Options to Enhance China’s National Emission Trading System Design for Carbon Neutrality

Hongyu Zhang,Heng Liang,Da Zhang,Junling Huang,Xiliang Zhang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2024.2375586
2024-01-01
Climate Policy
Abstract:To better align the emissions trajectory of China's power sector with the country's neutrality target for 2060, China's national Emission Trading System (ETS) needs to be enhanced. This study uses a power system planning model that incorporates an output-based ETS module to explore the effects of three enhanced ETS options: 1) tightening the benchmark faster, 2) introducing auctions, and 3) transitioning to a cap-and-trade ETS. A cap-and-trade ETS can achieve deep decarbonization at the lowest cost by encouraging cheap renewables. With an increased benchmark stringency under free allocation and output-based ETS, the power sector can achieve the same level of emission reduction at a 5.2% higher cost compared to a cap-and-trade ETS. This is due to the extensive development of carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS) technology, facilitated by the free allowance allocation of the output-based ETS. Introducing auctions into an output-based ETS would encourage both renewables and CCUS and increase the cost by 1.4% compared to the cap-and-trade ETS. First, we suggest that auctioning be introduced into an output-based ETS to cost-effectively encourage a diversified power supply. Subsequently, we recommend turning to a cap-and-trade ETS after 2030 to reduce the cost of decarbonization. The same emission trajectory can be achieved with different technology mixes using different ETS designs.Output-based ETS with free allowance allocation leads to high decarbonization costs with large CCUS utilization.Introducing auctions into an output-based ETS can reduce emissions with a limited increase in cost and lead to a more diversified technology mix.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?