Treatment Outcomes among Patients with a Positive Candida Culture Close to Randomization Receiving Rezafungin or Caspofungin in the ReSTORE Study.

Alex Soriano,Patrick M. Honore,Oliver A. Cornely,Methee Chayakulkeeree,Matteo Bassetti,Huang Haihui,Herve Dupont,Young Keun Kim,Marin Kollef,Bart Jan Kullberg,Nick Manamley,Peter Pappas,John Pullman,Taylor Sandison,Cecilia Dignani,Jose A. Vazquez,George R. Thompson III
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciae363
IF: 20.999
2024-01-01
Clinical Infectious Diseases
Abstract:Background Rezafungin, a novel, once-weekly echinocandin for the treatment of candidemia and/or invasive candidiasis (IC) was noninferior to caspofungin for day 30 all-cause mortality (ACM) and day 14 global cure in the phase 3 ReSTORE trial (NCT03667690). We conducted preplanned subgroup analyses for patients with a positive culture close to randomization in ReSTORE.Methods ReSTORE was a multicenter, double-blind, double-dummy, randomized trial in patients aged >= 18 years with candidemia and/or IC treated with once-weekly intravenous rezafungin (400 mg/200 mg) or once-daily intravenous caspofungin (70 mg/50 mg). This analysis comprised patients with a positive blood culture drawn between 12 hours before and 72 hours after randomization or a positive culture from another normally sterile site sampled between 48 hours before and 72 hours after randomization. Efficacy endpoints included day 30 ACM, day 14 global cure rate, and day 5 and 14 mycological response. Adverse events were evaluated.Results This analysis included 38 patients randomized to rezafungin and 46 to caspofungin. In the rezafungin and caspofungin groups, respectively, day 30 ACM was 26.3% and 21.7% (between-group difference [95% confidence interval], 4.6% [-13.7%, 23.5%]), day 14 global response was 55.3% and 50.0% (between-group difference, 5.3% [-16.1%, 26.0%]), and day 5 mycological eradication was 71.1% and 50.0% (between-group difference, 21.1% [-0.2%, 40.2%]). Safety was comparable between treatments.Conclusions These findings support the efficacy and safety of rezafungin compared with caspofungin for the treatment of candidemia and/or IC in patients with a positive culture close to randomization, with potential early treatment benefits for rezafungin. This preplanned subgroup analysis of the ReSTORE trial supports rezafungin efficacy and safety versus caspofungin for the treatment of candidemia and/or invasive candidiasis in patients with a positive culture close to randomization, who may represent patients with more serious infections. Graphical Abstract
What problem does this paper attempt to address?