mass Spectrometry.

Overcoming Sample Matrix Effect in Quantitative Blood Metabolomics Using Chemical Isotope Labeling Liquid Chromatography Mass Spectrometry.

Chemical Isotope Labeling LC-MS for High Coverage and Quantitative Profiling of the Hydroxyl Submetabolome in Metabolomics.

Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometric Multiple Reaction Monitoring-Based Strategies for Expanding Targeted Profiling Towards Quantitative Metabolomics.

Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometric Multiple Reaction Monitoring-Based Strategies For Expanding Targeted Profiling Towards Quantitative Metabolomics

High Throughput and Quantitative Measurement of Microbial Metabolome by Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry Using Automated Alkyl Chloroformate Derivatization.

Chemical Derivatization-Based LC-MS for Metabolomics: Advantages and Challenges.

Recent Development in Liquid Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry and Emerging Technologies for Metabolite Identification

Stable isotope coded derivatizing reagents as internal standards in metabolite profiling

Derivatization for Liquid Chromatography-Electrospray Ionization-Mass Spectrometry Analysis of Small-Molecular Weight Compounds

Twins Derivatization-Based LC–MS: a Promising Quantitative Tool for Metabolomic Analysis

Development of data-independent acquisition workflows for metabolomic analysis on a quadrupole-orbitrap platform