Composition-Nanoarchitecture-Performance Analysis of High Energy Density Electrodeposited Silicon for Lithium-Ion Battery Anodes

Nathan J. Fritz,Hyewon Jeong,Beniamin Zahiri,Pengcheng Sun,Gaurav Singhal,Michael A. Caple,Zhenzhen Yang,Jingcheng Ma,Minseok Choi,Akwar A. Obong,Aaron J. Blake,John B. Cook,Nenad Miljkovic,David G. Cahill,Paul V. Braun
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acsaem.4c00941
IF: 6.4
2024-01-01
ACS Applied Energy Materials
Abstract:Electrodeposition of silicon (Si) was previously demonstrated as a promising method for fabricating 3D-structured lithium-ion battery anodes. However, the relationship between the electrochemical performance and chemical composition of the relatively impure electrodeposited silicon is not well understood. Here, we report the electrodeposition of a Si-dominant active material (EDEP-Si) onto 3D-structured nickel (Ni) scaffolds and systematically compare the electrochemical properties, elemental composition, atomistic Si coordination, and molecular structure of EDEP-Si with high-purity amorphous Si grown via static chemical vapor deposition. Despite the considerable amount of carbon (9-11 at %) and oxygen (42-44 at %) present in EDEP-Si, the cycling stability and high reversible specific capacity are remarkably similar to those of CVD-Si on a silicon basis (similar to 2400 mA h/g-Si after 100 cycles). The primary difference is that EDEP-Si exhibits reduced cycling efficiency over the first 10-20 cycles. Reactions between carbon and, more importantly, oxygen in EDEP-Si with lithium are likely responsible for the reduced early cycle performance and lower capacity of the total deposit. Our observations suggest ultrapure Si is not necessary for high electrochemical access to reversible charge storage, although limiting the presence of incorporated impurity species would improve energy density and first cycle efficiency.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?