Abstract:Abstract Growth factors regulate cell fates, including their proliferation, differentiation, survival, and death, according to the cell type. Even when the response to a specific growth factor is deterministic for collective cell behavior, significant levels of fluctuation are often observed between single cells. Statistical analyses of single-cell responses provide insights into the mechanism of cell fate decisions but very little is known about the distributions of the internal states of cells responding to growth factors. Using multi-color immunofluorescent staining, we have here detected the phosphorylation of seven elements in the early response of the ERBB–RAS–MAPK system to two growth factors. Among these seven elements, five were analyzed simultaneously in distinct combinations in the same single cells. Although principle component analysis suggested cell-type and input specific phosphorylation patterns, cell-to-cell fluctuation was large. Mutual information analysis suggested that cells use multitrack (bush-like) signal transduction pathways under conditions in which clear cell fate changes have been reported. The clustering of single-cell response patterns indicated that the fate change in a cell population correlates with the large entropy of the response, suggesting a bet-hedging strategy is used in decision making. A comparison of true and randomized datasets further indicated that this large variation is not produced by simple reaction noise, but is defined by the properties of the signal-processing network. Author Summary How extracellular signals, such as growth factors (GFs), induce fate changes in biological cells is still not fully understood. Some GFs induce cell proliferation and others induce differentiation by stimulating a common reaction network. Although the response to each GF is reproducible for a cell population, not all single cells respond similarly. The question that arises is whether a certain GF conducts all the responding cells in the same direction during a fate change, or if it initially stimulates a variety of behaviors among single cells, from which the cells that move in the appropriate direction are later selected. Our current statistical analysis of single-cell responses suggests that the latter process, which is called a bet-hedging mechanism is plausible. The complex pathways of signal transmission seem to be responsible for this bet-hedging.

Mitogen Signaling Strength and Duration Can Control Cell Cycle Decisions

Major Physiological Signaling Pathways in the Regulation of Cell Proliferation and Survival

Molecular competition in G1 controls when cells simultaneously commit to terminally differentiate and exit the cell-cycle

Getting to S: CDK functions and targets on the path to cell-cycle commitment

Linking the Cell Cycle to Cell Fate Decisions

Novel insights into cell cycle regulation of cell fate determination

Cell Cycle Progression Mechanisms: Slower Cyclin-D/cdk4 Activation and Faster Cyclin-E/cdk2.

Competing memories of mitogen and p53 signalling control cell-cycle entry

Cell-to-cell diversification in ERBB-RAS-MAPK signal transduction that produces cell-type specific growth factor responses

Reliable Cell Cycle Commitment in Budding Yeast is Ensured by Signal Integration

Landscape and Flux Reveal a New Global View and Physical Quantification of Mammalian Cell Cycle.

A comprehensive model for the proliferation–quiescence decision in response to endogenous DNA damage in human cells

Slower CDK4 and faster CDK2 activation in the cell cycle

Cell Fate Decision by an Adaptable Molecular Timer of P53

An intermediate Rb–E2F activity state safeguards proliferation commitment

A mechanism for cell-cycle regulation of MAP kinase signaling in a yeast differentiation pathway

The oscillation of mitotic kinase governs cell cycle latches in mammalian cells

Non-epigenetic Mechanisms Enable Short Memories of the Environment for Cell Cycle Commitment

Quantifying the Landscape and Transition Paths for Proliferation-Quiescence Fate Decisions

The balance between cell cycle arrest and cell proliferation: control by the extracellular matrix and by contact inhibition

P53 Dynamics Orchestrates with Binding Affinity to Target Genes for Cell Fate Decision