The 45° and 60° of Sagittal Femoral Tunnel Placement in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Provide Similar Knee Stability

Rongshan Cheng,Gai Yao,Dimitris Dimitriou,Ziang Jiang,Yangyang Yang,Tsung-Yuan Tsai
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ksa.12341
2024-01-01
Abstract:PurposeThe aim of the present study was to compare 45 degrees and 60 degrees of sagittal femoral tunnel angles in terms of anterior tibial translation (ATT), valgus angle and graft in situ force following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). MethodsTen porcine knees were subjected to the following loading conditions: (1) 89 N anterior tibial load at 35 degrees (full extension), 60 degrees and 90 degrees of knee flexion and (2) 5 N m valgus tibial moment at 35 degrees and 45 degrees of knee flexion. ATT and graft in situ force of the intact anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and ACLR were collected using a robotic universal force/moment sensor (UFS) testing system for (1) ACL intact, (2) ACL-deficient (ACLD) and (3) two different ACLR using different sagittal femoral tunnel angles (coronal 45 degrees/sagittal 45 degrees and coronal 45 degrees/sagittal 60 degrees). ResultsDuring the anterior tibial load, the femoral tunnel angle of ACLR knees at coronal 45 degrees/sagittal 45 degrees and 60 degrees had significantly higher ATT than that of the ACL-intact knees at 60 degrees of knee flexion (p < 0.05). The femoral tunnel angle of ACLR knees at coronal 45 degrees/sagittal 60 degrees had significantly lower graft in situ force than that of the ACL-intact knees at 60 degrees and 90 degrees of knee flexion (p < 0.05). During the valgus tibial moment, the femoral tunnel angle of ACLR knees at coronal 45 degrees/sagittal 45 degrees and 60 degrees had significantly lower graft in situ force than that of the ACL-intact knees at all knee flexions (p < 0.05). ConclusionsThe femoral tunnel angle of ACLR knees at coronal 45 degrees/sagittal 45 degrees provided similar ATT, valgus angle and graft in situ force to that of ACLR knees at coronal 45 degrees/sagittal 60 degrees. Therefore, both femoral tunnel angles could be used in ACLR, as the sagittal femoral tunnel angle does not appear to be relevant in post-operative knee stability. Level of EvidenceNot applicable.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?