Abstract:PLOS Medicine publishes research and commentary of general interest with clear implications for patient care, public policy or clinical research agendas. Get Started Loading metricsOpen AccessCorrectionIn subsequent data analyses associated with this article, the authors became aware of a coding error due to which there was an underadjustment for age. As such the following corrections are required.In the Methods and findings subsection of the the fifth sentence is incorrect.The correct sentence is: Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals for increasing quarters of the PA distribution relative to the lowest fourth were for moderate-intensity PA: 0.79 (0.73, 0.86), 0.70 (0.64, 0.76), and 0.58 (0.53, 0.65); for vigorous-intensity PA: 0.79 (0.72, 0.86), 0.65 (0.59,0.72), and 0.56 (0.50,0.62); and for total volume of PA: 0.79 (0.73, 0.86), 0.72 (0.66, 0.79), and 0.60 (0.54, 0.66).In the Results the third sentence of the second paragraph is incorrect.The correct sentence is: Compared with the lowest category of moderate-intensity PA, the HRs and 95% Cis for increasing quarters were 0.79 (0.73, 0.86), 0.70 (0.64, 0.76), and 0.58 (0.53, 0.65) (Fig 1), and the corresponding values for vigorous activity were: 0.79 (0.72, 0.86), 0.65 (0.59,0.72), and 0.56 (0.50,0.62).In the Subgroup, secondary, and sensitivity analyses subsection of the Results the second sentence of the fourth paragraph is incorrect.The correct sentence is: Furthermore, sensitivity analyses conducted to examine the inclusion of additional covariates (hypertension, self-rated health, BMI, total cholesterol, HDL, LDL, triglycerides, C-reactive protein, HbA1c, red and processed meat, fresh fruit, and cooked vegetables) to the multivariable Cox models utilised in the main analyses attenuated the HRs by just 6.0% to 20.0% (S2–S4 Tables).In the Discussion the second sentence of the first paragraph is incorrect.The correct sentence is: We found broadly similar associations within each subcomponent of CVD, and the associations were comparable for men and women, with the exception of vigorous activity where there was a 14% lower risk for incident CVD among men compared with 27% lower risk among women for the second quarter compared to the first.The following figures are incorrect: Figs 1, 2, 3, 4 and S2. The authors have provided corrected versions here.aAdjusted for age (stratified by 5-year age-at-risk intervals), sex, ethnicity, education, Townsend Deprivation Index, smoking, and alcohol consumption. CI, confidence interval; CVD, cardiovascular disease; HR, hazard ratio. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1003487.g001. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1003809.g001Dose–response association (HRs and associated 95% confidence interval band) between accelerometer-measured (A) total volume of PA, (B) moderate-intensity PA, and (C) vigorous-intensity PA and incident CVD using restricted cubic splines with knots at 25th, 50th, and 75th centiles of the distribution of PA (reference category = 17 milligravities (mg) for total volume of PA; 302. 4 minutes/week for moderate intensity PA; 10.08 week for vigorous intensity PA). Also shown are histograms of PA for total volume of PA in milligravities and for moderate-intensity and vigorous-intensity PA in minutes/week. CVD, cardiovascular disease; HR, hazard ratio; PA, physical activity. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1003487.g002. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1003809.g002aAdjusted for age (stratified by 5-year age-at-risk intervals), ethnicity, education, Townsend Deprivation Index, smoking, and alcohol consumption. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1003487.g003. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1003809.g003aAdjusted for age (stratified by 5-year age-at-risk intervals), sex, ethnicity, education, Townsend Deprivation Index, smoking, and alcohol consumption. CI, confidence interval; CVD, cardiovascular disease; HR, hazard ratio; IHD, ischaemic heart disease. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1003487.g004. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1003809.g004The following tables are incorrect: S1, S2, S3 and S4 Tables. The authors have provided corrected versions here.aAdjusted for age (stratified by 5-year age-at-risk intervals), sex, ethnicity, education, Townsend Deprivation Index, smoking, and alcohol consumption. bCancer (ICD codes: C01-C26, C30-C58, C60-C97, and D00-D48), diabetes mellitus (ICD codes: E10-E14), hypertension (ICD codes: I10), and chronic lower respiratory disease (ICD codes: J43 and J44.9). CVD, cardiovascular disease; HR, hazard ratio; ICD, International Classification of Diseases. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1003487.s007https://doi.org/10.1371/journal. -Abstract Truncated-

Emergency Department Attendances and Heart Disease Deaths Vary Fivefold Across England

Ambient Temperature and Emergency Department Visits: Time-series Analysis in 12 Chinese Cities

Clinical Networks for Cancer and Cardiac Care in England Report Major Funding Cuts

Association between emergency department attendances, sociodemographic factors and long-term health conditions in the population of Norfolk and Waveney, England: Cross sectional study

Longer Waits in Emergency Departments Are Inevitable As Services Reach Capacity, Report Finds

Association between delays to patient admission from the emergency department and all-cause 30-day mortality

The “better data, better planning” census: a cross-sectional, multi-centre study investigating the factors influencing patient attendance at the emergency department in Ireland

Changes in health in England, with analysis by English regions and areas of deprivation, 1990-2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013

Helen Salisbury: GPs aren't to blame for delays in emergency departments

Emergency Departments in Contemporary Healthcare: Are They Still for Emergencies? An Analysis of over 1 Million Attendances

Cardiac Arrest Mortality and Disposition Patterns in United States Emergency Departments

Abstract 304: The Impact of the National Heart Foundation’s Warning Signs Campaign on Health-Seeking Behaviour in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients

Emergency Departments Should Provide Range of Out-of-hours Services, Conference Hears

Cardiac Surgeons at Birmingham Hospital Must Submit Weekly Mortality Data after Higher Than Expected Deaths

Emergency department presentations in palliative care patients: a retrospective cohort study

Correction: Accelerometer measured physical activity and the incidence of cardiovascular disease: Evidence from the UK Biobank cohort study

Patient compliance with NHS 111 advice: Analysis of adult call and ED attendance data 2013-2017

What are emergency ambulance services doing to meet the needs of people who call frequently? A national survey of current practice in the United Kingdom

Why Do Patients Opt for the Emergency Department over Other Care Choices? A Multi-Hospital Analysis

Emergency department resource utilization among nursing home residents, a National Cross-Sectional Study

Impact of emergency department surge and end of shift on patient workup and treatment prior to referral to internal medicine: a health records review