Abstract:Low-cost optical sensors are used in many countries to monitor fine particulate (PM2.5) air pollution, especially in cities and towns with large spatial and temporal variation due to woodsmoke pollution. Previous peer-reviewed research derived calibration equations for PurpleAir (PA) sensors by co-locating PA units at a government regulatory air pollution monitoring site in Armidale, NSW, Australia, a town where woodsmoke is the main source of PM2.5 pollution. The calibrations enabled the PA sensors to provide accurate estimates of PM2.5 that were almost identical to those from the NSW Government reference equipment and allowed the high levels of wintertime PM2.5 pollution and the substantial spatial and temporal variation from wood heaters to be quantified, as well as the estimated costs of premature mortality exceeding $10,000 per wood heater per year. This follow-up study evaluates eight PA sensors co-located at the same government site to check their accuracy over the following four years, using either the original calibrations, the default woodsmoke equation on the PA website for uncalibrated sensors, or the ALT-34 conversion equation (see text). Minimal calibration drift was observed, with year-round correlations, r = 0.98 ± 0.01, and root mean square error (RMSE) = 2.0 μg/m3 for daily average PA PM2.5 vs. reference equipment. The utitilty of the PA sensors without prior calibration at locations affected by woodsmoke was also demonstrated by the year-round correlations of 0.94 and low RMSE between PA (woodsmoke and ALT-34 conversions) and reference PM2.5 at the NSW Government monitoring sites in Orange and Gunnedah. To ensure the reliability of the PA data, basic quality checks are recommended, including the agreement of the two laser sensors in each PA unit and removing any transient spikes affecting only one sensor. In Armidale, from 2019 to 2022, the continuing high spatial variation in the PM2.5 levels observed during the colder months was many times higher than any discrepancies between the PA and reference measurements. Particularly unhealthy PM2.5 levels were noted in southern and eastern central Armidale. The measurements inside two older weatherboard houses in Armidale showed that high outdoor pollution resulted in high pollution inside the houses within 1-2 h. Daily average PM2.5 concentrations available on the PA website allow air pollution at different sites across regions (and countries) to be compared. Such comparisons revealed major elevations in PA PM2.5 at Gunnedah, Orange, Monash (Australian Capital Territory), and Christchurch (New Zealand) during the wood heating season. The data for Gunnedah and Muswellbrook suggest a slight underestimation of PM2.5 at other times of the year when there are proportionately more dust and other larger particles. A network of appropriately calibrated PA sensors can provide valuable information on the spatial and temporal variation in the air pollution that can be used to identify pollution hotspots, improve estimates of population exposure and health costs, and inform public policy.

Response of Low-Cost Sensors to High PM 2.5 Concentrations During Bushfire and Haze Events

Low-cost sensors as an alternative for long-term air quality monitoring

Field Evaluation of Low-Cost Particulate Matter Sensors in Beijing.

Low-cost PM2.5 Sensors: an Assessment of Their Suitability for Various Applications

Low-cost PM2.5 sensors can help identify driving factors of poor air quality and benefit communities

Suitability of Low-Cost PM2.5 Sensors for Monitoring Ambient Concentrations

Feasibility of low-cost particulate matter sensors for long-term environmental monitoring: Field evaluation and calibration

Evaluation of the Performance of Low-Cost Air Quality Sensors at a High Mountain Station with Complex Meteorological Conditions

Performance of a Low-Cost Sensor (LCS) Network for Long-Term Indoor and Outdoor PM2.5 Measurements at Rural Communities in Beijing, China

Design and evaluation of a portable PM2.5 monitor featuring a low-cost sensor in line with an active filter sampler

Network of Low-cost Air Quality Sensor for Monitoring Indoor, Outdoor, and Personal PM2.5 Exposure in Seattle during the 2020 Wildfire Season

Characterising Low-Cost Sensors in Highly Portable Platforms to Quantify Personal Exposure in Diverse Environments

Stationary and portable multipollutant monitors for high-spatiotemporal-resolution air quality studies including online calibration

Integrating low-cost air quality sensor networks with fixed and satellite monitoring systems to study ground-level PM2.5

Using Low-cost Sensors to Quantify the Effects of Air Filtration on Indoor and Personal Exposure Relevant PM2.5 Concentrations in Beijing, China

Applications of Low-Cost Sensing Technologies for Air Quality Monitoring and Exposure Assessment: How Far Have They Gone?

Evaluation of a new low-cost particle sensor as an internet-of-things device for outdoor air quality monitoring

Comparative Study on the Use of Some Low-Cost Optical Particulate Sensors for Rapid Assessment of Local Air Quality Changes

Five Years of Accurate PM2.5 Measurements Demonstrate the Value of Low-Cost PurpleAir Monitors in Areas Affected by Woodsmoke

Evaluating the Feasibility of a Personal Particle Exposure Monitor in Outdoor and Indoor Microenvironments in Shanghai, China.

Using Low-Cost Sensors to Monitor Indoor, Outdoor, and Personal Ozone Concentrations in Beijing, China.