Dietary and Circulating BCAAs Are Unfavorably Associated with Body Fat Measures among Chinese Adults

Yaozong Zhang,Songxian Rao,Xiaoyu Zhang,Zhaohong Peng,Wen Song,Shaoyu Xie,Hongjuan Cao,Zhuang Zhang,Wanshui Yang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nutres.2024.06.009
IF: 3.876
2024-01-01
Nutrition Research
Abstract:Animal studies showed a detrimental effect of dietary branched chain amino acids (BCAAs) on metabolic health, while epidemiological evidence on dietary BCAAs and obesity is limited and inconclusive. We hypothesized that high dietary and circulating BCAAs are unfavorably associated with obesity in community-dwelling adults. We evaluated the 1-year longitudinal associations of dietary BCAA intake and circulating BCAAs with body fat measures. Body weight, height, and circumferences of the waist (WC) and hip (HC) were measured at baseline and again after 1-year. Body composition and liver fat [indicated by controlled attenuation parameter (CAP)] were also assessed after 1-year. Serum BCAA concentrations at baseline was quantified by liquid chromatography mass spectrometry. Diet was collected using 4 quarterly 3-day recalls during the 1-year. The correlation coefficients between dietary and serum BCAAs were 0.12 (P=0.035) for total dietary BCAAs, and ranged from -0.02 (soy foods, P=0.749) to 0.18 (poultry, P=0.001). Total dietary BCAA intake was associated with increase in body weight (β=0.044, P=0.022) and body mass index (BMI, β=0.047, P=0.043). BCAAs from animal foods were associated with increase in HC, while BCAAs from soy foods were associated with weight gain and higher CAP (all P<0.05). Serum BCAAs were associated with higher WC, HC, BMI, body fat mass, visceral fat level, and CAP (all P<0.05). These results support that dietary and circulating BCAAs are positively associated with the risk of obesity. More cohort studies with validated dietary assessment tools and long-term follow-up among diverse populations are needed to confirm our findings.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?