Towards a Mixed Human–machine Creativity

Mirko Farina,Witold Pedrycz,Andrea Lavazza
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41809-024-00146-6
2024-01-01
Journal of Cultural Cognitive Science
Abstract:Creative practices shaped much of human history. Only recently, however; creativity has become the object of scientific study. The advent of generative models (such as LLMs) trained with machine learning techniques promises to automate many creative processes. One may therefore wonder what kind of creativity (combinatorial, exploratory, or transformational) is being mimicked by such models. Pessimists typically view LLMs as ‘stochastic parrots’, i.e., systems that are structurally conditioned by their associationist architectures and are unable to propose new, creative contents or solutions. Optimists, often hyping the data, claim that such models are on the cusp of achieving cognitive transformations that could give them the capacity for autonomous (and thus creative) action. In this contribution, we develop a middle ground position between these two extremes and present a proposal that purports to show that continuous bio-artificial partnerships between the human and the machine can trigger sophisticated (transformational) forms of creativity (which the human on her own couldn’t necessary achieve), thus suggesting that these systems are not mere stochastic parrots. Nevertheless, we do not endorse dubious scientific claims concerning sentiency or superhuman intelligence of LLMs. Thus, contra those who tend to hype the data, we maintain that any ground-breaking findings are bound to be achieved through the proactive collaboration between a human and the machine. To corroborate our proposal, we discuss three case studies (involving text reconstruction/attribution, semantic understanding, and organoid intelligence).
What problem does this paper attempt to address?