Abstract:Introduction Traditionally, sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has been used to stage the axilla in early breast cancer (EBC) to guide adjuvant treatment recommendations. Following advances in tumor biology understanding, targeted systemic therapies and genomic testing, with increasing de-escalation of axillary surgery, its role may be less critical especially in selected groups of women. Aims Evaluate clinical utility of SLNB in adjuvant treatment recommendations for women ≥ 70 years with EBC. Methods Retrospective cohort study of women ≥ 70 years with cT1-2N0 EBC undergoing primary surgery and SLNB between 01/2017-12/2022 at The Royal Marsden Hospital (RMH), University Hospital Zurich (USZ) and Seoul National University Hospital (SNUH) in the United Kingdom, Switzerland and South Korea respectively. Simple descriptive statistics and non-parametric tests were performed as appropriate. Results A total of 884 patients were included in the analysis, with 584 patients from RMH, 148 from USZ and 152 from SNUH. The median age was 75 (IQR 72-79) years. Most cancers were invasive ductal (82.9%), grade 2 (61.4%), hormone receptor (HR) positive/HER2 negative (82.9%) with a median tumor size of 17 (IQR 4-50) mm. SLNB was positive in 116 (13.1%) patients. Of these 116 patients, 20 (17.2%) had completion ALND; 7/20 had further RT up to levels 3&4 of the axilla. Of these 116 patients, 96 patients (82.8%) avoided ALND; 25/96 had no further treatment, and 71/96 patients had loco-regional axillary RT (8/71 had RT to levels 1&2 and 63/71 had RT up to levels 3&4). As per international guidelines for patients with EBC with 1-2 positive macrometastases on SLNB treated with breast conserving surgery and breast RT, 5/20 could have been spared ALND, and 50/71 axillary RT. Completion ALND was more likely to be performed at SNUH compared to the other 2 units (p< 0.0001). Axillary RT was more likely to be administered at SNUH and less likely at RMH (p< 0.0001). The multidisciplinary team (MDT) recommended adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) in 146 (16.5%) patients and 100 received it. Of those with a positive SLNB (n=116), AC was recommended in 35, and received by 29. Recommendation for AC was significantly associated with younger age (p=0.021), fewer comorbidities (p=0.003), higher tumor grade (p< 0.0001), increased tumor size (p< 0.0001), HR negative status (p< 0.0001), high genomic risk profile (p< 0.0001) and positive SLNB status (p< 0.0001), but not center (p=0.497). A subgroup analysis of 505 patients with cT1N0, HR+/HER2- EBC, representing a more favorable prognosis group, was performed. Here, 52/505 (10.3%) patients had positive SLNB, of whom 11 had no further axillary treatment, 9 underwent ALND and 32 axillary RT, where 4/9 could have been spared ALND and 28/32 axillary RT as per international guidelines mentioned above. AC was recommended in 26/505 (5.15%) women and 23 received it. AC was not recommended in 39/52 (75%) cases, despite a positive SLNB. MDT recommendation for AC was associated with grade 3 (p< 0.0001), multifocal disease (p=0.021), positive SLNB status (p< 0.0001), high genomic risk profile (p< 0.0001), lower age (p=0.044), fewer co-morbidities (p=0.001) and center (p=0.007) with SNUH being more likely than the other 2, but not ethnicity (p=0.130); AC receipt was associated with the same factors except age (p=0.347). Conclusions Real-world data demonstrates axillary overtreatment despite evidence of the safety of de-escalation of axillary management in EBC. Only a small proportion of women ≥ 70 years with EBC had positive SLNB that may influence adjuvant treatment recommendations, especially with favorable prognosis tumors. In such cases, where clinical morbidity and financial burden of SLNB may outweigh the benefits, a nuanced discussion for opting in SLNB rather than routine performance should be considered. Citation Format: Radhika Merh, Denise Vorburger, Ji-Jung Jung, Han-Byoel Lee, Marios Tasoulis. Clinical utility of sentinel lymph node biopsy in women ≥ 70 years with early breast cancer – an international, retrospective multi-center cohort study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl) nr PO5-23-04.

Is routine axillary staging still required in clinically node negative early breast cancer in women over 74 years?

Incidence and Risk Factors of Lymph Node Metastasis in Breast Cancer Patients Without Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy and Neoadjuvant Therapy: Analysis of SEER Data.

High Risk For Non-Sentinel Node Metastasis In Breast Cancer Patients With Sentinel Node Metastases

Does sentinel lymph node biopsy influence subsequent management decisions in women with breast cancer ≥70 years old?

Abstract PO5-23-04: Clinical utility of sentinel lymph node biopsy in women ≥ 70 years with early breast cancer – an international, retrospective multi-center cohort study

Impact of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy on Management of Older Women With Clinically Node-Negative, Early-Stage, ER+/HER2-, Invasive Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Utility of Axillary Staging in Older Patients with HER2-Positive Breast Cancer

Axillary Nodal Evaluation in Elderly Breast Cancer Patients: Potential Effects on Treatment Decisions and Survival

Abstract P2-14-07: Omission of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Patients with Early Stage Breast Cancer: Looking Beyond the Choosing Wisely Guidelines for Age < 70

Impact of Choosing Wisely Recommendations on Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy and Postoperative Radiation Rates in Women Over Age 70 Years with Hormone-Positive Breast Cancer

Can We Forgo Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Women Aged ≥ 50 Years with Early-Stage Hormone-Receptor-Positive HER2-Negative Special Histologic Subtype Breast Cancer?

How to Optimize Deimplementation of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy?

Nodal Surgery for Patients ≥ 70 Undergoing Mastectomy for DCIS? Choose Wisely

Impact of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy on Treatment Decision and Survival in Patients Aged ≥70 Years with Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Study

Axillary tumour burden in women with a fine-needle aspiration/core biopsy-proven positive node on ultrasonography compared to women with a positive sentinel node

A Prospective Study of Sentinel Node Biopsy Omission in Women Age ≥ 65 Years with ER+ Breast Cancer

How Often Do Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Results Affect Adjuvant Therapy Decisions Among Postmenopausal Women with Early-Stage HR+/HER2− Breast Cancer in the Post-RxPONDER Era?

Axillary Lymph Node Dissection in Triple-Negative or HER2-positive Breast Cancer Patients with Clinical N2 Achieving Pathological Complete Response after Neoadjuvant Therapy: is It Necessary?

Independent Risk Factors for Axillary Lymph Node Metastasis in Breast Cancer Patients with One or Two Positive Sentinel Lymph Nodes

Sentinel lymph node biopsy for melanoma in the older population: A prospective analysis of outcomes

Abstract PO5-26-12: Optimizing Treatment Decisions in Microinvasive Ductal Carcinoma in Situ: Evaluating the Need for Surgical Axillary Staging