Abstract:Systems based on machine learning may exhibit discriminatory behavior based on sensitive characteristics such as gender, sex, religion, or race. In light of this, various notions of fairness and methods to quantify discrimination were proposed, leading to the development of numerous approaches for constructing fair predictors. At the same time, imposing fairness constraints may decrease the utility of the decision-maker, highlighting a tension between fairness and utility. This tension is also recognized in legal frameworks, for instance in the disparate impact doctrine of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 -- in which specific attention is given to considerations of business necessity -- possibly allowing the usage of proxy variables associated with the sensitive attribute in case a high-enough utility cannot be achieved without them. In this work, we analyze the tension between fairness and accuracy from a causal lens for the first time. We introduce the notion of a path-specific excess loss (PSEL) that captures how much the predictor's loss increases when a causal fairness constraint is enforced. We then show that the total excess loss (TEL), defined as the difference between the loss of predictor fair along all causal pathways vs. an unconstrained predictor, can be decomposed into a sum of more local PSELs. At the same time, enforcing a causal constraint often reduces the disparity between demographic groups. Thus, we introduce a quantity that summarizes the fairness-utility trade-off, called the causal fairness/utility ratio, defined as the ratio of the reduction in discrimination vs. the excess loss from constraining a causal pathway. This quantity is suitable for comparing the fairness-utility trade-off across causal pathways. Finally, as our approach requires causally-constrained fair predictors, we introduce a new neural approach for causally-constrained fair learning.

Exploring Latent Discrimination Through an Object-Relational Causal Inference Method

Multi-cause Discrimination Analysis Using Potential Outcomes.

A causal framework for discovering and removing direct and indirect discrimination

Counterfactual Fairness through Transforming Data Orthogonal to Bias

Disentangled Latent Representation Learning for Tackling the Confounding M-Bias Problem in Causal Inference

Local Causal Discovery for Structural Evidence of Direct Discrimination

Causal Discovery for Fairness

On Discrimination Discovery and Removal in Ranked Data using Causal Graph

Towards counterfactual fairness thorough auxiliary variables

Causal Discovery and Causal Inference Based Counterfactual Fairness in Machine Learning

Practical Guide for Causal Pathways and Sub-group Disparity Analysis

Causal Inference with Latent Variables: Recent Advances and Future Prospectives

BaBE: Enhancing Fairness via Estimation of Latent Explaining Variables

Explaining Algorithmic Fairness Through Fairness-Aware Causal Path Decomposition

When Causality Meets Fairness: A Survey

A Causal Framework for Observational Studies of Discrimination

OCDB: Revisiting Causal Discovery with a Comprehensive Benchmark and Evaluation Framework

Hierarchical Bias-Driven Stratification for Interpretable Causal Effect Estimation

Fairness-Accuracy Trade-Offs: A Causal Perspective

Differentiable Causal Discovery For Latent Hierarchical Causal Models

Causal Discovery for Linear Mixed Data