Inclusive Leadership and Employee Proactive Behavior: A Cross-Level Moderated Mediation Model
Po-Chien Chang,Guangya Ma,Ying-Yin Lin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S363434
IF: 3.974
2022-07-14
Psychology Research and Behavior Management
Abstract:Po-Chien Chang, Guangya Ma, Ying-Yin Lin School of Business, Macau University of Science and Technology, Macau, China Correspondence: Ying-Yin Lin, School of Business, Macau University of Science and Technology, Taipa, Macau, 999078, China, Tel +853 63976801, Email Purpose: The proactive behavior of employees is one of the key determinants of organizational development in a rapidly changing business environment. While much attention has been paid to the antecedents of employees' proactive behavior, little is known about the mechanisms that influence their psychological state and work behavior. The aim of this research is to investigate the relationship between inclusive leadership (IL) and proactive behavior, along with mediating role of employee trust and the moderating role of procedural justice climate. Methods: The data were collected from 40 independent project teams from 30 companies in China, and the hypotheses were tested on 304 available samples, followed by the null model to conduct the cross-level regression analysis. Results: The results indicated that IL significantly affects the employee proactive behavior, in which employee trust played a mediating role. Moreover, procedural justice climate respectively moderates the positive relationship between IL and employee proactive behavior, and the positive relationship between IL and employee trust. Conclusion: IL not only provides emotional support to increase employee trust but also inspires subordinates with a non-active personality to take initiative. Team-oriented organizational structures should promote procedural justice measures to create a trusting and fair work environment that more effectively furthers the effectiveness of IL on positive work behaviors of employees. Keywords: inclusive leadership, proactive behavior, employee trust, procedural justice climate Can inclusiveness of leader fuel employee proactivity and what strategies organizations should develop to boost it? The research investigates the role of inclusive leadership (IL) and organization contextual strategy on employees' proactive behavior. As global competition intensifies, the use of teams has increased dramatically to quickly respond to constantly changing task requirements and emergent technologies. On the one hand, this team-oriented organizational strategy is characterized by dynamic diversification, often consisting of cross-departmental and cross-professional project teams. 1 On the other hand, practically, the diversity and dynamics of a team-oriented organizational structure often weaken the trust and belongings of employees in the workplace, which is not conducive to the full involvement of employees and further damages group processes and outcomes. At this time, companies not only need managers to effectively lead the team, but also urgently improve the proactive behavior of employees 2 to actively implement corporate strategies, enhance sustainable viability, and achieve superior performance. The proactive behavior of employees is obviously a key determinant of organizational development and improving company performance. 3 Therefore, how to motivate employees to take initiative has become a common concern of both academics and practitioners. 4 Based on the model of proactivity proposed by Parker, a large number of scholars have supplemented antecedents and mechanisms of proactive behavior from two aspects- individual differences and contextual factors. 4 First, much of this work has emphasized a proactive personality as an important antecedent for taking the initiative, including motivation and goal generation, 5 desire for control, 6 self-efficacy, 7 learning, knowledge, skills, and abilities. 8,9 Second, other work argues that while positive personality is a crucial predictor of employee proactive behavior at the individual level, contextual factors tend to affect employee behavior more directly in the workplace, such as social environment, 10 support from leaders and organizations, 11 fairness of distribution and procedure. 12,13 Leaders directly or indirectly influence subordinates' active behavior by stimulating their work motivation or influencing the work environment atmosphere. 14 Current research reveals that goal-oriented leadership, such as transformational leadership and empowering leadership, plays a significant role to improve employee's proactive behavior, 15 it is not surprising because the motivational state of such leadership is to set a challenging goal to push subordinates to take initiatives. But practically the diversity and dynamics of team-oriented organizational structure often weaken the trust and belongings of emplo -Abstract Truncated-
psychology, clinical, multidisciplinary