Abstract:There is a significant gap in Computing Education Research (CER) concerning the impact of Large Language Models (LLMs) in advanced stages of degree programmes. This study aims to address this gap by investigating the effectiveness of LLMs in answering exam questions within an applied machine learning final-year undergraduate course. The research examines the performance of LLMs in responding to a range of exam questions, including proctored closed-book and open-book questions spanning various levels of Bloom’s Taxonomy. Question formats encompassed open-ended, tabular data-based, and figure-based inquiries. To achieve this aim, the study has the following objectives: Comparative Analysis: To compare LLM-generated exam answers with actual student submissions to assess LLM performance. Detector Evaluation: To evaluate the efficacy of LLM detectors by directly inputting LLM-generated responses into these detectors. Additionally, assess detector performance on tampered LLM outputs designed to conceal their AI-generated origin. The research methodology used for this paper incorporates a staff-student partnership model involving eight academic staff and six students. Students play integral roles in shaping the project’s direction, particularly in areas unfamiliar to academic staff, such as specific tools to avoid LLM detection. This study contributes to the understanding of LLMs' role in advanced education settings, with implications for future curriculum design and assessment methodologies. Existe un importante vacío en la Investigación de Educación en Computación (CER) sobre el impacto de Modelos de Lenguaje de Gran Escala (LLM) en etapas avanzadas de estudios de grado. Este artículo trata de cubrir este vacío investigando la efectividad de las LLM respondiendo preguntas de examen de Aprendizaje Automático Aplicado en último curso de Grado. El estudio examina el desempeño de las LLM al responder a una variedad de preguntas de examen, que incluyen modelos de examen diseñados con y sin apuntes, a varios niveles de la Taxonomía de Bloom. Los formatos de pregunta incluyen de respuesta abierta, basadas en tablas, o en figuras. Para conseguir esta meta, este estudio tiene los siguientes objetivos: Análisis Comparativo: Comparar respuestas generadas por LLM y por estudiantes para juzgar el desempeño de las LLM. Evaluación de Detectores: Evaluar la eficacia de diferentes detectores de LLM. Además, juzgar la eficacia de los detectores sobre texto alterado por alumnos con el objetivo de engañar a los detectores. El método investigador de este artículo incorpora una relación entre seis alumnos y ocho profesores. Los estudiantes juegan un rol integral para determinar la dirección del proyecto, en especial en áreas poco conocidas para el profesorado, como el uso de herramientas de detección de LLM. Este estudio contribuye a entender el rol de las LLM en el ámbito de la educación universitaria, con implicaciones para el diseño de futuros curriculums y técnicas de evaluación. NA

LLMs in Open and Closed Book Examinations in a Final Year Applied Machine Learning Course (early Findings)

Machine Vs Machine: Large Language Models (llms) in Applied Machine Learning High-Stakes Open-Book Exams

Developing an Open-Book Online Exam for Final Year Students.

Open-LLM-Leaderboard: From Multi-choice to Open-style Questions for LLMs Evaluation, Benchmark, and Arena

Studying LLM Performance on Closed- and Open-source Data

I don't trust you (anymore)! -- The effect of students' LLM use on Lecturer-Student-Trust in Higher Education

Assessing Hidden Risks of LLMs: An Empirical Study on Robustness, Consistency, and Credibility

Comprehensive Reassessment of Large-Scale Evaluation Outcomes in LLMs: A Multifaceted Statistical Approach

Understanding LLM Development Through Longitudinal Study: Insights from the Open Ko-LLM Leaderboard

Awes, Laws, and Flaws From Today's LLM Research

Can LLMs Grade Short-Answer Reading Comprehension Questions : An Empirical Study with a Novel Dataset

Breaking the Silence: the Threats of Using LLMs in Software Engineering

Limitations of the LLM-as-a-Judge Approach for Evaluating LLM Outputs in Expert Knowledge Tasks

Insights from Social Shaping Theory: The Appropriation of Large Language Models in an Undergraduate Programming Course

"Which LLM should I use?": Evaluating LLMs for tasks performed by Undergraduate Computer Science Students

An Empirical Study on Challenges for LLM Application Developers

"With Great Power Comes Great Responsibility!": Student and Instructor Perspectives on the influence of LLMs on Undergraduate Engineering Education

The Potential of LLMs in Medical Education: Generating Questions and Answers for Qualification Exams

Student Perspectives on Using a Large Language Model (LLM) for an Assignment on Professional Ethics

Legal aspects of generative artificial intelligence and large language models in examinations and theses

Automated Feedback in Math Education: A Comparative Analysis of LLMs for Open-Ended Responses