Figure S5 from Paradoxical Activation of Oncogenic Signaling as a Cancer Treatment Strategy

Matheus Henrique Dias,Anoek Friskes,Siying Wang,Joao M. Fernandes Neto,Frank van Gemert,Soufiane Mourragui,Chrysa Papagianni,Hendrik J. Kuiken,Sara Mainardi,Daniel Alvarez-Villanueva,Cor Lieftink,Ben Morris,Anna Dekker,Emma van Dijk,Lieke H.S. Wilms,Marcelo S. da Silva,Robin A. Jansen,Antonio Mulero-Sánchez,Elke Malzer,August Vidal,Cristina Santos,Ramón Salazar,Rosangela A.M. Wailemann,Thompson E.P. Torres,Giulia De Conti,Jonne A. Raaijmakers,Petur Snaebjornsson,Shengxian Yuan,Wenxin Qin,John S. Kovach,Hugo A. Armelin,Hein te Riele,Alexander van Oudenaarden,Haojie Jin,Roderick L. Beijersbergen,Alberto Villanueva,Rene H. Medema,Rene Bernards
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1158/2159-8290.26134852.v1
2024-01-01
Abstract:Figure S5: Combined toxicity of LB-100 and Adavosertib in PDAC and CCA models (A) and (B) Dose-response assays show the effect of LB-100 or Adavosertib in 4 PDAC and 4 CCA models, respectively. Cell viability was estimated by resazurin fluorescence after 5 days in the presence of the drug or DMSO control. The normalized values are plotted. (C) and (D) Long-term viability assays show 4 PDAC and 4 CCA models, respectively, treated with LB-100 or Adavosertib at the indicated concentrations. Treatments were refreshed every 2-3 days, and the cells were grown for 10-14 days before fixing, staining, and imaging. (E) and (F) IncuCyte-based proliferation assays from 4 PDAC and 4 CCA models, respectively, in the absence or presence of LB-100, Adavosertib, or the combination at the indicated concentrations.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?