Impact of different categories of intermediate risk factors on the recurrence of papillary thyroid carcinoma: a retrospective cohort study.

Qiang Chen,Xiuhe Zou,Feng Liu,Anping Su,Yong Jiang,Tao Wei,Rixiang Gong,Jingqiang Zhu,Zhihui Li
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000001945
2024-01-01
Abstract:BACKGROUND:Data regarding the long-term recurrence in patients with intermediate-risk papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) are limited. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of primary tumor-related risk factors and lymph node (LN)-only risk factors on recurrence-free survival (RFS) in patients with intermediate-risk PTC. MATERIALS AND METHODS:Patients with PTC who received initial treatment at our institution between 2010 and 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. A total of 799 intermediate-risk PTC patients were included and further categorized into subgroups according to the different categories of intermediate risk factors. The RFS rates of these subgroups were investigated and compared. RESULTS:Structural recurrence developed in 11 patients (1.4%) of the whole cohort during a median follow-up duration of 96 months. There were no significant differences in RFS between the primary tumor-only risk group and the LN-only risk group, while the combined group of primary tumor risk factors and LN risk factor (metastatic LNs >5) was associated with a worse RFS rate. In the matched-pair analysis, no significant difference in RFS was found between patients who underwent thyroid lobectomy (TL) and those who underwent total thyroidectomy (TT) (6-year RFS: 99.6% vs. 98.8%, P = 0.316) during a median follow-up duration of 100 months. CONCLUSIONS:Intermediate-risk PTC patients who underwent TL had a comparable RFS to those who underwent TT. The combination of primary tumor risk factors and LN risk factor (metastatic LNs >5) may be a useful tool for predicting the risk of long-term structural recurrence in patients with intermediate-risk PTC.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?