Comparing the Performance of Rolled Steel and 3D-Printed 316L Stainless Steel

Yao-Tsung Lin,Ming-Yi Tsai,Shih-Yu Yen,Guan-Hua Lung,Jin-Ting Yei,Kuo-Jen Hsu,Kai-Jung Chen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/mi15030353
IF: 3.4
2024-03-01
Micromachines
Abstract:Three-dimensional printing is a non-conventional additive manufacturing process. It is different from the conventional subtractive manufacturing process. It offers exceptional rapid prototyping capabilities and results that conventional subtractive manufacturing methods cannot attain, especially in applications involving curved or intricately shaped components. Despite its advantages, metal 3D printing will face porosity, warpage, and surface roughness issues. These issues will affect the future practical application of the parts indirectly, for example, by affecting the structural strength and the parts' assembly capability. Therefore, this study compares the qualities of the warpage, weight, and surface roughness after milling and grinding processes for the same material (316L stainless steel) between rolled steel and 3D-printed steel. The experimental results show that 3D-printed parts are approximately 13% to 14% lighter than rolled steel. The surface roughness performance of 3D-printed steel is better than that of rolled steel for the same material after milling or grinding processing. The hardness of the 3D-printed steel is better than that of the rolled steel. This research verifies that 3D additive manufacturing can use surface processing to optimize surface performance and achieve the functions of lightness and hardness.
chemistry, analytical,nanoscience & nanotechnology,instruments & instrumentation,physics, applied
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
### Problems Addressed by the Paper The paper primarily explores the differences in performance between 3D printed 316L stainless steel and traditionally rolled steel, particularly in terms of surface roughness, weight, and hardness. The main objective of the study is to verify whether 3D printing technology can optimize material performance through surface treatment, achieving lightweight and high hardness effects. Specifically, the paper addresses the following aspects: 1. **Surface Roughness**: Comparing the surface roughness of 3D printed steel and traditionally rolled steel after grinding and milling processes. 2. **Weight Difference**: The study found that 3D printed parts are approximately 13% to 14% lighter than rolled steel. 3. **Hardness Comparison**: Verifying whether the hardness of 3D printed steel is superior to that of traditionally rolled steel. 4. **Deformation and Warping**: Analyzing the impact of support structures on part deformation and warping during the 3D printing process. 5. **Porosity Analysis**: Investigating the effect of porosity on the weight and structural strength of parts during the 3D printing process. Through these experiments, the paper aims to demonstrate the advantages of 3D printing technology in the manufacturing of metal parts and explore its feasibility in practical applications.