Abstract:Kinase inhibitors are widely used in antitumor research, but there are still many problems such as drug resistance and off-target toxicity. A more suitable solution is to design a multitarget inhibitor with certain selectivity. Herein, computational and experimental studies were applied to the discovery of dual inhibitors against FGFR4 and EGFR. A quantitative structure–property relationship (QSPR) study was carried out to predict the FGFR4 and EGFR activity of a data set consisting of 843 and 5088 compounds, respectively. Four different machine learning methods including support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF), gradient boost regression tree (GBRT), and XGBoost (XGB) were built using the most suitable features selected by the mutual information algorithm. As for FGFR4 and EGFR, SVM showed the best performance with R2test-FGFR4 = 0.80 and R2test-EGFR = 0.75, demonstrating excellent model stability, which was used to predict the activity of some compounds from an in-house database. Finally, compound 1 was selected, which exhibits inhibitory activity against FGFR4 (IC50 = 86.2 nM) and EGFR (IC50 = 83.9 nM) kinase, respectively. Furthermore, molecular docking and molecular dynamics simulations were performed to identify key amino acids for the interaction of compound 1 with FGFR4 and EGFR. In this paper, the machine-learning-based QSAR models were established and effectively applied to the discovery of dual-target inhibitors against FGFR4 and EGFR, demonstrating the great potential of machine learning strategies in dual inhibitor discovery.The Supporting Information is available free of charge at <a class="ext-link" href="/doi/10.1021/acs.jcim.0c00652?goto=supporting-info">https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jcim.0c00652</a>.Supporting Methods: Y-randomization test (p 2). Supporting Figures: Figure S1. The relationship between Q2 and the number of descriptors for FGFR4. Figure S2. Distribution of Q2 of randomized models compared with the true model in the Y-randomization test. Figure S3. Correlograms between each important descriptor and permeability values of two activity prediction modeling: (a) FGFR4, (b) EGFR. Figure S4. Comparison of the molecular similarity between the training set and the external set: (a) FGFR4 data set, (b) EGFR data set. Figure S5. Structures of compounds 1–3. Figures S6 and S7. The chemical structures of modeling molecules of the FGFR4/EGFR activity prediction model. Figure S8. The chemical structures of 23 compounds external verification set. Figure S9. Docking results of FGFR4 and EGFR. (<a class="ext-link" href="/doi/suppl/10.1021/acs.jcim.0c00652/suppl_file/ci0c00652_si_001.pdf">PDF</a>)Table S1. Experimental and predicted IC50 values of FGFR4 of the whole data set that consisted of 843 compounds. Table S2. Experimental and predicted IC50 values of EGFR of the whole data set that consisted of 5088 compounds. Table S3. Detailed information for the external validation set. Table S4. Statistical analysis of 180 descriptors selected in FGFR4 activity prediction. Table S5. Statistical analysis of 280 descriptors selected in EGFR activity prediction. Table S6. Detailed information on the most essential variables for FGFR4 prediction activity modeling. Table S7. Detailed information on the most essential variables for EGFR prediction activity modeling. Table S8. The original data for cross-docking of FGFR4 and EGFR. Table S9. Residue-specific binding free energies of FGFR4 (PDB code: <a href="https://www.rcsb.org/pdb/search/structidSearch.do?structureId=4UXQ">4UXQ</a>) and compound 1. Table S10. Residue-specific binding free energies of EGFR (PDB code: <a href="https://www.rcsb.org/pdb/search/structidSearch.do?structureId=4ZAU">4ZAU</a>) and compound 1. (<a class="ext-link" href="/doi/suppl/10.1021/acs.jcim.0c00652/suppl_file/ci0c00652_si_002.xlsx">XLSX</a>)This article has not yet been cited by other publications.

Discovery of VEGFR-2 Inhibitors employing Junction Tree Variational Encoder with Local Latent Space Bayesian Optimization and Gradient Ascent Exploration

Discovery of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor 2 Inhibitors Employing Junction Tree Variational Autoencoder with Bayesian Optimization and Gradient Ascent

Discovery of VEGFR2 inhibitors by integrating naïve Bayesian classification, molecular docking and drug screening approaches

3D physiologically-informed deep learning for drug discovery of a novel vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 (VEGFR2)

Identification of Novel Potential VEGFR-2 Inhibitors Using a Combination of Computational Methods for Drug Discovery

QSAR analysis of VEGFR-2 inhibitors based on machine learning, Topomer CoMFA and molecule docking

From deep learning to the discovery of promising VEGFR‐2 inhibitors

Quantitative structure activity relationship and molecular simulations for the exploration of natural potent VEGFR-2 inhibitors: an in silico anti-angiogenic study

Discovery of Novel VEGFR-2 Inhibitors. Part 5: Exploration of Diverse Hinge-Binding Fragments Via Core-Refining Approach

Bayesian Optimization in the Latent Space of a Variational Autoencoder for the Generation of Selective FLT3 Inhibitors

The Discovery of Novel Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinases Inhibitors: Pharmacophore Modeling, Virtual Screening and Docking Studies

Discovery of Novel Anti-Angiogenesis Agents. Part 7: Multitarget Inhibitors of VEGFR-2, TIE-2 and EphB4.

Molecular docking aided machine learning for the identification of potential VEGFR inhibitors against renal cell carcinoma

3D-QSAR and Docking Study on 3-Benzimidazol-2-ylhydroquinolin-2-one Derivatives As VEGFR-2 Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors

New Application of Novel Tetrazine Derivatives As Potent VEGFR-2 Kinase Inhibitors and Anti-Cancer Agents

Discovery of novel dual VEGFR2 and Src inhibitors using a multistep virtual screening approach

Discovery of new potential CDK2/VEGFR2 type II inhibitors by fragmentation and virtual screening of natural products

Discovery of Novel Anti-Angiogenesis Agents. Part 9: Multiplex Inhibitors Suppressing Compensatory Activations of RTKs

Discovery of Dual FGFR4 and EGFR Inhibitors by Machine Learning and Biological Evaluation

Comprehensive structural and functional analysis of hVEGFR1: Insights into phosphorylation, molecular interactions, and potential inhibitors through docking and dynamics simulations

Discovery of Novel Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) Inhibitors Using Computational Approaches